[Mne_analysis] Negative Weighted Phase Lag Index Values
Andrea Brovelli
andrea.brovelli at univ-amu.fr
Wed Jun 14 15:13:08 EDT 2017
Dear all,
I don't know the implementation in MNE, but, as far as I know, the WPLI
ranges between between -1 and 1 (see Fig. 1C in Vinck, Neuroimage 2011).
The same is for the imaginary coherence (Nolte, Clin Neurophysiol 2004).
The strength of phase-synchronization can be indexed by the magnitude
(or squared value) of the WPLI.
bye
Andrea
Le 14-Jun-17 à 7:51 PM, Eric Larson a écrit :
> Yes it looks like WPLI should be bounded by 0 and 1. Can you open an
> MNE issue so we can look into it further?
>
> Eric
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Stout, Jeffrey <jstout at mcw.edu
> <mailto:jstout at mcw.edu>> wrote:
>
> We are running analyses on resting state MEG data and we are
> finding negative values in the weighted phase lag index (wpli)
> measure. We have also run this data using the phase lag index
> (PLI) measure and do not see any values below zero. I thought
> that both the PLI and WPLI should be defined from 0 to 1.
> Although the negative values tend to be small, we are seeing this
> across many subjects.
>
> wpli=np.load('connmat_wpli2_debiased13_30hz_run1.npy')
>
> np.min(wpli), np.max(wpli)
>
> Out[22]: (-0.0048496421426467845, 0.14954351856205442) <<<<<<<<<
> WPLI minimum value below Zero
>
> pli=np.load('connmat_pli13_30hz_run1.npy')
>
> np.min(pli), np.max(pli)
>
> Out[24]: (0.0, 0.21375066880684856) <<<<<<<<< PLI minimum value
> equals zero
>
> Is this a correct finding? Any insight would be helpful.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jeff Stout
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <mailto:Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis>
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
> whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
> the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners
> Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline
> <http://www.partners.org/complianceline> . If the e-mail was sent
> to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the
> sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20170614/cf8d82c5/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Mne_analysis
mailing list