Freesurfer May 2016

freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

135 participants
197 discussions

Segmentation of a 3D IR-deskulled volume
by Aquino Domenico 26 May '16

26 May '16

Dear Freesurfer team, I'm trying to segment a brain from a non standard sequence. It is a 3D IR sequence that I have previously pre-elaborated and deskulled. The software is running from a long time and at the moment is correcting defects (17/128) but I'm not sure it's working properly. I have previously sent you the NIFTI_GZ file but, if you prefer, I'll send it using FTP. Could you please help me in detecting some possible issues? Thanks a lot, Domenico ___________________________________________ Eng. Domenico Aquino Department of Neuroradiology IRCCS Foundation Neurological Institute "Carlo Besta" Via Celoria,11-20133 Milano Phone: +39 02 23942472 Fax +39 02 23942543 [1463859753944_LogoWhite.jpg]

1 0

Merging Brain Hemispheres
by Saeed Mahdizadeh Bakhshmand 26 May '16

26 May '16

Hello, As we know, Freesurfer generates separate surface models and associated labels for each brain hemisphere, is there any way to merge two hemisphere and come up with a single cortex surface? My best, Saeed _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.

1 0

LME MATLAB, X matrix error
by Hanbyul Cho 26 May '16

26 May '16

Dear FreeSurfer Team, I processed in MATLAB for Linear Mixed Effects Models Analysis with this X matrix: X matrix is 'Subjects N X 11', 11 columns are as follow, 1. Intercept (all '1') 2. time (from baseline time point) 3. time2 4. Patients group = 1, Control = 0 5. 4.X time 6. 4.X time2 7. Patients group = 0, Control = 1 8. 7. X time 9. 8. X time2 10. age 11. extra values for covariate 1. When I process this command, [lhTh01,lhRe01] = lme_mass_fit_EMinit(X,[1],Y,ni,lhcortex,3,4) The MATLAB windows print the warning alarm repeatedly. " Warning: Matrix is close to singular or badly scaled. Results may be inaccurate." Is this X matrix something wrong? 2. After complete 'lme_mass_fit_EMinit' process with the warning, I tried the next command, [lhRgs01,lhRgMeans01] = lme_mass_RgGrow(lhsphere, lhRe01, lhTh01,lhcortex,2,95); This command took a long time to process, and it caused the whole stop MATLAB works. Is it also because of the X matrix...? Could you let me know the solution for the X matrix problems ? Best Wishes, Han

2 4

Design Matrix Creation
by Timothy Hendrickson 26 May '16

26 May '16

Freesurfer Support, I'd like to create a design matrix for a group analysis outside of the DODS and DOSS models. I understand that in order to do this the -X flag must be used. However, I have been unable to find examples of how to do this. I am hoping to reveal a difference in thickness or gyrification amongst a clinical population. The data set contains two factors: diagnosis, and study site and one covariate: age. Diagnosis has two levels: controls, and patients. Study site has four levels, one level for each location the data has been collected from. What I would ideally like to do is: 1) Take into account offset differences amongst diagnosis and study site. 2) Allowing a difference in age slope amongst the diagnosis levels 3) Modeling the age slope as the same for the study site levels My FSGD file is designed as follows Class SITE 1-Control Class SITE 1-PATIENT Class SITE 2-Control Class SITE 2-PATIENT Class SITE 3-Control Class SITE 3-PATIENT Class SITE 4-Control Class SITE 4-PATIENT Variables age_at_scan study site levels = 1,2,3 and 4 diagnosis levels = PATIENT and Control age_at_scan = covariate age Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Respectfully, Tim -- Timothy Hendrickson Department of Psychiatry University of Minnesota Mobile: 507-259-3434 (texts okay)

2 3

(no subject)
by Saeed Mahdizadeh Bakhshmand 26 May '16

26 May '16

1 0

mri_glmfit version
by Victor Montal Blancafort 26 May '16

26 May '16

Dear FS experts We have been playing around with different mri_glmfit versions. I processed all my data with FS v5.1, and then I run the mri_glmfit with both the 5.1 and 5.3 versions, using exactly the same X, same contrasts matrix and obviously the same images. Our concern is that the results differ significantly between both versions. Concretely, the results from the 5.3 mri_glmfit version are shifted 0.3 points with respect from the 5.1 one. More precisely, the results using the 5.1 version at 1.0 look the same as the 5.3 at 1.3 significance level. Is there any difference in parameter estimation or anything else between both versions? Should the results be the same given that we use the same data, parameters, etc? Thanks in advance for your replies, Best regards, V.

