[Mne_analysis] Empty room SSP vs. Maxwell filtering

Denis-Alexander Engemann denis.engemann at gmail.com
Wed Dec 18 17:00:55 EST 2019
Search archives:

        External Email - Use Caution        

Well I guess you're asking why one should process the empty room recording
like one processes the data?
You simply want to make sure the rank of the data is the same and the only
difference is in the content of the signal, not the processing applied.

Does that make sense?
Denis

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 7:52 PM Harish Gunasekaran <ngharish18 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>         External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear Alex and Denis,
> Could you tell us what is the importance of removing the empty room noise
> component using SSP? Wouldn't the maxwell filtering remove the empty room
> noise component by default?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Harish
>
>
> *------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
> *Harish Gunasekaran,*
> NUMERICS
> <http://numerics.cea.fr/Pages/Numerics/Numerics%20program/Numerics-PhD.aspx>
> Ph.D. fellow under Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions (2019-22),
> Cognition & Brain Dynamics team <https://brainthemind.com/team2/>,
> Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit (UNICOG <http://www.unicog.org/site_2016/>),
> NeuroSpin, CEA/DRF/Joliot, CEA Paris Saclay,
> Bât 145 PC 156 , Gif s/ Yvette F-91190 FRANCE.
>
> *------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20191218/b11e94d1/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Mne_analysis mailing list