[Mne_analysis] "mne_process_raw" vs "mne_raw2mat" sample # mismatch

[Alexandre Gramfort]

Hi Matt,

can you run fiff_setup_read_raw on the raw data and look if the #
mismatch is equal to the first_samp in the output structure ?

data = fiff_setup_read_raw('data_raw.fif')
data.first_samp

Alex

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Matt Panichello
<panichem at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Hello,
> I am reading raw data into matlab using mne_raw2mat. For the files I have
> read in, I have noticed a mismatch between the sample numbering in the
> resulting matlab structure and the sample numbering in the event file
> produced mne_browse_raw.
> For example, a particular trigger value (3) first appears at column number
> 64,016 in my MNE_raw.data structure in the STI 14 row, while it is listed at
> sample 72,415 in the event file produced by mne_browse_raw.
>
> Does anyone have any idea what the source of the sample # mismatch could be?
> I tried manipulating the "keep initial skip" option in mne_browse_raw but
> this didn't seem to make any difference in the event file output.
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>