2 1

Connectivity design ill-conditioned
by Zimmerman, Jared Perry 26 May '16

26 May '16

Hi, I'm having a problem running first level connectivity analysis on my resting-state data. When I run selxavg3-sess I keep getting a notice that my design is ill-conditioned but I can't figure out why. I am trying to run analysis on two 124 volume rsfMRI runs in my fsd and the design matrix looks fine to me with dimensions 248x47 (although should ncols be an even number since I'm doing two runs?). Poking around the Xtmp.mat I noticed a few things that are confusing. Notably, flac.funcfspec points only to one of my runs in the fsd, and flac.X is a 124x24 matrix which appears to be the design matrix for just one of my runs (and if there are 24 columns in that, should there be 28 columns in the design matrix for combining both runs?). Any help figuring out why this design is ill-conditioned would be great. I've attached my Xtmp.mat, selxavg3.log and analysis design file to this email, but it's unclear to me if the mailing list will scrub them off. If so I can make them available some other way. Thanks, Jared

2 1

Fwd: Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry
by Rockers, Elijah D. 26 May '16

26 May '16

Quick update on the GLX errors we experience with remote access of freesurfer, and qdec The below conversations may be of interest. -Eli -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 20:59:55 -0400 From: Magda Tsintou <magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com><mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> To: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li(a)gmail.com><mailto:ambrose.li@gmail.com> CC: MacQueen, Don <macqueen1(a)llnl.gov><mailto:macqueen1@llnl.gov>, Rich Cook <wealthychef(a)gmail.com><mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>, x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> <x11-users(a)lists.apple.com><mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>, Rockers, Elijah D. <edrockers(a)houstonmethodist.org><mailto:edrockers@houstonmethodist.org> Hi Ambrose, Thanks a lot for letting us know. That is very helpful. I would encourage everyone to send to the x.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__x.org&d=DQMFaQ&c=QmPtDi…> mailing list so that we see if they could help us find the support we need to continue our work. I have already emailed them. Let's see how it goes. Thanks again! Best, Magda. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Ambrose LI <ambrose.li(a)gmail.com<mailto:ambrose.li@gmail.com>> wrote: For anyone who need this to continue working: I mentioned this thread on Twitter and it got picked up by the X.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__X.org&d=DQQFaQ&c=QmPtDi…> Foundation. They are requesting that anyone who need IGLX to work to send email to the x.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__x.org&d=DQMFaQ&c=QmPtDi…> mailing lists to let them know what you need. They have no idea that people don't even know IGLX has been deprecated, let alone people are actually still depending on it for work. https://mobile.twitter.com/XOrgFoundation/status/733516667737628674<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mobile.twitter.com_XOr…> 2016-05-25 18:59 GMT-04:00 MacQueen, Don <macqueen1(a)llnl.gov<mailto:macqueen1@llnl.gov>>: For what it's worth, see, <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.x.org_wiki_Develop…>https://www.x.org/wiki/Development/Security/Advisory-2014-12-09/ -- Don MacQueen Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Ave., L-627 Livermore, CA 94550 925-423-1062<tel:925-423-1062> From: <<mailto:x11-users-bounces+macq=llnl.gov@lists.apple.com>x11-users-bounces+macq=llnl.gov(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users-bounces+macq=llnl.gov@lists.apple.com>> on behalf of Rich Cook <<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 4:43 PM To: Magda Tsintou <magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>> Cc: "<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>" <x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>>, "Rockers, Elijah D." <<mailto:edrockers@houstonmethodist.org>edrockers(a)houstonmethodist.org<mailto:edrockers@houstonmethodist.org>> Subject: Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry There will be a tsunami of interest in this if IGLX goes away. This is a legitimate user need. -- Rich On May 18, 2016, at 4:31 PM, Magda Tsintou <<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>> wrote: Yes indeed this will be a serious problem in my lab too. We all rely on that to work on our research projects and I think that most neuroimaging labs do the same and I am sure that there are tons of other applications I can not even think of right now. I really hope that a solution for this will come up so that there will be no problems. When I notified my lab they did not even know how to guide me on this. At least there should be some sort of awareness in the labs about that issue so that not everyone needs to figure it out alone. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Rich Cook <<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>> wrote: There's nothing to transition to! I cannot believe that XOrg thinks that nobody needs to do this, it's mind boggling to me. It's going to be a big problem at our lab. > On May 18, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Rockers, Elijah D. <<mailto:edrockers@houstonmethodist.org>edrockers(a)houstonmethodist.org<mailto:edrockers@houstonmethodist.org>> wrote: > > Hello again experts, > > Being that XQ is no longer going to support IGLX, this could interfere > with some current application's functionality in our lab. Should I > notify the application developers that they should consider looking to > transition away from GLX? Or is this kind of ssh X forwarding to the mac > not even possible without GLX (are there alternatives to GLX they could > consider?) > > Apologies, even as a computer nerd, the complexity of graphics > software/hardware remains somewhat of a mystery to me, so I'm not 100% > sure I'm even asking the right questions here.. > > Thanks, > > On 05/18/2016 01:00 AM, <mailto:x11-users-request@lists.apple.com> x11-users-request(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users-request@lists.apple.com> wrote: >> Send X11-users mailing list submissions to >> <mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> <mailto:x11-users-request@lists.apple.com> x11-users-request(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users-request@lists.apple.com> >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> <mailto:x11-users-owner@lists.apple.com> x11-users-owner(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users-owner@lists.apple.com> >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of X11-users digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry (Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia) >> 2. Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry (Richard Cook) >> 3. Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry (Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia) >> 4. Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry (Rich Cook) >> 5. Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry (James Gunning) >> 6. Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry (César) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 21:59:06 -0700 >> From: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> >> To: César <<mailto:cesarmensajes@gmail.com>cesarmensajes(a)gmail.com<mailto:cesarmensajes@gmail.com>> >> Cc: "<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>" <<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>> >> Subject: Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry >> Message-ID: <<mailto:31F32838-10D2-424F-A417-7213F78E67A2@apple.com>31F32838-10D2-424F-A417-7213F78E67A2(a)apple.com<mailto:31F32838-10D2-424F-A417-7213F78E67A2@apple.com>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> There was one change, but it didn't completely address the problem. >> >>> On May 17, 2016, at 21:53, César <<mailto:cesarmensajes@gmail.com>cesarmensajes(a)gmail.com<mailto:cesarmensajes@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Jeremy, was the OpenGL context clipping bug addressed in 2.7.9, or is it still pending? (I sent you a minimal working example showing the bug some time ago) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> César >>> >>> >>> >>> El miércoles, 18 de mayo de 2016, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> escribió: >>> FWIW, there are security vulnerabilities addressed in the versions of libpng in 2.7.9, so you might want to update at least for the security reasons. >>> >>> The only issues that I'm aware of as regressions are the issues with IGLX (which isn't really going to be supported much longer) and a regression in the support for tcp connections (which is off by default and discouraged). >>> >>> --Jeremy >>> >>>> On May 17, 2016, at 14:39, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Magda, thank you so much for your thoughts! I did notice that v2.7.9 was just released earlier this month, and bugs were one thing I wondered about. I'm pretty out of the loop on this stuff. >>>> >>>> And, no I don't think I have anything to gain from an upgrade. Nothing prompted me to look into an upgrade aside from curiosity and an attempt to stay up to date. I just use XQ to run Inkscape, and so far I haven't had any issues in the little I've used it. It also appears that Inkscape is still standing at the same version (0.91) as when I initially installed it with XQ So, I will take your advice. If it ain't broken... >>>> >>>> Many Thanks! >>>> Christopher >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Magda Tsintou <<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> Note: Sorry forgot to reply to all so that everyone can keep track of the conversation... >>>> >>>> Hi Christopher, >>>> >>>> With your OSX you would certainly not need to update. We recently were discussing some bugs in XQ 2.7.9 that have not been resolved while the version 2.7.8 works perfectly fine and I am running El Capitan 10.11.5. XQ 2.7.9 did not allow me to work with certain commands that needed forwarding over ssh and given the limited people who have been working on that fix this may cause problems for some time. I would strongly recommend from my personal experience to stick with XQ 2.7.8 if you have nothing in particular to gain from upgrading. I hope this helps a bit. Good luck! >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Magda. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> Hi I'm running XQ 2.7.8, and I see that 2.7.9 is now available. If I check for updates through the XQ "app" it says I'm up to date with 2.7.8. >>>> >>>> So, if I manually download and install 2.7.9 from the website should I just install it over the previous version? >>>> >>>> And on a side note, should I be able to update through 2.7.8, or is it common knowledge that it doesn't work that way since this is more of a framework (for lack of better words) rather than a normal application. >>>> >>>> Macbook Pro Mid 2012 15" >>>> OSX 10.8.5 >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Christopher >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>> >>>> This email sent to <mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>> >>>> This email sent to <mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> jeremyhu(a)freedesktop.org<mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: smime.p7s >> Type: application/pkcs7-signature >> Size: 4465 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: <<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.apple.com_archive…>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.apple.com_archive… > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 22:18:27 -0700 >> From: Richard Cook <<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>> >> To: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> >> Cc: <mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> >> Subject: Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry >> Message-ID: <<mailto:4479A8B5-7740-4BFB-B533-B95364D78F23@gmail.com>4479A8B5-7740-4BFB-B533-B95364D78F23(a)gmail.com<mailto:4479A8B5-7740-4BFB-B533-B95364D78F23@gmail.com>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> >> I don't know what IGLX is, but GLX did not seem to work for me at all when I tried it in 2.7.9. Specifically, I could not run glxgears on a remote linux box, which is the canonical GLX test I always use. But the good news it that switching back to 2.7.8 was painless and made my problems with 2.7.9 go away. >> >>> On May 17, 2016, at 9:40 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>> FWIW, there are security vulnerabilities addressed in the versions of libpng in 2.7.9, so you might want to update at least for the security reasons. >>> >>> The only issues that I'm aware of as regressions are the issues with IGLX (which isn't really going to be supported much longer) and a regression in the support for tcp connections (which is off by default and discouraged). >>> >>> --Jeremy >>> >>>> On May 17, 2016, at 14:39, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Magda, thank you so much for your thoughts! I did notice that v2.7.9 was just released earlier this month, and bugs were one thing I wondered about. I'm pretty out of the loop on this stuff. >>>> >>>> And, no I don't think I have anything to gain from an upgrade. Nothing prompted me to look into an upgrade aside from curiosity and an attempt to stay up to date. I just use XQ to run Inkscape, and so far I haven't had any issues in the little I've used it. It also appears that Inkscape is still standing at the same version (0.91) as when I initially installed it with XQ So, I will take your advice. If it ain't broken... >>>> >>>> Many Thanks! >>>> Christopher >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Magda Tsintou <<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> Note: Sorry forgot to reply to all so that everyone can keep track of the conversation... >>>> >>>> Hi Christopher, >>>> >>>> With your OSX you would certainly not need to update. We recently were discussing some bugs in XQ 2.7.9 that have not been resolved while the version 2.7.8 works perfectly fine and I am running El Capitan 10.11.5. XQ 2.7.9 did not allow me to work with certain commands that needed forwarding over ssh and given the limited people who have been working on that fix this may cause problems for some time. I would strongly recommend from my personal experience to stick with XQ 2.7.8 if you have nothing in particular to gain from upgrading. I hope this helps a bit. Good luck! >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Magda. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> Hi I'm running XQ 2.7.8, and I see that 2.7.9 is now available. If I check for updates through the XQ "app" it says I'm up to date with 2.7.8. >>>> >>>> So, if I manually download and install 2.7.9 from the website should I just install it over the previous version? >>>> >>>> And on a side note, should I be able to update through 2.7.8, or is it common knowledge that it doesn't work that way since this is more of a framework (for lack of better words) rather than a normal application. >>>> >>>> Macbook Pro Mid 2012 15" >>>> OSX 10.8.5 >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Christopher >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>> >>>> This email sent to <mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>> >>>> This email sent to <mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> jeremyhu(a)freedesktop.org<mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>> >>> This email sent to <mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com> wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 22:38:13 -0700 >> From: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> >> To: Richard Cook <<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>> >> Cc: <mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> >> Subject: Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry >> Message-ID: <<mailto:6C53050F-0731-4FBB-B83C-E02B54AA3F08@apple.com>6C53050F-0731-4FBB-B83C-E02B54AA3F08(a)apple.com<mailto:6C53050F-0731-4FBB-B83C-E02B54AA3F08@apple.com>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> >>> On May 17, 2016, at 22:18, Richard Cook <<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> I don't know what IGLX is, but GLX did not seem to work for me at all when I tried it in 2.7.9. Specifically, I could not run glxgears on a remote linux box, which is the canonical GLX test I always use. >> That is IGLX. >> >>> But the good news it that switching back to 2.7.8 was painless and made my problems with 2.7.9 go away. >>> >>>> On May 17, 2016, at 9:40 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> FWIW, there are security vulnerabilities addressed in the versions of libpng in 2.7.9, so you might want to update at least for the security reasons. >>>> >>>> The only issues that I'm aware of as regressions are the issues with IGLX (which isn't really going to be supported much longer) and a regression in the support for tcp connections (which is off by default and discouraged). >>>> >>>> --Jeremy >>>> >>>>> On May 17, 2016, at 14:39, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Magda, thank you so much for your thoughts! I did notice that v2.7.9 was just released earlier this month, and bugs were one thing I wondered about. I'm pretty out of the loop on this stuff. >>>>> >>>>> And, no I don't think I have anything to gain from an upgrade. Nothing prompted me to look into an upgrade aside from curiosity and an attempt to stay up to date. I just use XQ to run Inkscape, and so far I haven't had any issues in the little I've used it. It also appears that Inkscape is still standing at the same version (0.91) as when I initially installed it with XQ So, I will take your advice. If it ain't broken... >>>>> >>>>> Many Thanks! >>>>> Christopher >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Magda Tsintou <<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> Note: Sorry forgot to reply to all so that everyone can keep track of the conversation... >>>>> >>>>> Hi Christopher, >>>>> >>>>> With your OSX you would certainly not need to update. We recently were discussing some bugs in XQ 2.7.9 that have not been resolved while the version 2.7.8 works perfectly fine and I am running El Capitan 10.11.5. XQ 2.7.9 did not allow me to work with certain commands that needed forwarding over ssh and given the limited people who have been working on that fix this may cause problems for some time. I would strongly recommend from my personal experience to stick with XQ 2.7.8 if you have nothing in particular to gain from upgrading. I hope this helps a bit. Good luck! >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Magda. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> Hi I'm running XQ 2.7.8, and I see that 2.7.9 is now available. If I check for updates through the XQ "app" it says I'm up to date with 2.7.8. >>>>> >>>>> So, if I manually download and install 2.7.9 from the website should I just install it over the previous version? >>>>> >>>>> And on a side note, should I be able to update through 2.7.8, or is it common knowledge that it doesn't work that way since this is more of a framework (for lack of better words) rather than a normal application. >>>>> >>>>> Macbook Pro Mid 2012 15" >>>>> OSX 10.8.5 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Christopher >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>>> >>>>> This email sent to <mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>>> >>>>> This email sent to <mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> jeremyhu(a)freedesktop.org<mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>> >>>> This email sent to <mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com> wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: smime.p7s >> Type: application/pkcs7-signature >> Size: 4465 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: <<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.apple.com_archive…>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.apple.com_archive… > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 22:42:44 -0700 >> From: Rich Cook <<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>> >> To: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> >> Cc: <mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> >> Subject: Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry >> Message-ID: <<mailto:B3A6C40B-0280-4068-A564-2D29D14FF451@gmail.com>B3A6C40B-0280-4068-A564-2D29D14FF451(a)gmail.com<mailto:B3A6C40B-0280-4068-A564-2D29D14FF451@gmail.com>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> >> Hmm, what is going to replace IGLX? How are people going to display OpenGL graphics over remote X11 if not by GLX? Sorry if this is offtopic. >> >>> On May 17, 2016, at 10:38 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On May 17, 2016, at 22:18, Richard Cook <<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I don't know what IGLX is, but GLX did not seem to work for me at all when I tried it in 2.7.9. Specifically, I could not run glxgears on a remote linux box, which is the canonical GLX test I always use. >>> That is IGLX. >>> >>>> But the good news it that switching back to 2.7.8 was painless and made my problems with 2.7.9 go away. >>>> >>>>> On May 17, 2016, at 9:40 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> FWIW, there are security vulnerabilities addressed in the versions of libpng in 2.7.9, so you might want to update at least for the security reasons. >>>>> >>>>> The only issues that I'm aware of as regressions are the issues with IGLX (which isn't really going to be supported much longer) and a regression in the support for tcp connections (which is off by default and discouraged). >>>>> >>>>> --Jeremy >>>>> >>>>>> On May 17, 2016, at 14:39, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Magda, thank you so much for your thoughts! I did notice that v2.7.9 was just released earlier this month, and bugs were one thing I wondered about. I'm pretty out of the loop on this stuff. >>>>>> >>>>>> And, no I don't think I have anything to gain from an upgrade. Nothing prompted me to look into an upgrade aside from curiosity and an attempt to stay up to date. I just use XQ to run Inkscape, and so far I haven't had any issues in the little I've used it. It also appears that Inkscape is still standing at the same version (0.91) as when I initially installed it with XQ So, I will take your advice. If it ain't broken... >>>>>> >>>>>> Many Thanks! >>>>>> Christopher >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Magda Tsintou <<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> Note: Sorry forgot to reply to all so that everyone can keep track of the conversation... >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Christopher, >>>>>> >>>>>> With your OSX you would certainly not need to update. We recently were discussing some bugs in XQ 2.7.9 that have not been resolved while the version 2.7.8 works perfectly fine and I am running El Capitan 10.11.5. XQ 2.7.9 did not allow me to work with certain commands that needed forwarding over ssh and given the limited people who have been working on that fix this may cause problems for some time. I would strongly recommend from my personal experience to stick with XQ 2.7.8 if you have nothing in particular to gain from upgrading. I hope this helps a bit. Good luck! >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Magda. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi I'm running XQ 2.7.8, and I see that 2.7.9 is now available. If I check for updates through the XQ "app" it says I'm up to date with 2.7.8. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, if I manually download and install 2.7.9 from the website should I just install it over the previous version? >>>>>> >>>>>> And on a side note, should I be able to update through 2.7.8, or is it common knowledge that it doesn't work that way since this is more of a framework (for lack of better words) rather than a normal application. >>>>>> >>>>>> Macbook Pro Mid 2012 15" >>>>>> OSX 10.8.5 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> Christopher >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>>>> >>>>>> This email sent to <mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>>>> >>>>>> This email sent to <mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> jeremyhu(a)freedesktop.org<mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>>> >>>>> This email sent to <mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com> wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com> >> ————— >> Cheers from Rich Cook >> =============================== >> Success is the ability to go from one failure to the next with no loss of enthusiasm. --Winston Churchill >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 15:56:13 +1000 >> From: James Gunning <<mailto:James.Gunning@csiro.au>James.Gunning(a)csiro.au<mailto:James.Gunning@csiro.au>> >> To: Rich Cook <<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>>, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia >> <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> >> Cc: <mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> >> Subject: Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry >> Message-ID: <<mailto:573C03FD.8080509@csiro.au>573C03FD.8080509(a)csiro.au<mailto:573C03FD.8080509@csiro.au>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" >> >> Hi Rich, Jeremy, all, >> Yes, I think a lot of us care about this a deal. >> Any news welcome. >> James. >> >> >> Rich Cook wrote: >>> Hmm, what is going to replace IGLX? How are people going to display OpenGL graphics over remote X11 if not by GLX? Sorry if this is offtopic. >>> >>>> On May 17, 2016, at 10:38 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On May 17, 2016, at 22:18, Richard Cook <<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't know what IGLX is, but GLX did not seem to work for me at all when I tried it in 2.7.9. Specifically, I could not run glxgears on a remote linux box, which is the canonical GLX test I always use. >>>> That is IGLX. >>>> >>>>> But the good news it that switching back to 2.7.8 was painless and made my problems with 2.7.9 go away. >>>>> >>>>>> On May 17, 2016, at 9:40 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> FWIW, there are security vulnerabilities addressed in the versions of libpng in 2.7.9, so you might want to update at least for the security reasons. >>>>>> >>>>>> The only issues that I'm aware of as regressions are the issues with IGLX (which isn't really going to be supported much longer) and a regression in the support for tcp connections (which is off by default and discouraged). >>>>>> >>>>>> --Jeremy >>>>>> >>>>>>> On May 17, 2016, at 14:39, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Magda, thank you so much for your thoughts! I did notice that v2.7.9 was just released earlier this month, and bugs were one thing I wondered about. I'm pretty out of the loop on this stuff. