Hi Freesurfer Mailing list,
I'm examining striatal-to-cortical connections using resting state MRI and
diffusion weighted imaging with tractography.
I figured the Choi and Yeo atlases in Freesurfer would be the best choice
for this but I'm having some difficulties implementing them.
Since I'm curious about the anatomical specificity of FC and tracts grown,
I took the conservative versions of the Choi and Yeo atlases and split them
into left-and right hemispheres, and also separated those with multiple
regions in a network (i.e. head of caudate and putamen tail in Choi or MFG,
IPL, and SMA in one network in Yeo) with some clustering software.
The clusters match up the to original version of the conservative (Tight on
the website) well and I intend to use that for FC analyses, but I would
prefer to use the liberal mask for tractography.
Problematically, I've noticed that trying to separate the regions with the
same clustering software on the liberal mask does not separate the regions
the same way it did in the conservative mask (i.e. one cluster may contain
the head of the caudate and part of the putamen).
I probably shouldn't be surprised by this, but I was wondering if you would
mind explaining the way the liberal versions of these masks were created.
or a reasonable alternative, so that I might be able to do the same on the
parcellations I've separated out into ROIs?
I could do simple dilation I suppose, but I would like it to be as close to
the original liberal mask as possible.
--
*Thomas DeRamus*
UAB Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience
Graduate Research Trainee
Civitan International Research Center
1719 6th Ave S, Suite 235J, Birmingham, AL 35233
*Phone*: 205-934-0971 *Email:* tpderamus(a)gmail.com, faustus(a)uab.edu