Hi,
following these refs I've found on the list and the mri_glmfit help, I assume the cluster-wise probability of the permutation simulation is based on cluster mass inference, is that right?
Thanks, Georg
Statistical Science 2004, Vol. 19, No. 4, 676-685 Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2004 Permutation Methods: A Basis for Exact Inference Michael D. Ernst
Human Brain Mapping 15:1-25(2001) Nonparametric Permutation Tests For Functional Neuroimaging: A Primer with Examples Thomas E. Nichols and Andrew P. Holmes
Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods Satoru Hayasaka and Thomas E. Nichols, NI, 20 (2003) 2343-2356.
Hagler and Sereno, NI, 2006, vol 33 1093-1103. Smoothing and cluster thresholding for cortical surface-based group analysis of fMRI data
yes, that is right.
doug
Georg Homola wrote:
Hi,
following these refs I've found on the list and the mri_glmfit help, I assume the cluster-wise probability of the permutation simulation is based on cluster mass inference, is that right?
Thanks, Georg
Statistical Science 2004, Vol. 19, No. 4, 676-685 Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2004 Permutation Methods: A Basis for Exact Inference Michael D. Ernst
Human Brain Mapping 15:1-25(2001) Nonparametric Permutation Tests For Functional Neuroimaging: A Primer with Examples Thomas E. Nichols and Andrew P. Holmes
Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods Satoru Hayasaka and Thomas E. Nichols, NI, 20 (2003) 2343-2356.
Hagler and Sereno, NI, 2006, vol 33 1093-1103. Smoothing and cluster thresholding for cortical surface-based group analysis of fMRI data
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu