Are you running this on your own subject or the tutorial subject?
Please include the freesurfer list on all emails with tracula questions.
Thanks, a.y
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Gerit Pfuhl wrote:
Dear Anastasia,
I got some improvement by setting nctps to 7 (as I had done last week with version 5.1.0). Now, we installed freesurfer 5.2.0 and I rerun one subject (changed drmirc file) but I got the following message: niiRead(): error opening file /fastfs/igis/MRI_fs_rec_dti/diffusion_tutorial/Diff001/dlabel/mni/lh.cst_AS_roi1.bbr.nii.gz ERROR: Could not read /fastfs/igis/MRI_fs_rec_dti/diffusion_tutorial/Diff001/dlabel/mni/lh.cst_AS_roi1.bbr.nii.gz
diffusion_tutorial/Diff001/dlabel/mni/lh.cst_AS_roi1.bbr.nii.gz does not exist, so that must be a new data set.??? Though I saw that the diffusion_tutorial page is from Sep 2012.
Regards Gerit
On 5 April 2013 18:23, Gerit Pfuhl gerit.pfuhl@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anastasia,
I will know more on monday, Then should also be able to upload files.
Bests Gerit
On 5 April 2013 17:37, Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Gerit - If it's not an issue with the gradient table but instead a tractography initialization issue, I strongly recommend running 5.2 with bbregister for the registration (which is the default in 5.2 anyway). You can also upload an example data set with issues (include: dmri, dmri.bedpostX, dlabel, dpath, scripts) here for me to take a look: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/ Hope this helps, a.y On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Gerit Pfuhl wrote: Dear Anastasia, thanks for the help. There is also a line option in freeview. However we still have brains with missing tracks, I rerun them with increasing the ncpts and registering to bbr (since that is default in Tracula 5.2.). We are reasonable confident that our bvel and bvac are correct, since we have roughly 20 cases out of 90 processed brains where there are no missing tracts. Further sometimes only one tract is missing, sometimes it is more severe. We could not find any correlation with recon-all problems or DTI raw data issues (all but one were without moving artefacts). Since we are running bedpostx outside of trac-all (i.e. trac-prep then bedpostx then trac-path) might it be an issue that is solved with installing the 5.2. version? Would that run in freesurfer 5.1.0? I guess we need to change the dcmrirc files only a bit. Kind regards Gerit Pfuhl On 3 April 2013 16:59, Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Benjamin - I'd look in a coronal view to see if the lines in the corpus callosum follow the curvature of the corpus callosum, and in a sagittal view to see if the lines in the cingulum follow the curvature of the cingulum. Does this make sense? a.y On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Roschinski, Benjamin wrote: Dear Anastasia, we dislpayed dtifit_V1 as lines, overlaid on dtifit_FA because our gradient table is wrong but I am not really sure how to analyse these informations. You wrote to Stefano the lines have to point in the right direction and that the eigenvectors are not pointing along his corpus callosum. Can you give me a more detailed description what I have to do when I dislpay dtifit_V1 as lines, overlaid on dtifit_FA. Thanks and kind regards Benjamin _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. -- http://gerit-orientation.blogspot.com http://team-arzgebirg.blogspot.com-- http://gerit-orientation.blogspot.com http://team-arzgebirg.blogspot.com
-- http://gerit-orientation.blogspot.com http://team-arzgebirg.blogspot.com
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu