[Mne_analysis] Making .stc files for separate conditions

Stephen Politzer-Ahles politzerahless at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 10:07:55 EDT 2012
Search archives:

Thanks, Alex and Dan! That is what I figured, I just wanted to make sure I
was doing the right analysis. (And don't worry, it's not inconvenient--I
can let a script do it all for me!)

Best,
Steve

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:52 AM, dgw <dgwakeman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Here is the manual section. It may not be explicit enough in its
> explanation, but --set is what you are looking for. If you can come up with
> a better wording, you can re-write it through github. The entire manual is
> run through the mne-python project on github.
>
> 6.5.2Input files
> --inv <name>
> Load the inverse operator decomposition from here.
> --meas <name>
> Load the MEG or EEG data from this file.
> --set <number>
> The data set (condition) number to load. This is the sequential number
> of the condition. You can easily see the association by looking at the
> condition list in mne_analyze when you load the file.
>
> D
>
> Stephen Politzer-Ahles wrote:
>
>> Hello MNEers,
>>
>> I am using mne_make_movie to make .stc files of current estimates. All
>> the examples I've seen so far use mne_make_movie with one inverse operator
>> (specified with --inv) and one MEG average file (with --meas). But in my
>> case, my average .fif file for each subject contains four separate
>> averages, one for each condition (so for example if i open mne_analyze,
>> load a surface, and load the .fif file using File/Open, I then pick one of
>> the four sets to display). So my question is, instead of running
>> mne_make_movie once per subject to make one .stc file, would the
>> appropriate procedure be to do it four times per subject, to get separate
>> stc files for each condition (using the --set option to specify which
>> condition to get from the .fif)?
>>
>> Sorry if this is a basic question addressed in the manual somewhere;
>> maybe i just missed it. And thanks to everyone on the list who has helped
>> me before, I appreciate it very much!
>>
>> Best,
>> Steve Politzer-Ahles
>>
>> --
>> Stephen Politzer-Ahles
>> University of Kansas
>> Linguistics Department
>> http://www.linguistics.ku.edu/
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>> ------------
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Mne_analysis mailing list
>> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu <Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_**analysis<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis>
>>
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/**complianceline<http://www.partners.org/complianceline>. If the e-mail was sent to you in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>
>


-- 
Stephen Politzer-Ahles
University of Kansas
Linguistics Department
http://www.linguistics.ku.edu/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20120410/f7e80c1a/attachment.html 


More information about the Mne_analysis mailing list