Dear Freesurfers,
I compared my QDEC and glm (command line) results, using the same contrast
and threshold, but the size of the red cluster (barely visible on glm) is
quite different. Is this a problem?
Thank you very much!
Sincerely,
Ye
Hi list.
I'm looking mailing list to find responce to this question.
"Estimated Total Intra Cranial Vol" obtained by asegstats2table also included ventricles volume?
I'd like to assess the volumetric changes of a subcortical structures. Do you advise me to consider "Estimated Total Intra Cranial Vol" (with or without ventricles?) or, alternatively, subcortical brain volume?
Thank you very much,
Stefano
Dear Anastasia and FreeSurfers,
I was preprocessing some data using tracula and found this error after
running trac-all -bedp -c dmrirc:
INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /data-02/joana/Last
INFO: Diffusion root is /data-02/joana/tracula/
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer-5.3
WARN: Running FSL's bedbost locally - this might take a while
WARN: It is recommended to run this step on a cluster
bedpostx_mgh -n 2 /data-02/joana/tracula//XXX/dmri
subjectdir is /data-02/joana/tracula/XXX/dmri
Making bedpostx directory structure
Queuing preprocessing stages
Unable to run job: Job was rejected because job requests unknown queue
"short.q".
Exiting.
Queuing parallel processing stage
Unable to run job: Job was rejected because job requests unknown queue
"long.q".
Exiting.
Queuing post processing stage
Unable to run job: denied: "60" is not a valid object name (cannot start
with a digit)
Job was rejected because job requests unknown queue "long.q".
Exiting.
Type /data-02/joana/tracula/3119/dmri.bedpostX/monitor to show progress.
Type /data-02/joana/tracula/3119/dmri.bedpostX/cancel to terminate all the
queued tasks.
You will get an email at the end of the post-processing stage.
So far no slices have been processed. Does anyone know how to solve it?
Thanks!
Hi everyone,
I would like to produce lh.white, lh.area, and lh.curv files of the type
produced by mris_make_surfaces, but where the input is a mask of the left
hemisphere white matter alone.
Specifically, suppose I start with the file lh.wm-mask.nii and use
mri_convert to make lh.wm-mask.mgz. I can then follow the -tessellate and
-fix steps of the -autorecon2 section on the webpage
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ReconAllDevTable
to produce the file lh.orig, one of the required inputs to
mris_make_surfaces.
The only other files required to have mris_make_surfaces produce lh.white,
lh.area, and lh.curv files, seem to be the files filled.mgz, brain.mgz, and
wm.mgz. Since wm.mgz is the output of a call to mri_pretess from the
-segmentation step of the -autorecon2 section, I can create wm.mgz by using
the command
mri_pretess lh.wm-mask.mgz 1 wm.mgz.
My inclination at this point is to create copies of wm.mgz that are given
the names filled.mgz and brain.mgz. I can then run
mris_make_surfaces -whiteonly -noaparc -mgz subjectID lh
and the desired files are produced, but I'm not sure what the effect of
using wm.mgz as both filled.mgz and brain.mgz would have on the output.
Given this setting, my question is: what are the roles played by filled.mgz
an brain.mgz in creating the output of mris_make_surfaces?
Thanks in advance for your help,
David Romano
Hello everyone,
I am trying to gather the curvature (of a frontal ROI created through mri_mergelabels) through mris_anatomical_stats using the following
mris_anatomical_stats -l 1220/label/lh.frontalmerge.label -f frontal_table 1220 lh pial
The table produced doesn't upload well into a spreadsheet (measurements all in one cell). Does anyone know how to make a table that can be uploaded into a spreadsheet?
Thanks!
Tara
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to go through the various steps described on the page:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ReconAllDevTable
and I'm trying to understand part of the -autorecon2 section, and in
particular,
1) how the lh.orig.nofix file that is produced by the end of the
-tessellate subsection is different from the the lh.white file that is
produced by the -white subsection, and
2) whether the area and curvature files produced by the command
Hi Miggy
can you cc the list so that others can answer? The two atlases we provide
are described in:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ftp/articles/fischl04-parcellation.pdfhttps://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ftp/articles/desikan06-parcellation.pdfhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2937159/pdf/nihms213933.pdf
and yes, I guess you could edit the ribbon.mgz and then convert it back to
wm.mgz. You'll need to make sure that the "on" edits are turned to 255 and
the "off" ones to 1 (not 0) for things to work properly
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013,
Miggy Chuapoco wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
> Thanks for the help. To explain a bit more about the first issue, we convert
> ribbon.mgz into a a nifti file using a script in matlab, which we then edit
> in ITK-SNAP to fix the segmentation. Typically from there we use a program
> called mrVista to create meshes and do other data analysis depending on what
> we need to do. However, we are doing group averaging for the first time and
> we would like to use these fixed segmentations that we have in the group
> averaging, and not the raw segmentations from recon-all. I was curious to
> know that if I were able to convert the nifti file that we have edited back
> into an .mgz file, would we be able to theoretically obtain a new wm.mgz
> file and run autorecon2-wm. Let me know if that makes sense.
>
> With regards to the second issue, which atlas is used in the
> make_average_subject process and where would I be able to find a list of the
> annotation files within each atlas?
>
> Thanks for your help!
> Miggy
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
> Hi Miggy,
>
> not sure about your first issue as the ribbon is the gray matter
> and the wm.mgz is white matter, so how would edits in one change
> the other?
>
> For the second one, there is a flag in mris_register that allows
> you to draw a label on an individual subject and indicate what
> parcellation unit is should be in the average. The syntax is:
>
>
> mris_register -l <label file> <gcsa file> <annotation name> ...
>
> where
>
> <label_file> is the label you draw on the individual (e.g. in
> tksurfer)
> <gcas_file> Â is one of our standard atlases, listed in
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â $FREESURFER_HOME/average/*.gcs
> <annotation name> is the name of the annotation in the atlas
> that the label should map to (e.g. S_central in the Destrieux
> atlas)
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2013, Miggy Chuapoco wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to make a group average of a set of
> subjects that we've collected
> various functional data on and use anatomical
> landmarks of the group average
> surface to predict the locations of functional areas
> that we've found to be
> correlated to the anatomy of the ventral cortex. As
> such, we'd like to get
> as accurate of an average surface as possible. I've
> come up on two problems
> that I'd like to address and was wondering if anyone
> could help come up with
> a solution.Â
>
> I ran the recon-all command on all the subjects and
> created a segmentation,
> however we made edits to the segmentation using
> ITK-SNAP, and not tkmedit.
> Some of the changes were fairly drastic and we'd
> like to use the fixed
> segmentations in the averaging process. I've
> considered perhaps running the
> -autorecon2-wm flag, but unfortunately using
> ITK-SNAP essentially makes
> edits to ribbon.mgz, and not wm.mgz. I was wondering
> if there was a way to
> "extract" Â a new wm.mgz from an edited ribbon.mgz.Â
>
> My second problem involves trying to anchor a sulcus
> on the ventral surface
> during the averaging process (the mid-fusiform
> sulcus) in hopes of getting a
> more accurate representation of the sulcus on the
> average surface. As it
> stands there is a bit too much variability of the
> average MFS location when
> compared to the individual subjects' MFS location,
> and we'd like to reduce
> that if possible. Is there any way of using a label,
> or something similar,
> that can be considered as an "anchor" during the
> averaging process?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Miggy Chuapoco
>
>
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
> it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
> in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
> and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
>
I wanted to bump this:
I have license errors with FS 5.3 that don't appear for
equivalently-configured FS 5.1 and FS 4.5 installations. How shall I
troubleshoot?
SYMPTOMS:
$ mri_convert $FREESURFER_HOME/subjects/bert/mri/T1.mgz T1.mgz
mri_convert
/space/opt/freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0-full/subjects/bert/mri/T1.mgz
T1.mgz
$Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.7 2012/09/05 21:55:16 mreuter Exp $
reading from
/space/opt/freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0-full/subjects/bert/mri/T1.mgz...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ERROR: Invalid FreeSurfer license key found in license file
/space/opt/freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0-full/.license
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ bugr
FREESURFER_HOME:
/space/opt/freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0-full
Build stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0
RedHat release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.9 (Tikanga)
Kernel info: Linux 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5 x86_64
LICENSE
The license file is the same as we use for our other FS installations,
which work. I've also tried copying it from .license to license, which
didn't solve the problem.
Please let me know if you have any leads or suggestions.
*stephen v. shepherd phd*
The Rockefeller University / 1230 York Avenue / New York NY 10065-6307 USA
// 212.327.7620
1
0
Qdec Help
by Muhammad Naveed Iqbal Qureshi
05 Sep '13
05 Sep '13
Dear List Members,
When I try to run the qdec I got following error,
Please tell me how to rectify it.
bmssa-desktop:~/freesurfer/subjects> qdec
qdec.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libXss.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Muhammad
Naveed Iqbal Qureshi
P please don't print this e-mail unless
you really need to
Dear list membes,
Please guide me how to create the qdec.table.dat for my own mri data.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Muhammad
Naveed Iqbal Qureshi
P please don't print this e-mail unless
you really need to