Dear Freesurfers, I just read this paper about freesurfer version and operating system matters: Gronenschild EHBM, Habets P, Jacobs HIL, Mengelers R, Rozendaal N, et al. (2012) The Effects of FreeSurfer Version, Workstation Type, and Macintosh Operating System Version on Anatomical Volume and Cortical Thickness Measurements. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38234. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038234 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0038234 I am running freesurfer on linux system, and installed both version 4.5 and 5.1, and currently using 5.1. So which version is most recommended? should I use other versions like 5.0 or the coming 5.2? Any suggestion is appreciated
5.2 if you can wait a bit Bruce
On Oct 28, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Chunhui Chen chenchunhuichina@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Freesurfers, I just read this paper about freesurfer version and operating system matters: Gronenschild EHBM, Habets P, Jacobs HIL, Mengelers R, Rozendaal N, et al. (2012) The Effects of FreeSurfer Version, Workstation Type, and Macintosh Operating System Version on Anatomical Volume and Cortical Thickness Measurements. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38234. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038234 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0038234 I am running freesurfer on linux system, and installed both version 4.5 and 5.1, and currently using 5.1. So which version is most recommended? should I use other versions like 5.0 or the coming 5.2? Any suggestion is appreciated _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thanks Bruce and Cesar! The problem is I have analyzed a part of my data with 5.1, and I am collecting new data, so I am wandering should I also analyze new data with 5.1, or should I rerun old data (as well as new data) with 5.2.
Now it seem to me that keep it consistent is most important and should be OK, but 5.2 may be better?
Thanks again!
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
5.2 if you can wait a bit Bruce
On Oct 28, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Chunhui Chen chenchunhuichina@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Freesurfers, I just read this paper about freesurfer version and operating system matters: Gronenschild EHBM, Habets P, Jacobs HIL, Mengelers R, Rozendaal N, et al. (2012) The Effects of FreeSurfer Version, Workstation Type, and Macintosh Operating System Version on Anatomical Volume and Cortical Thickness Measurements. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38234. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038234 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0038234 I am running freesurfer on linux system, and installed both version 4.5 and 5.1, and currently using 5.1. So which version is most recommended? should I use other versions like 5.0 or the coming 5.2? Any suggestion is appreciated
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
5.1 has some problems with Talairach xforms, so you might be better off just rerunning. Unless this hasn't been an issue for you (it seems to be contrast dependent), in which case you could stick with 5.1 On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Chunhui Chen wrote:
Thanks Bruce and Cesar! The problem is I have analyzed a part of my data with 5.1, and I am collecting new data, so I am wandering should I also analyze new data with 5.1, or should I rerun old data (as well as new data) with 5.2. Now it seem to me that keep it consistent is most important and should be OK, but 5.2 may be better? Thanks again!
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: 5.2 if you can wait a bit Bruce
On Oct 28, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Chunhui Chen chenchunhuichina@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Freesurfers,I just read this paper about freesurfer version and operating system matters: Gronenschild EHBM, Habets P, Jacobs HIL, Mengelers R, Rozendaal N, et al. (2012) The Effects of FreeSurfer Version, Workstation Type, and Macintosh Operating System Version on Anatomical Volume and Cortical Thickness Measurements. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38234. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038234 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0038234 I am running freesurfer on linux system, and installed both version 4.5 and 5.1, and currently using 5.1. So which version is most recommended? should I use other versions like 5.0 or the coming 5.2? Any suggestion is appreciated
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurferThe information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Got you. Thank you!
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
5.1 has some problems with Talairach xforms, so you might be better off just rerunning. Unless this hasn't been an issue for you (it seems to be contrast dependent), in which case you could stick with 5.1
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Chunhui Chen wrote:
Thanks Bruce and Cesar!
The problem is I have analyzed a part of my data with 5.1, and I am collecting new data, so I am wandering should I also analyze new data with 5.1, or should I rerun old data (as well as new data) with 5.2.
Now it seem to me that keep it consistent is most important and should be OK, but 5.2 may be better?
Thanks again!
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Bruce Fischl < fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: 5.2 if you can wait a bit Bruce
On Oct 28, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Chunhui Chen chenchunhuichina@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Freesurfers,I just read this paper about freesurfer version and operating system matters: Gronenschild EHBM, Habets P, Jacobs HIL, Mengelers R, Rozendaal N, et al. (2012) The Effects of FreeSurfer Version, Workstation Type, and Macintosh Operating System Version on Anatomical Volume and Cortical Thickness Measurements. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38234. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.**0038234 http://www.plosone.org/**article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%** 2Fjournal.pone.0038234http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0038234 I am running freesurfer on linux system, and installed both version 4.5 and 5.1, and currently using 5.1. So which version is most recommended? should I use other versions like 5.0 or the coming 5.2? Any suggestion is appreciated
______________________________**_________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/**freesurfer<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Bruce Fischl -
Chunhui Chen