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And, no I don't think I have anything to gain from an upgrade. Nothing prompted me to look into an upgrade aside from curiosity and an attempt to stay up to date. I just use XQ to run Inkscape, and so far I haven't had any issues in the little I've used it. It also appears that Inkscape is still standing at the same version (0.91) as when I initially installed it with XQ So, I will take your advice. If it ain't broken... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Many Thanks! >>>>>>> Christopher >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Magda Tsintou <<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> Note: Sorry forgot to reply to all so that everyone can keep track of the conversation... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Christopher, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With your OSX you would certainly not need to update. We recently were discussing some bugs in XQ 2.7.9 that have not been resolved while the version 2.7.8 works perfectly fine and I am running El Capitan 10.11.5. XQ 2.7.9 did not allow me to work with certain commands that needed forwarding over ssh and given the limited people who have been working on that fix this may cause problems for some time. I would strongly recommend from my personal experience to stick with XQ 2.7.8 if you have nothing in particular to gain from upgrading. I hope this helps a bit. Good luck! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Magda. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi I'm running XQ 2.7.8, and I see that 2.7.9 is now available. If I check for updates through the XQ "app" it says I'm up to date with 2.7.8. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, if I manually download and install 2.7.9 from the website should I just install it over the previous version? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And on a side note, should I be able to update through 2.7.8, or is it common knowledge that it doesn't work that way since this is more of a framework (for lack of better words) rather than a normal application. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Macbook Pro Mid 2012 15" >>>>>>> OSX 10.8.5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> Christopher >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This email sent to <mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This email sent to <mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> jeremyhu(a)freedesktop.org<mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>>>> >>>>>> This email sent to <mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com> wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com> >>> ————— >>> Cheers from Rich Cook >>> =============================== >>> Success is the ability to go from one failure to the next with no loss of enthusiasm. --Winston Churchill >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>> >>> This email sent to <mailto:james.gunning@csiro.au> james.gunning(a)csiro.au<mailto:james.gunning@csiro.au> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: James_Gunning.vcf >> Type: text/x-vcard >> Size: 223 bytes >> Desc: not available >> URL: <<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.apple.com_archive…>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.apple.com_archive… > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 07:59:37 +0200 >> From: César <<mailto:cesarmensajes@gmail.com>cesarmensajes(a)gmail.com<mailto:cesarmensajes@gmail.com>> >> To: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> >> Cc: "<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>" <<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>x11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com>> >> Subject: Re: XQuartz 2.7.9 Update Inquiry >> Message-ID: >> <<mailto:CALGOyxrDB8O1WXGFG-H1AOrDq0XekRb1tE3B4UFqtFo4hxyx6A@mail.gmail.com>CALGOyxrDB8O1WXGFG-H1AOrDq0XekRb1tE3B4UFqtFo4hxyx6A(a)mail.gmail.com<mailto:CALGOyxrDB8O1WXGFG-H1AOrDq0XekRb1tE3B4UFqtFo4hxyx6A@mail.gmail.com>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Ok, thanks a lot, I look forward to the final fix (it's not a critical bug, >> but it does make my apps look like if they were broken -they run fine, but >> their UI looks broken) >> >> Thanks, >> >> César >> >> >> >> El miércoles, 18 de mayo de 2016, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia < >> <mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com> jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com>> escribió: >> >>> There was one change, but it didn't completely address the problem. >>> >>>> On May 17, 2016, at 21:53, César <<mailto:cesarmensajes@gmail.com>cesarmensajes(a)gmail.com<mailto:cesarmensajes@gmail.com> <javascript:;><javascript:;>> >>> wrote: >>>> Jeremy, was the OpenGL context clipping bug addressed in 2.7.9, or is it >>> still pending? (I sent you a minimal working example showing the bug some >>> time ago) >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> César >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> El miércoles, 18 de mayo de 2016, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia < >>> <mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com> jeremyhu(a)apple.com<mailto:jeremyhu@apple.com> <javascript:;><javascript:;>> escribió: >>>> FWIW, there are security vulnerabilities addressed in the versions of >>> libpng in 2.7.9, so you might want to update at least for the security >>> reasons. >>>> The only issues that I'm aware of as regressions are the issues with >>> IGLX (which isn't really going to be supported much longer) and a >>> regression in the support for tcp connections (which is off by default and >>> discouraged). >>>> --Jeremy >>>> >>>>> On May 17, 2016, at 14:39, Christopher Fick <<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com>spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com> >>> <javascript:;><javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>> Magda, thank you so much for your thoughts! I did notice that v2.7.9 >>> was just released earlier this month, and bugs were one thing I wondered >>> about. I'm pretty out of the loop on this stuff. >>>>> And, no I don't think I have anything to gain from an upgrade. >>> Nothing prompted me to look into an upgrade aside from curiosity and an >>> attempt to stay up to date. I just use XQ to run Inkscape, and so far I >>> haven't had any issues in the little I've used it. It also appears that >>> Inkscape is still standing at the same version (0.91) as when I initially >>> installed it with XQ So, I will take your advice. If it ain't broken... >>>>> Many Thanks! >>>>> Christopher >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Magda Tsintou < >>> <mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> <javascript:;><javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>> Note: Sorry forgot to reply to all so that everyone can keep track of >>> the conversation... >>>>> Hi Christopher, >>>>> >>>>> With your OSX you would certainly not need to update. We recently were >>> discussing some bugs in XQ 2.7.9 that have not been resolved while the >>> version 2.7.8 works perfectly fine and I am running El Capitan 10.11.5. XQ >>> 2.7.9 did not allow me to work with certain commands that needed forwarding >>> over ssh and given the limited people who have been working on that fix >>> this may cause problems for some time. I would strongly recommend from my >>> personal experience to stick with XQ 2.7.8 if you have nothing in >>> particular to gain from upgrading. I hope this helps a bit. Good luck! >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Magda. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Christopher Fick < >>> <mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com> spacecarrider(a)gmail.com<mailto:spacecarrider@gmail.com> <javascript:;><javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>> Hi I'm running XQ 2.7.8, and I see that 2.7.9 is now available. If I >>> check for updates through the XQ "app" it says I'm up to date with 2.7.8. >>>>> So, if I manually download and install 2.7.9 from the website should I >>> just install it over the previous version? >>>>> And on a side note, should I be able to update through 2.7.8, or is >>> it common knowledge that it doesn't work that way since this is more of a >>> framework (for lack of better words) rather than a normal application. >>>>> Macbook Pro Mid 2012 15" >>>>> OSX 10.8.5 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Christopher >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com> <javascript:;><javascript:;>) >>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>>> This email sent to <mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> <javascript:;><javascript:;> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>> X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com> <javascript:;><javascript:;>) >>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >>>>> This email sent to <mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> jeremyhu(a)freedesktop.org<mailto:jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> <javascript:;><javascript:;> >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: <<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.apple.com_archive…>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.apple.com_archive… > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> X11-users mailing list >> <mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com> X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com> >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma… >> >> End of X11-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 35 >> ***************************************** > > Houston Methodist. Leading Medicine. > > Ranked by U.S.News & World Report as one of America's "Best Hospitals" in 11 specialties. Named to FORTUNE® Magazine's "100 Best Companies to Work For®" list 10 years in a row. Designated as a Magnet hospital for excellence in nursing. Visit us at houstonmethodist.org<http://houstonmethodist.org/>. Follow us at twitter.com/MethodistHosp<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_MethodistHo…> and www.facebook.com/HoustonMethodist<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.facebook.com_Housto…>. > > ***CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This e-mail is the property of Houston Methodist Hospital and/or its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/wealthychef%40gmail.com > > This email sent to <mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com> wealthychef(a)gmail.com<mailto:wealthychef@gmail.com> ————— Cheers from Rich Cook =============================== Success is the ability to go from one failure to the next with no loss of enthusiasm. --Winston Churchill _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/magda.tsintou%40gmail.com This email sent to <mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> magda.tsintou(a)gmail.com<mailto:magda.tsintou@gmail.com> ————— Cheers from Rich Cook =============================== Success is the ability to go from one failure to the next with no loss of enthusiasm. --Winston Churchill _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. X11-users mailing list (<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>X11-users(a)lists.apple.com<mailto:X11-users@lists.apple.com>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apple.com_mailma…> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/ambrose.li%40gmail.com This email sent to ambrose.li(a)gmail.com<mailto:ambrose.li@gmail.com> -- Ambrose Li // http://o.gniw.ca<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__o.gniw.ca&d=DQMFaQ&c=Qm…> / <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gniw.ca&d=DQMFaQ&c=QmPt…> http://gniw.ca If you saw this on CE-L: You do not need my permission to quote me, only proper attribution. Always cite your sources, even if you have to anonymize and/or cite it as "personal communication". Houston Methodist. Leading Medicine. Houston Methodist is ranked by U.S.News & World Report as one of America's "Best Hospitals" in 11 specialties and designated as a Magnet hospital for excellence in nursing. Houston Methodist has also been named to FORTUNE® Magazine's "100 Best Companies to Work For®" list for 10 years in a row. Visit us at houstonmethodist.org. Follow us at twitter.com/MethodistHosp and facebook.com/HoustonMethodist. ***CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This e-mail is the property of Houston Methodist and/or its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. Thank you.

