Hi, just wondering if you have a guesstimate on the ETA of the new atlas ?

thanks

On 03/03/14, Juan Eugenio Iglesias wrote:

Dear Gabor, the segmentation benefits to some extent from higher resolution data, but produces decent estimates of the subfields at 1x1x1. We are working on a new atlas that will incorporate much more detail, and will more effectively take advantage of high-resolution images. Kind regards, Juan Eugenio Iglesias

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 13:49 +0100, Gabor Perlaki wrote:

...

Dear all,

1. Which is the suggested resolution for hippocampal subfields

segmentation with freesurfer? I've seen articles with 0.5*0.5*0.5mm^3 and with 1.0*1.0*1.0mm^3 as well. Does the hippocampal subfields segmentation really work with 1.0*1.0*1.0 resolution? 2. The article "Automated Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields from Ultra-High Resolution In Vivo MRI." suggested on Freesurfer's page uses FOV=448. We are unable to set up the matrix to achieve 0.38mm resolution using this FOV. Is there any other suggested article to set up our measurements?

Thanks,

-- Gabor Perlaki

---

Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

---

Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.