Hi all,
I would like to add fieldsigns across multiple retinotopy sessions in the
same subject, in order to get a metric of the reliability of the mapping.
However, when I tried to do this in one subject, I found that fieldsigns
from two sessions largely canceled one another out. This led to a
discussion in our lab of whether the fieldsign 1) has a consistent meaning
across sessions and subjects, or 2) whether the fieldsign in a given region,
say V1, may switch from positive to negative due to noise or between-subject
differences. For example, a colleague speculated that paint-sess could
start with +1 at an arbitrary starting point on the edge of an occipital
patch, then flip the sign whenever the polar angle/eccentricity gradients
reversed themselves. Thus, V5 might be +1, V4 = -1, V3 = +1, V2 = -1, and
V1 would be +1. However, if noise in a given session resulted in a failure
to detect V4, then V1 would end up being the opposite fieldsign, -1. Is
this correct? If so, then I might be shooting myself in the foot by adding
fieldsign maps from different sessions. I would really appreciate any
insight about how the fieldsign is assigned, and whether circumstances like
the ones I describe could cause it to flip for a given functional region.
Thanks,
Jeff Phillips