Freesurfer

freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

12 participants
30094 discussions

Re: [Freesurfer] V6beta: recon-all --noasegfusion does not initialize using longbase aseg.mgz; how to handle aseg edits in longitudinal stream
by Antonin Skoch 19 Jan '17

19 Jan '17

Dear Martin, one more thing: When the error is large and present in both timepoints (as is my case), I think that necessity of editing the same error in both timepoints can easily lead to error (maybe even demonstrated as false positive effect) caused by non-systematic editing. When editing comprises many voxels one cannot realistically assure the perfect consistence in editing. Editing only once (in base) and initialize mri_ca_label in long from base can avoid this problem. So I think the initialization of mri_ca_label from base is not a bad option for such cases. What do you think? Antonin Hi Antonin, the -noasegfusion is not really supported and a left over from initial testing when we first developed the stream. I will take a look at it and probably remove the flag (or implement it in a way that it really initializes with the aseg from the base, although I think this is not desirable, unless one really assumes there is no/ or very little change between time points. About aseg edits in longitudinal processing, please look at our edit wiki page: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalEdits#aseg.mgz <https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalEdits#aseg.mgz> “ ASEG edits can be done in cross, base and long. Recommendation: Edit in long only if you want to correct the volume of important structures. Edit in base if surfaces need to be changed due to incorrect labeling of aseg. Not necessary to edit in cross. The segmentation in the long runs is initialized with a fused aseg (a weighted average of the cross sectional asegs). Thus any edits done to the cross sectionals are incorporated indirectly into the long stream. But since the fused aseg is used only for the initialization, it can happen that manual edits from the cross get removed again. Therefore, to correct the volume, just edit the long." So for your ventricle correction, you could either clean up the cross data and hope it caries over to the long (it should), or directly edit the long aseg. Best, Martin > On 16 Jan 2017, at 23:23, Antonin Skoch <a...(a)ikem.cz> wrote: > > Dear experts, > > I am testing the longitudinal stream with V6beta version. > > The recon-all -help says for -noasegfusion: > > Do not create 'fused' aseg from the longbase timepoints, which would normally > be used to initialize the ca_labeling. Instead, initialize using the longbase > aseg.mgz. > > As I looked to recon-all code it seems that in case of -noasegfusion there is > no use of -r and -ri parameters and therefore no "initialization". Could you > please comment on? > > My second query is regarding manual edits: > > In one subject the manual editing of aseg was necessary due to ventricle > mislabeling. I edited the aseg.presurf in base template and subsequently run > longitudinal stream via > > recon-all -long tpID templateID -noasegfusion -all > > From the last sentence of -noasegfusion help I (wrongly) expected that my > aseg.presurf edits in base template would be incorporated for -long recon. > However, this was not the case, the edits have not been incorporated at all. > Looking at the recon-all code the aseg.presurf from base is never used for > -long. > > I thought that I could incorporate manual edits from base by manual copying > of aseg.presurf from base to long directory. As I looked for the way how the > manual aseg edits are handled in recon-all, they are identified by using the > difference between the files aseg.auto and aseg.manedit which contains manual > edits. Therefore I think that the copying from base is not an option, I > expect that this would replace segmentations not only in manual edit regions, > but in all regions where the aseg.auto of base and aseg.auto of -long differs > (they do not have the same input) which is undesirable. So I think I do not > have any other option than to edit aseg.presurf in -long again. > > Could you please comment on how to optimally handle such situations? > > Regards, > > Antonin Skoch > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

2 1

(no subject)
by Hao wen 19 Jan '17

19 Jan '17

Hello: I am using QATool in Freesurfer, and the script requires FS 5.1 and also works for 5.3 which i am using, but when i run it, it always gives me error about license: ERROR: FreeSurfer license file /Applications/freesurfer/.license not found. But FS 5.3 works fine with the license file license.txt, so I just copy the content of license.txt to .license in the dir of $FREESURFER_HOME, and it still gives me this error, here is the content of these two license files: Password: alexandre.routier(a)gmail.com 24787 *CZJRu8f2ozyc FShcQvYXXTGaI any idea? Thanks in advance

