[Mne_analysis] Unbalanced number of trials between individuals: problem in sources

Laetitia Grabot laetitia.grabot at gmail.com
Thu Mar 3 10:38:06 EST 2016
Search archives:

So does that mean that we need not to equalize epochs between conditions
(within one subject)?

2016-03-03 16:23 GMT+01:00 Denis-Alexander Engemann <
denis.engemann at gmail.com>:

> Hi Laetitia,
>
> I I'm understanding you correctly this should not be an issue for evoked
> data as long as you are using the .average method that will tell the
> inverse routines how to scale the data via its .nave attribute.
> Did you have any particular problems?
>
> Cheers,
> Denis
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Laetitia Grabot <laetitia.grabot at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Dear MNE-users,
>>
>> I am aware of the fact that when contrasting two conditions, the epochs
>> within each condition should be equalized before reconstructing in source
>> space, otherwise the SNR would be different between the two conditions.
>> That also means that if two subjects have a different number of epochs, the
>> SNR of each subject will be different. It is often the case that the number
>> of epochs doubled between subjects (50 vs. 100) so I guess that it is an
>> issue when looking at group averaged stc for instance.
>> A possible solution would be to normalize the stc to correct for the
>> number of trials. What do you think of that? What would be the proper
>> normalization?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Best,
>> Laetitia G.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mne_analysis mailing list
>> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20160303/6664a144/attachment.html 


More information about the Mne_analysis mailing list