[Mne_analysis] What is a "good" noise covariance matrix?

Baptiste Gauthier gauthierb.ens at gmail.com
Wed Oct 1 10:02:58 EDT 2014
Search archives:

Dear mne-python experts and users,

following the guidelines of source reconstruction of ERFs, I estimated
noise covariance matrices from empty room noise (neuromag system) for
calculating inverse operator. When looking at the source estimates I got,
it appears that source amplitude can be very variable, not in term of
timecourse patterns (which is good for ERFs) but in term of absolute
amplitude (need to play with "fmult" in mne_analyze visualization tools; I
suppose it's bad for stats).
So I checked if the noise estimation was similar across subjects and
realize I have no criterion to decide if noise covariance was "ok" or
not...
What criterion should I apply?
Should I use then regularization for "bad" subjects?

PS:find attached several noise covariance matrices from my study
PPS: Does it make sense to band-pass the empty room signal with the same
classical band pass applied to the data? Can it improve a bit the thing?

Best,

Baptiste Gauthier



 bad?.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_eZxstAMJQscGpiOF9VY00yLWc/edit?usp=drive_web>

 good?.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_eZxstAMJQsY01WdGlJbENHa0U/edit?usp=drive_web>


2014-10-01 14:05 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Gauthier <gauthierb.ens at gmail.com>:

> Dear mne-python experts and users,
>
> following the guidelines of source reconstruction of ERFs, I estimated
> noise covariance matrices from empty room noise (neuromag system) for
> calculating inverse operator. When looking at the source estimates I got,
> it appears that source amplitude can be very variable, not in term of
> timecourse patterns (which is good for ERFs) but in term of absolute
> amplitude (need to play with "fmult" in mne_analyze visualization tools; I
> suppose it's bad for stats).
> So I checked if the noise estimation was similar across subjects and
> realize I have no criterion to decide if noise covariance was "ok" or
> not...
> What criterion should I apply?
> Should I use then regularization for "bad" subjects?
>
> PS:find attached several noise covariance matrices from my study
> PPS: Does it make sense to band-pass the empty room signal with the same
> classical band pass applied to the data? Can it improve a bit the thing?
>
> Best,
>
> Baptiste Gauthier
>
> --
> Baptiste Gauthier
> Postdoctoral Research Fellow
>
> INSERM-CEA Cognitive Neuroimaging unit
> CEA/SAC/DSV/DRM/Neurospin center
> Bât 145, Point Courier 156
> F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex FRANCE
>



-- 
Baptiste Gauthier
Postdoctoral Research Fellow

INSERM-CEA Cognitive Neuroimaging unit
CEA/SAC/DSV/DRM/Neurospin center
Bât 145, Point Courier 156
F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex FRANCE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20141001/3cf45322/attachment.html 


More information about the Mne_analysis mailing list