1 0

Re: [Freesurfer] PETSURFER Tutorial Problems <Repost>
by Anderson Napolitano 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

Hi Zeke, That resolved the issue. Thank you very much. Warmest Regards, Anderson Napolitano ________________________________________ From: freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of freesurfer-request(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-request(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 10:00 AM To: freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Freesurfer Digest, Vol 155, Issue 27 Send Freesurfer mailing list submissions to freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to freesurfer-request(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu You can reach the person managing the list at freesurfer-owner(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Freesurfer digest..." Today's Topics: 1. installation fail :( (Shapiro, Allison L) 2. Re: TRACULA in FreeSurfer 6.0 trac-paths error (Derek A Pisner) 3. PETSURFER Tutorial Problems <Repost> (Anderson Napolitano) 4. question about cortical volume group analyses (Ritobrato Datta) 5. Re: V6beta: recon-all --noasegfusion does not initialize using longbase aseg.mgz; how to handle aseg edits in longitudinal stream (Antonin Skoch) 6. FS Anatomic ROIs Atlas (Da, Xiao) 7. Anatomical ROI parcellation (Aya Kabbara) 8. Re: Anatomical ROI parcellation (Anthony Dick) 9. Re: FS Anatomic ROIs Atlas (Douglas N Greve) 10. Re: V6beta: recon-all --noasegfusion does not initialize using longbase aseg.mgz; how to handle aseg edits in longitudinal stream (Antonin Skoch) 11. WM lobes and Corpus Callosum (Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad)) 12. Re: WM lobes and Corpus Callosum (Yendiki, Anastasia) 13. Re: mri_vol2surf (Zhivago) 14. 'nuisance factors adjusted' values (hiroki.sato(a)med.tohoku.ac.jp) 15. recon-all error (Freesurfer) ( Gwang-Won Kim ) 16. Question (N Saf) 17. Re: mri_vol2surf (Bruce Fischl) 18. Neuroimaging postdoctoral position (Tiril Pedersen Gurholt) 19. Re: Question (Bruce Fischl) 20. mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header (Sneha Pandya) 21. Re: mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header (Bruce Fischl) 22. Re: Fwd: QDEC versus Terminal annotation (Douglas N Greve) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:50:29 +0000 From: "Shapiro, Allison L" <ALLISON.SHAPIRO(a)ucdenver.edu> Subject: [Freesurfer] installation fail :( To: "freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Message-ID: <CB7C3006-2F82-44E5-BE71-0A5354DF90B6(a)ucdenver.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Dear FreeSurfer support, I am a new user of the Freesurfer program and attempted to install everything this morning on my Mac OSx 10.11.6 (El Capitan). To preface everything, I updated my XQuartz program before installing, and I do not have Matlab on this computer and understand that I can?t use the fMRI functionality without this, but this is not my goal. The installation appeared to go as planned, but when I went to test the installation with the commands: $> <source_freesurfer> $> freeview -v $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/mri/brainmask.mgz -v $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/mri/aseg.mgz:colormap=lut:opacity=0.2 -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/surf/lh.white:edgecolor=yellow -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/surf/rh.white:edgecolor=yellow -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/surf/lh.pial:annot=aparc:edgecolor=red -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/surf/rh.pial:annot=aparc:edgecolor=red I received the following error: -bash: $: command not found I was not able to decipher this error with The Google, so I am hoping that you can help. Thank you so much for your time! Best Wishes, Allie Allison L B Shapiro, MPH, PhD Postdoctoral Research Fellow LEAD Center | Colorado School of Public Health Office 303.724.7708 ?Those who dare to fail miserably can achieve greatly? - JFK

1 0

Roi parcellation
by Aya Kabbara 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

Thank you.. Actually, I realized that using tksurfer I can do a manual parcellation. However, I need an automatic parcellation. Is there a way? Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

3 2

Postdoc position and PhD studentships available at Cardiff, UK {Disarmed}
by Jiaxiang ZHANG 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

[Apologize for cross-posting] Dear all, We are seeking applicants for 1 postdoc position and 2 fully-funded PhD studentships at Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC). These posts link to a project funded by the European Research Council (ERC). The successful candidates will work with Dr Jiaxiang Zhang and other collaborators to understand the neural mechanisms of intentional decision, using multimodal brain imaging and brain stimulation. We encourage applicants from different disciplines, including cognitive neuroscience, imaging neuroscience, psychology, computer science, mathematics or physics. Job specs and application details are available online (see links below). For informal enquiries about the project, please contact Dr Jiaxiang Zhang ( zhangj73(a)cardiff.ac.uk) with your CV. A. 3-year postdoc position (Deadline: Feb 16, 2017) http://krb-sjobs.brassring.com/TGWEbHost/jobdetails.aspx?par tnerid=30011&siteid=5460&AReq=5577BR B. 3.5-year PhD studentship 1, focusing on MEG (Deadline: Feb 1, 2017) https://www.findaphd.com/search/ProjectDetails.aspx?PJID=80235&LID=281 <http://krb-sjobs.brassring.com/TGWEbHost/jobdetails.aspx?partnerid=30011&si…> C. 3-year PhD studentship 2 (Deadline: Feb 24, 2017) https://www.findaphd.com/search/ProjectDetails.aspx?PJID=82157&LID=281 The successful candidates will be based at CUBRIC. CUBRIC houses a unique combination of state-of-the-art facilities and world-leading expertise, with 4 human MRI systems (2 x Siemens Prisma, 1 x Siemens Connectom, 1 x Siemens 7T), MEG, EEG, TMS, tDCS, clinical research units and testing labs. Further details of CUBRIC can be found on our web-page ( http://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/cubric) Dr. Jiaxiang Zhang Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC) School of Psychology Cardiff University Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ Lab: http://ccbrain.org Faculty: http://psych.cf.ac.uk/zhang Email: zhangj73(a)cardiff.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)29 2087 0471 <+44%2029%202087%200471>

1 0

volume based GLM group analysis(whole brain and ROI).
by miracle ozzoude 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

Hello Freesurfer, I would like to do a GLM volume based analysis using the cortical volumes from desikan atlas (structural not functional). However, I can't find the steps/tutorials on how to do this on the freesurfer website. Does anyone know how to do this using freesurfer? Basically, I want to perform analysis similar to surface based cortical thickness ( https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/GroupAnalysis) Thank you. Best, Paul

1 0

installation fail :(
by Shapiro, Allison L 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

Dear FreeSurfer support, I am a new user of the Freesurfer program and attempted to install everything this morning on my Mac OSx 10.11.6 (El Capitan). To preface everything, I updated my XQuartz program before installing, and I do not have Matlab on this computer and understand that I can’t use the fMRI functionality without this, but this is not my goal. The installation appeared to go as planned, but when I went to test the installation with the commands: $> <source_freesurfer> $> freeview -v $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/mri/brainmask.mgz -v $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/mri/aseg.mgz:colormap=lut:opacity=0.2 -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/surf/lh.white:edgecolor=yellow -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/surf/rh.white:edgecolor=yellow -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/surf/lh.pial:annot=aparc:edgecolor=red -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/surf/rh.pial:annot=aparc:edgecolor=red I received the following error: -bash: $: command not found I was not able to decipher this error with The Google, so I am hoping that you can help. Thank you so much for your time! Best Wishes, Allie Allison L B Shapiro, MPH, PhD Postdoctoral Research Fellow LEAD Center | Colorado School of Public Health Office 303.724.7708 “Those who dare to fail miserably can achieve greatly” - JFK

2 1

question about cortical volume group analyses
by Ritobrato Datta 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

Hi All, I have a analysed data from AD patients and healthy controls and want to do a group analyses of cortical volume. I have run qcache on each subject. In the lh.volume.fsaverage.mris_preproc.log file, mri_surf2surf --srcsubject AD1 --srchemi lh --srcsurfreg sphere.reg --trgsubject fsaverage --trghemi lh --trgsurfreg sphere.reg --tval ./tmp.mris_preproc.76769/AD1.1.mgh --sval /Applications/freesurfer5.1/subjects/AD1/surf/lh.volume --jac --sfmt curv --noreshape --no-cortex what does -jac jacobian correction mean ? Is it accounting/correcting for differences in hemispheric volume ? I want to do a group analyses between AD and controls for cortical volume, can I just use the lh.volume.fwhm??.fsaverage.mgh at different smoothing kernels ? Do I need to correct for whole brain volume or some scaling or is it already taken care of ? Are there references that have used free surfer to report group analyses for cortical volume ? Can someone point to a few ? Thanks Ri

2 2

Recommended method of using data with variable sizes
by Alex Cohen 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

Hi all, What is the current best practice recommendation for using multiple T1s and/or T2s for recon-all where the sizes of the images are slightly different. For instance: two T1w images of 0.9x0.9x0.9 and 1x1x1 resolution, however the 1x1x1 image seems to have better grey-white separation, etc... Separately, am I correct in my assessment that presently freesurfer will only use 1 T2 or FLAIR image and isn't doing averaging? -Alex ---------------------------------------------------------------- Alexander Li Cohen, M.D., Ph.D. E-mail: Alexander.Cohen2(a)childrens.harvard.edu (Medical/Science Email) E-mail: alexcohen(a)gmail.com (Lifetime Email) ---------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:10 PM, <freesurfer-request(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > Send Freesurfer mailing list submissions to > freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freesurfer-request(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freesurfer-owner(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Freesurfer digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header (Sneha Pandya) > 2. Re: mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header (Bruce Fischl) > 3. Re: WM lobes and Corpus Callosum (Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad)) > 4. Re: WM lobes and Corpus Callosum (Yendiki, Anastasia) > 5. Re: mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header (Sneha Pandya) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Sneha Pandya <snp2003(a)med.cornell.edu> > To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Cc: > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:11:17 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header > > Hi Bruce, > > > Total is 231111108 kB from /proc/meminfo and flair vozel size is 1.0000, > 0.9766, 0.9766. > > > I ran quite a few recon-all after this one failed and it did not complain. > It just fails when I run recon-all -autorecon3 with -bbr-init-header flag. > > Thanks, > Sneha > ------------------------------ > *From:* freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu < > freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Bruce Fischl < > fischl(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:09:36 AM > *To:* Freesurfer support list > *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header > > Hi Sneha > > how much RAM do you have in your machine? And what is the resolution of > your data? > > cheers > Bruce > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sneha Pandya wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have successfully ran recon-all on my subjects with multiple T1s. We > want > > to use flair to refine pial surfaces as for all the subjects pial > surfaces > > are messy and will demand lots of control point edits. > > > > > > > > After successfully running entire recon-all stream I am running following > > command to incorporate flair: > > > > > > recon-all -autorecon3 \ > > -s SUBJ \ > > -bbr-init-header \ > > -FLAIRpial \ > > -bigventricles \ > > -openmp 12 \ > > -qcache > > > > When I run above command recon-all exits while implementing > > mris_make_surfaces with an error "Cannot allocate memory" > > > > Can someone guide what is happening? Is it that there are large > topological > > error or bbr-init-header flag will only run if I run recon-all from > > autorecon1 to autorecon3 stage? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sneha > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bruce Fischl <fischl(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Cc: > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:20:07 -0500 (EST) > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header > hmmm, can you send us the recon-all.log file? > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sneha Pandya wrote: > > >> Hi Bruce, >> >> >> Total is 231111108 kB from /proc/meminfo and flair vozel size is 1.0000, >> 0.9766, 0.9766. >> >> >> I ran quite a few recon-all after this one failed and it did not complain. >> It just fails when I run recon-all -autorecon3 with -bbr-init-header flag. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Sneha >> >> ____________________________________________________________ >> ________________ >> From: freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> <freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Bruce Fischl >> <fischl(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:09:36 AM >> To: Freesurfer support list >> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header >> Hi Sneha >> >> how much RAM do you have in your machine? And what is the resolution of >> your data? >> >> cheers >> Bruce >> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sneha Pandya wrote: >> >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > >> > I have successfully ran recon-all on my subjects with multiple T1s. We >> want >> > to use flair to refine pial surfaces as for all the subjects pial >> surfaces >> > are messy and will demand lots of control point edits. >> > >> > >> > >> > After successfully running entire recon-all stream I am running >> following >> > command to incorporate flair: >> > >> > >> > recon-all -autorecon3 \ >> > -s SUBJ \ >> > -bbr-init-header \ >> > -FLAIRpial \ >> > -bigventricles \ >> > -openmp 12 \ >> > -qcache >> > >> > When I run above command recon-all exits while implementing >> > mris_make_surfaces with an error "Cannot allocate memory" >> > >> > Can someone guide what is happening? Is it that there are large >> topological >> > error or bbr-init-header flag will only run if I run recon-all from >> > autorecon1 to autorecon3 stage? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Sneha >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad)" <prad(a)email.arizona.edu> > To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Cc: > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:48:13 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum > > Hello Anastasia, > > > Thank you for your reply! > > > I had created the 4 WM lobes for each hemisphere to extract regional > volumes for white matter lesions in each lobe. > > > As some of our participants have WML in the corpus callosum very close to > the midline, they are not included in the WM lobes created earlier. > > > Do I need to manually edit the labels for the parts of the corpus > callosum between the hemispheres to have them be included in one of the > lobes ? > > > Or is there some alternate way to split the CC in aseg.mgz along > the hemispheric midline and assign its parts to the WM in each hemisphere ? > > > > Best, > > -Prad > > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu < > freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Yendiki, Anastasia < > AYENDIKI(a)mgh.harvard.edu> > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 17, 2017 5:05 PM > *To:* Freesurfer support list > *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum > > Hi Prad - mri_aparc2aseg assigns WM voxels to the nearest cortical region > from the cortical parcellation. Which cortical region would you want to > assign the corpus callosum to? What's labeled as corpus callosum in the > aseg is the part of the corpus callosum between the 2 hemis. > > Best, > a.y > > ------------------------------ > *From:* freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [ > freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Bharadwaj, Pradyumna > - (prad) [prad(a)email.arizona.edu] > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 17, 2017 5:37 PM > *To:* freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > *Subject:* [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum > > Hi, > > > I've been trying to create WM lobes using the following steps: > > > 1) mri_annotation2label --lobesStrict > > 2) Outputting the labels from step 1, & creating a simpler annotation > without limbic and insular lobes > > 3) Labeling the WM using mri_aparc2aseg (mri_aparc2aseg --s MySub --annot > Step2AnnotationFile --labelwm --hypo-as-wm --wmpar-dmax 20 --rip-unknown > > > However, as the corpus callosum is not labelled as wm, it is not included > in any WM lobe. > > > Is there any workaround to assigning the corpus callosum to the different > WM lobes or do I have to manually edit aseg.mgz to change the corpus > callosum's value to match that of WM ? > > > > Thanks, > > -Prad > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Yendiki, Anastasia" <AYENDIKI(a)mgh.harvard.edu> > To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Cc: > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:56:12 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum > Hi Prad - That part of the corpus callosum belongs neither to the left nor > to the right hemi, it connects the two. So any split would be arbitrary. > You could write a script that finds if a voxel is closer to the left or the > right hemi for example. > > Best, > a.y > > ------------------------------ > *From:* freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [ > freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Bharadwaj, Pradyumna > - (prad) [prad(a)email.arizona.edu] > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2017 12:48 PM > *To:* Freesurfer support list > *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum > > Hello Anastasia, > > > Thank you for your reply! > > > I had created the 4 WM lobes for each hemisphere to extract regional > volumes for white matter lesions in each lobe. > > > As some of our participants have WML in the corpus callosum very close to > the midline, they are not included in the WM lobes created earlier. > > > Do I need to manually edit the labels for the parts of the corpus > callosum between the hemispheres to have them be included in one of