Dear all,
I am creating a hand-drawn label of the Intraparietal sulcus on fsaverge.
When I register it to an individual brain (mri_label2label), the area is incorrectly registered and comprises adjacent brain structures that I am not interested in analyzing (specially the neighboring sulci).
I know that registration works with my data in general, since other regions (manually drawn on fsaverage, i.e. various pre-motor areas) are correctly registered.
is there any bias or "reduced" accuracy when registering regions of interest located at the parietal cortex?
I am aware that aparc2009 comprises an area called "S_inrapriet_and_P_trans", but I've found that this label is not restricted to the sulcus (in individual segmentations).
Any help would be appreciated!
Hi Bastien
maybe it would be easier and more accurate to extract the S_inrapriet_and_P_trans then use sulc to remove any vertices that are < 0 (that is, are not sulcal)?
cheers Bruce
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Bastian Cheng wrote:
Dear all,
I am creating a hand-drawn label of the Intraparietal sulcus on fsaverge.
When I register it to an individual brain (mri_label2label), the area is incorrectly registered and comprises adjacent brain structures that I am not interested in analyzing (specially the neighboring sulci).
I know that registration works with my data in general, since other regions (manually drawn on fsaverage, i.e. various pre-motor areas) are correctly registered.
is there any bias or "reduced" accuracy when registering regions of interest located at the parietal cortex?
I am aware that aparc2009 comprises an area called "S_inrapriet_and_P_trans", but I've found that this label is not restricted to the sulcus (in individual segmentations).
Any help would be appreciated! _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi Bruce!
sounds good, thank you!
is there a specific command to do that? I would guess that I would have to mask the sulc image with my label (S-intrapariet_and_P_trans)
Bastian
On 29 April 2016 at 14:46, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Bastien
maybe it would be easier and more accurate to extract the S_inrapriet_and_P_trans then use sulc to remove any vertices that are < 0 (that is, are not sulcal)?
cheers Bruce
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Bastian Cheng wrote:
Dear all,
I am creating a hand-drawn label of the Intraparietal sulcus on fsaverge.
When I register it to an individual brain (mri_label2label), the area is incorrectly registered and comprises adjacent brain structures that I am not interested in analyzing (specially the neighboring sulci).
I know that registration works with my data in general, since other regions (manually drawn on fsaverage, i.e. various pre-motor areas) are correctly registered.
is there any bias or "reduced" accuracy when registering regions of interest located at the parietal cortex?
I am aware that aparc2009 comprises an area called "S_inrapriet_and_P_trans", but I've found that this label is not restricted to the sulcus (in individual segmentations).
Any help would be appreciated! _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
not that I know of, but Doug might have something. I would do it in matlab I guess
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016, Bastian Cheng wrote:
Hi Bruce!
sounds good, thank you!
is there a specific command to do that? I would guess that I would have to mask the sulc image with my label (S-intrapariet_and_P_trans)
Bastian
On 29 April 2016 at 14:46, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Bastien
maybe it would be easier and more accurate to extract the S_inrapriet_and_P_trans then use sulc to remove any vertices that are < 0 (that is, are not sulcal)?
cheers Bruce
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Bastian Cheng wrote:
Dear all,
I am creating a hand-drawn label of the Intraparietal sulcus on fsaverge.
When I register it to an individual brain (mri_label2label), the area is incorrectly registered and comprises adjacent brain structures that I am not interested in analyzing (specially the neighboring sulci).
I know that registration works with my data in general, since other regions (manually drawn on fsaverage, i.e. various pre-motor areas) are correctly registered.
is there any bias or "reduced" accuracy when registering regions of interest located at the parietal cortex?
I am aware that aparc2009 comprises an area called "S_inrapriet_and_P_trans", but I've found that this label is not restricted to the sulcus (in individual segmentations).
Any help would be appreciated! _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
I don't have anything to do this.
On 4/30/16 10:26 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
not that I know of, but Doug might have something. I would do it in matlab I guess
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016, Bastian Cheng wrote:
Hi Bruce!
sounds good, thank you!
is there a specific command to do that? I would guess that I would have to mask the sulc image with my label (S-intrapariet_and_P_trans)
Bastian
On 29 April 2016 at 14:46, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Bastien
maybe it would be easier and more accurate to extract the S_inrapriet_and_P_trans then use sulc to remove any vertices that are < 0 (that is, are not sulcal)?
cheers Bruce
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Bastian Cheng wrote:
Dear all,
I am creating a hand-drawn label of the Intraparietal sulcus on fsaverge.
When I register it to an individual brain (mri_label2label), the area is incorrectly registered and comprises adjacent brain structures that I am not interested in analyzing (specially the neighboring sulci).
I know that registration works with my data in general, since other regions (manually drawn on fsaverage, i.e. various pre-motor areas) are correctly registered.
is there any bias or "reduced" accuracy when registering regions of interest located at the parietal cortex?
I am aware that aparc2009 comprises an area called "S_inrapriet_and_P_trans", but I've found that this label is not restricted to the sulcus (in individual segmentations).
Any help would be appreciated! _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
too sad!
Thank you anyway - I'll try my luck with matlab.
Bastian.
On 30 April 2016 at 17:43, Douglas Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
I don't have anything to do this.
On 4/30/16 10:26 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
not that I know of, but Doug might have something. I would do it in matlab I guess
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016, Bastian Cheng wrote:
Hi Bruce!
sounds good, thank you!
is there a specific command to do that? I would guess that I would have to mask the sulc image with my label (S-intrapariet_and_P_trans)
Bastian
On 29 April 2016 at 14:46, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Bastien
maybe it would be easier and more accurate to extract the S_inrapriet_and_P_trans then use sulc to remove any vertices that are < 0 (that is, are not sulcal)?
cheers Bruce
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Bastian Cheng wrote:
Dear all,
I am creating a hand-drawn label of the Intraparietal sulcus on fsaverge.
When I register it to an individual brain (mri_label2label), the area is incorrectly registered and comprises adjacent brain structures that I am not interested in analyzing (specially the neighboring sulci).
I know that registration works with my data in general, since other regions (manually drawn on fsaverage, i.e. various pre-motor areas) are correctly registered.
is there any bias or "reduced" accuracy when registering regions of interest located at the parietal cortex?
I am aware that aparc2009 comprises an area called "S_inrapriet_and_P_trans", but I've found that this label is not restricted to the sulcus (in individual segmentations).
Any help would be appreciated! _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Bastian Cheng -
Bruce Fischl -
Douglas Greve