[Mne_analysis] Mne_analysis Digest, Vol 81, Issue 9

[Eric Larson]

MEG and EEG provide complementary measures of the electromagnetic
field/potential, so combining them should improve localization. For
example, see this paper by Sharon et al.:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17532230

Eric


On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Alexandre Gramfort <
alexandre.gramfort at telecom-paristech.fr> wrote:

> > Just one last question: what is the gain of combining all sensor types
> > (grads, mags, eeg) ? Here I know from visual inspection and sensor-level
> > analysis that my eeg data is noisier than meg ...
>
> it's always a good idea to try to combine them all unless EEG looks crap
> or EEG forward is bad due to bad bem + segmentation.
> To check try localizing something simple with EEG only.
>
> HTH
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20141002/54d6ebb9/attachment.html