[Mne_analysis] running artifact rejection and then linear regression

[Roberto Petrosino]

Hi Dan, 

thanks for your suggestion, which seems doable and easy enough. Would you mind expanding a bit about it? I’m not an python expert, and it would be really helpful if you can pinpoint a tutorial/documentation I can look at.

Thanks!

-Roberto


----------
Roberto Petrosino
Ph.D. Student in Linguistics
CT Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences
University of Connecticut


> On Sep 6, 2017, at 12:47 PM, Dan McCloy <drmccloy at uw.edu> wrote:
> 
> Epochs objects have a property called "selection" that give you the indices of the epochs that were not dropped.  You can use those indices to select only those rows of your design matrix.
> -- dan
> 
> Daniel McCloy
> http://dan.mccloy.info/ <http://dan.mccloy.info/>
> Postdoctoral Research Associate
> Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences
> University of Washington
> 
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Roberto Petrosino <roberto.petrosino at uconn.edu <mailto:roberto.petrosino at uconn.edu>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am trying to run linear regression on epochs after artifact rejection. 
> 
> Each epoch in my data refers to a specific stimulus (say, a specific word) having specific predictors (i.e., frequency values) associated with it. I have constructed a design matrix with all the predictors I would like to run regression against for each epoch. Since each stimulus will have specific values for the predictors, I assume that if I reject all bad epochs before running regression, there will be a mismatch between the dimension of the data to be regressed and the dimension of the design matrix array. 
> 
> So, my question is: is there any way around this - e.g., is there a way have bad epochs only marked as bad, and run linear regression on good epochs only? That way, the dimension of the data to be regressed and the design matrix are the same, but the actual regression calculations will be run selectively. I know that the function linear_regression_raw has the arguments reject and flat that would allow me to do what I want, but I’d actually rather use linear_regression on already epoched and ICA-corrected data, but I don’t seem to find any similar option that would suit my case.
> 
> Many thanks in advance,
> 
> -Roberto
> 
> ----------
> Roberto Petrosino
> Ph.D. Student in Linguistics
> CT Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences
> University of Connecticut
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis>
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline <http://www.partners.org/complianceline> . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20170906/ae131ead/attachment-0001.html