Hi,

I have never tested compatibility with 5.1 and would recommend against it (5.1 was released almost 9 years ago). You can try it out on one subject and check results. There would be no support for this however.

Best, Martin

On 17. Dec 2019, at 20:34, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. DGREVE@mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

I think it should be ok in principle, though it might fail because the v6 long stream expects there to be certain files with certain names, and they might not be there with 5.1.

On 12/16/2019 2:49 PM, Morgan Botdorf wrote:

...

    External Email - Use Caution        

Dear Freesurfer Experts,

We have child data that was previously processed cross-sectionally using version 5.1. We are now interested in looking at the data longitudinally. Can the longitudinal processing stream in version 6.0 be used on data that was processed cross-sectionally using 5.1? Or is it better that we reprocess the data using 6.0. We appreciate any help you can provide!

Thank you,

Morgan Botdorf, M.S. Doctoral Candidate Neurocognitive Development Lab University of Maryland, College Park mbotdorf@terpmail.umd.edu mailto:mbotdorf@terpmail.umd.edu Office: 301.405.5922 tel:301.405.5922

---

Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

---

Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer