<p><span style="padding: 3px 10px; border-radius: 5px; color: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; display: inline-block; background-color: #ff0000;"> External Email - Use Caution </span></p><p></p><div dir="ltr">Hi MNE experts,<br><div><br></div><div>
<p class="gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">I’m trying to do source localization to simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG data. I modified the EEG channel location using the mgh70 montage to plot the topographic distribution of the ERP effect because the original EEG channel layout looks a bit weird. My question is which EEG channel location I should use when building the forward model. Should I use the modified EEG channel locations or the originally recorded locations? Can I use the original fiducial points and digitizer data imported from the raw data to align the MEG sensors and the head surfaceI?</p>
<p class="gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p class="gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">Thank you for your help!</p>
<p class="gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p class="gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">Best,</p>
<p class="gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">Lin</p></div></div>