the > lobes ? > > > Or is there some alternate way to split the CC in aseg.mgz along > the hemispheric midline and assign its parts to the WM in each hemisphere ? > > > > Best, > > -Prad > > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu < > freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Yendiki, Anastasia < > AYENDIKI(a)mgh.harvard.edu> > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 17, 2017 5:05 PM > *To:* Freesurfer support list > *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum > > Hi Prad - mri_aparc2aseg assigns WM voxels to the nearest cortical region > from the cortical parcellation. Which cortical region would you want to > assign the corpus callosum to? What's labeled as corpus callosum in the > aseg is the part of the corpus callosum between the 2 hemis. > > Best, > a.y > > ------------------------------ > *From:* freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [ > freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Bharadwaj, Pradyumna > - (prad) [prad(a)email.arizona.edu] > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 17, 2017 5:37 PM > *To:* freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > *Subject:* [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum > > Hi, > > > I've been trying to create WM lobes using the following steps: > > > 1) mri_annotation2label --lobesStrict > > 2) Outputting the labels from step 1, & creating a simpler annotation > without limbic and insular lobes > > 3) Labeling the WM using mri_aparc2aseg (mri_aparc2aseg --s MySub --annot > Step2AnnotationFile --labelwm --hypo-as-wm --wmpar-dmax 20 --rip-unknown > > > However, as the corpus callosum is not labelled as wm, it is not included > in any WM lobe. > > > Is there any workaround to assigning the corpus callosum to the different > WM lobes or do I have to manually edit aseg.mgz to change the corpus > callosum's value to match that of WM ? > > > > Thanks, > > -Prad > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Sneha Pandya <snp2003(a)med.cornell.edu> > To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Cc: > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:10:19 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header > > Sure, please find it attached. > > > Thanks, > > Sneha > > ------------------------------ > *From:* freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu < > freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Bruce Fischl < > fischl(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2017 12:20 PM > *To:* Freesurfer support list > *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header > > hmmm, can you send us the recon-all.log file? > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sneha Pandya wrote: > > > > > Hi Bruce, > > > > > > Total is 231111108 kB from /proc/meminfo and flair vozel size is 1.0000, > > 0.9766, 0.9766. > > > > > > I ran quite a few recon-all after this one failed and it did not > complain. > > It just fails when I run recon-all -autorecon3 with -bbr-init-header > flag. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Sneha > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ________________ > > From: freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > <freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Bruce Fischl > > <fischl(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:09:36 AM > > To: Freesurfer support list > > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with bbr-init-header > > Hi Sneha > > > > how much RAM do you have in your machine? And what is the resolution of > > your data? > > > > cheers > > Bruce > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sneha Pandya wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > I have successfully ran recon-all on my subjects with multiple T1s. We > > want > > > to use flair to refine pial surfaces as for all the subjects pial > surfaces > > > are messy and will demand lots of control point edits. > > > > > > > > > > > > After successfully running entire recon-all stream I am running > following > > > command to incorporate flair: > > > > > > > > > recon-all -autorecon3 \ > > > -s SUBJ \ > > > -bbr-init-header \ > > > -FLAIRpial \ > > > -bigventricles \ > > > -openmp 12 \ > > > -qcache > > > > > > When I run above command recon-all exits while implementing > > > mris_make_surfaces with an error "Cannot allocate memory" > > > > > > Can someone guide what is happening? Is it that there are large > > topological > > > error or bbr-init-header flag will only run if I run recon-all from > > > autorecon1 to autorecon3 stage? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Sneha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it > is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in > error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > dispose of the e-mail. > >

2 5

PETSURFER Tutorial Problems <Repost>
by Anderson Napolitano 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

Good Afternoon Support Team, Per step one of your PETSURFER tutorial, the command: gtmseg --s <subject>?, where the <subject> is the name of the subject that we had ran recon-all, outputs the error as described in out.txt attached in this email. If you have the time, it would be much appreciated if you can help us resolve this issue. Thank you for your time. Warmest Regards, Anderson Napolitano?

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Freesurfer