1 0

New to Freesurfer; cortical thickness
by Marja Caverlé 26 May '16

26 May '16

Hi All, I am new to Freesurfer and I would like to use it for a project I am working on right now. For this project I have two patient groups of which I have structural MRI scans and a lot of other measures. I hope to get cortical thickness numbers from the scans and compare these with the other measures. Anyway, I am trying to get something done in Freesurfer and it does not really seem to work. I assume I have to do a recon-all -all, but when I try this, I get an error saying that the flag is unrecognised. It probably is a small error, easy to solve, but I already get stuck on it since I am totally new to Freesurfer. Could anyone help me out? Some of my questions are; - Am I correct that recon-all -all already coregisters the scans to template? - What will be the outcome? Will I get pictures, or a table with numbers, and if it is a table, which area's are specified? I have a list of ROIs, but how do I let Freesurfer know I am interested in those areas? - Can I do recon-all -all on a folder with all my patients, or do I have to do it one by one? (There not that much, approximately 12 scans) - Can I do recon-all -all on .nii.gz files? The originals are DICOM, but the problem is that there is just one large DICOM folder, which does not specify which files are part of which scan. I have converted them to .nii.gz since I am a bit familiar with FSL, but I do not know whether this actually works in Freesurfer. - Why do I get the unrecognised flag error? I apologise for these questions, they are probably very easy to answer, but I just don't have a clue yet. Thank you guys. Best, Marja

3 10

request for corrected p-values for mni305 space
by Joseph Dien 26 May '16

26 May '16

Hi, just a user request for corrected p-values for the mni305 space analyses (i.e., sig.voxel.nii.gz files). Thanks! Joe -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joseph Dien, PhD Senior Research Scientist Maryland Neuroimaging Center University of Maryland, College Park E-mail: jdien07(a)mac.com Cell Phone: 202-297-8117 http://joedien.com

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
20
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Freesurfer May 2016