Dear Anastasia,
I am visually inspecting the output of Tracula, and checking the stats on
pathstats.overall.
For example, in the following image (S_23_...) it can be seen that the
rh.slfp is missing (there is just a very small piece of it). The rest of
the tracts seem to be ok.
In the stats the four xx_Avg_Center values are a NaN, and the value of the
volume and Len_xx are the same, excepting Len_Center, which is zero.
Although there are more statistics, I understand we should convert the
whole line to NaN and not include the data of this specific subject/tract
in the statistics, right? (and should I script it to make it happen always?
- I mean, always that there is Len_Center=0, make everything NaN - ).
[image: Inline image 5]
I did freeview dpath/rh.slfp_PP_avg33_mni_bbr/path.pd.nii.gz as recommended
in a the email list, and the path looks exactly like in this image.
In the next image (S_13_...) there are more problems.
-- rh.slft missing (not showing in the image). Len_Center=0 again.
-- fmajor almost not there, but Len_Center=1
-- lh.ccg much shorter than the rh.ccg
-- very strange looking rh.cab
[image: Inline image 6]
Should I consider all those tracts out of the statistics?
Is there any way to mend those? (if yes, where can I find documentation?)
And last question: I understand that I could control the volume of the
tracts with ICV as it is done for other volumes, but, should I control for
the FA values? What exactly is FA_Avg_Weighted? (sorry, couldn't find any
documentation on that while searching).
Thank you very much again and sorry for long post!
Gari
PS note that I plotted the hippocampus as well because I am analyzing it in
the same study.