[Mne_analysis] DICS beamformer

[Ramakrishnan, Nithya]

        External Email - Use Caution        

Thank you marijn.

Just a follow up question. When the whitening pipeline is implemented in mne, I would still like to use it in my resting state MEG data.  What would be the "noise" CSD in resting data?

Also, in the future I would like to combine not only the sensors in MEG data, but EEG with MEG. Would the same apply here?

Thanks
Nithya
________________________________
From: mne_analysis-bounces at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mne_analysis-bounces at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Marijn van Vliet <w.m.vanvliet at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 6:59:34 AM
To: Discussion and support Software <mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Mne_analysis] DICS beamformer

        External Email - Use Caution

Hi Nithya,

you are correct about mixing sensors. Magnetometers and gradiometers measure in different scales, hence numerically, one signal is several order of magnitudes larger than the other, biasing the DICS filters. To counteract this, you need to normalize the signals, which is typically done by whitening the signal using a ’noise’ CSD matrix. The ’noise’ CSD is computed using a stretch of signal that serves as a recording of the size of the signals during rest. I’m actually in the process of implementing this whitening operation, but it will be some time before I finish it and get it merged into MNE-Python. In the meanwhile, just using the gradiometers should give no problems. Theoretically, it does not matter whether you select these during CSD computation, forward computation or DICS filter computation. However, the slowest part of the pipeline would be the CSD computation, so restricting that computation to grads only would have the largest speedup effect.

best,
Marijn.


> On 31 Oct 2019, at 02:00, Ramakrishnan, Nithya <nramakri at bcm.edu> wrote:
>
>         External Email - Use Caution
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am working on getting some source estimates from my resting state MEG data using the DICS beamformer. In order to do that, I am computing the CSD matrix and the DICS spatial filter. I read in a few papers that computed the DICS beamformer using only the gradiometers and I found some information that if we were to mix sensors, we would need to use a covariance matrix. Is this accurate? And if I were to use only the gradiometers, would it be better/faster to select the gradiometer data when computing the CSD matrix?
>
> Thanks
>
> Nithya Ramakrishnan
> Senior Scientific Programmer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu_mailman_listinfo_mne-5Fanalysis&d=DwIGaQ&c=ZQs-KZ8oxEw0p81sqgiaRA&r=b2dARntj9-jVYapUcYX65w&m=MfzPmD_lOlI5f38dJqsDRY4Z0HTe1x8dSef2oJYqHUQ&s=M58bJR-UHLtijAGEOmtFi2es43yesfJUOKmLhKumLyE&e=


_______________________________________________
Mne_analysis mailing list
Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu_mailman_listinfo_mne-5Fanalysis&d=DwIGaQ&c=ZQs-KZ8oxEw0p81sqgiaRA&r=b2dARntj9-jVYapUcYX65w&m=MfzPmD_lOlI5f38dJqsDRY4Z0HTe1x8dSef2oJYqHUQ&s=M58bJR-UHLtijAGEOmtFi2es43yesfJUOKmLhKumLyE&e=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20191031/ab45a74a/attachment.html