[Mne_analysis] Regularization of the noise covariance matrix with tSSSed data

Ying Yang evergreenlifeyangying at gmail.com
Fri Jul 18 16:00:21 EDT 2014
Search archives:

Thanks a lot for all the answers!
Ying


On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Sheraz Khan <sheraz at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:

> hi Ying,
>
> Rey might pinch in more, my few cents, tsss projection are not orthgonal
> in space, so they do not reduce the rank as SSS or PCA, tsss projections
> reduces the variance of the first few components, since most rank
> determining algoritham uses some sort of ratio of highest to lowest, after
> tsss if you try to determine rank in Matlab or python they might give you a
> value higher than 64.
>
> Best rank guest should be 64 - all the PCA projection you are using.
>
> sheraz
> On Jul 18, 2014 7:52 AM, "Alexandre Gramfort" <
> alexandre.gramfort at telecom-paristech.fr> wrote:
>
>> hi Ying,
>>
>> try at first without regularizing. MNE should detect the rank
>> automatically when whitening. It's however possible that tSSS makes
>> rank estimation difficult due to slight head positions changes.
>>
>> maybe Sheraz or Rey can share their insights too.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Ying Yang
>> <evergreenlifeyangying at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi MNE experts,
>> >
>> > I am wondering whether it is common to regularize the noise covariance
>> > matrix for tSSSed data. Since tSSS may reduce the rank of the sensor
>> data,
>> > (in my case to 64),  the covariance matrix is singular too.  As a
>> result,
>> > the whitened forward gain matrix had a lot of zeros.
>> >  In this case, is it better to regularize the noise covariance matrix,
>> or to
>> > leave it intact such that the rank of noise matches the rank of
>>  "signal"?
>> > Thanks in advance!
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Ying
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mne_analysis mailing list
>> > Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
>> >
>> >
>> > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
>> it is
>> > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> > e-mail
>> > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> > HelpLine at
>> > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in
>> > error
>> > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> > properly
>> > dispose of the e-mail.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20140718/e4178ad0/attachment.html 


More information about the Mne_analysis mailing list