Hi All,
I was running freesurfer for a patient case of two time points. Will you suggest to run it as a group, such as one time point as a template and followed by longitudinal study, discussing atrophy or run these two time points separately as two individual, running everything such recon-all, dt-recon twice and comparing the result, such as thickness, volume and FA? BTW, I post a question about FA display before: will anything lead to a rectangular FA display, with extra diffusion out of the brain skull (no errors during recon and dt …)?
Best, Qi
Hi Qi,
you should process both time points together via the freesurfer longitudinal stream. Independent processing is less sensitive. Selecting one of the time points as a template is also bad, as it induces processing bias, see:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalProcessing and the References there.
I cannot answer the other question about FA.
Best, Martin
On 05/05/2016 06:52 PM, Zeng, Qi wrote:
Hi All,
I was running freesurfer for a patient case of two time points. Will you suggest to run it as a group, such as one time point as a template and followed by longitudinal study, discussing atrophy or run these two time points separately as two individual, running everything such recon-all, dt-recon twice and comparing the result, such as thickness, volume and FA? BTW, I post a question about FA display before: will anything lead to a rectangular FA display, with extra diffusion out of the brain skull (no errors during recon and dt …)?
Best, Qi
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu