Dear Sneha, We use cortical and white matter parcels in the hippocampal subfields, which is more reliable than using the whole white / gray matter to compute parameters. But it could be hacked, albeit it would be a bit less reliable. I’ll add this to the wishlist / to-do list (unfortunately it isn’t likely I’ll be able to look at it any time soon…) Cheers, /Eugenio
Juan Eugenio Iglesias Senior research fellow CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT) http://www.jeiglesias.com
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Sneha Pandya snp2003@med.cornell.edu Reply-To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 10:46 To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] samseg with subfields
External Email - Use Caution Dear experts,
I want to revisit if anyone has ran subfield analysis just by running samseg? If it is possible is it as reliable as from running regular routine with “-all” recon-all flag?
Thank you,
Sneha
From: Sneha Pandya Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 4:15 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: samseg with subfields
Dear experts,
Is it possible to run subfield analysis (hippcampal subfields, amygdalar, thalamic nuclei, and brainstem structures) when we only run samseg on our dataset?
Thank you, Sneha
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Eugenio,
Thank you for quick response. That will be great if we could achieve it with whole-head segmentation too, considering its shorter run time, but can understand that it could be less reliable. If implemented, is it something that will be included as a patch to current release or will it part of next big release?
Thank you, Sneha
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E. Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:14 AM To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Freesurfer] samseg with subfields
Dear Sneha, We use cortical and white matter parcels in the hippocampal subfields, which is more reliable than using the whole white / gray matter to compute parameters. But it could be hacked, albeit it would be a bit less reliable. I’ll add this to the wishlist / to-do list (unfortunately it isn’t likely I’ll be able to look at it any time soon…) Cheers, /Eugenio
Juan Eugenio Iglesias Senior research fellow CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT) http://www.jeiglesias.comhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.jeiglesias.com&d=DwMGaQ&c=lb62iw4YL4RFalcE2hQUQealT9-RXrryqt9KZX2qu2s&r=AEsux002jQ5JzIPYIcsXKAuQmrt-1dubP8ZVldIiOrE&m=nvkbJLwGOMiMASjTHtMkLyhmC8Acu6t2DmhnDK56BfY&s=Jzs0r2z0IWEF_kMnRWpLOUDfJdqkszjHdQCQKVvAnfs&e=
From: <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Sneha Pandya <snp2003@med.cornell.edumailto:snp2003@med.cornell.edu> Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 10:46 To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] samseg with subfields
External Email - Use Caution Dear experts,
I want to revisit if anyone has ran subfield analysis just by running samseg? If it is possible is it as reliable as from running regular routine with “-all” recon-all flag?
Thank you,
Sneha
From: Sneha Pandya Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 4:15 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: samseg with subfields
Dear experts,
Is it possible to run subfield analysis (hippcampal subfields, amygdalar, thalamic nuclei, and brainstem structures) when we only run samseg on our dataset?
Thank you, Sneha
sorry, did not see this before I responded. Ignore what I said
On 5/5/2020 11:13 AM, Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E. wrote:
Dear Sneha,
We use cortical and white matter parcels in the hippocampal subfields, which is more reliable than using the whole white / gray matter to compute parameters. But it could be hacked, albeit it would be a bit less reliable. I’ll add this to the wishlist / to-do list (unfortunately it isn’t likely I’ll be able to look at it any time soon…)
Cheers,
/Eugenio
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
*From: *freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Sneha Pandya snp2003@med.cornell.edu *Reply-To: *Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Date: *Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 10:46 *To: *"freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] samseg with subfields
* External Email - Use Caution *
Dear experts,
I want to revisit if anyone has ran subfield analysis just by running samseg? If it is possible is it as reliable as from running regular routine with “-all” recon-all flag?
Thank you,
Sneha
*From:* Sneha Pandya *Sent:* Thursday, April 30, 2020 4:15 PM *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject:* samseg with subfields
Dear experts,
Is it possible to run subfield analysis (hippcampal subfields, amygdalar, thalamic nuclei, and brainstem structures) when we only run samseg on our dataset?
Thank you,
Sneha
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Dough,
No worries, this was helpful too. Probably, I will test it on a subset of subjects and compare the two for possible discrepancies.
Thank you, Sneha
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Douglas N. Greve Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:39 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Freesurfer] samseg with subfields
sorry, did not see this before I responded. Ignore what I said On 5/5/2020 11:13 AM, Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E. wrote: Dear Sneha, We use cortical and white matter parcels in the hippocampal subfields, which is more reliable than using the whole white / gray matter to compute parameters. But it could be hacked, albeit it would be a bit less reliable. I’ll add this to the wishlist / to-do list (unfortunately it isn’t likely I’ll be able to look at it any time soon…) Cheers, /Eugenio
Juan Eugenio Iglesias Senior research fellow CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT) http://www.jeiglesias.comhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.jeiglesias.com&d=DwMDaQ&c=lb62iw4YL4RFalcE2hQUQealT9-RXrryqt9KZX2qu2s&r=AEsux002jQ5JzIPYIcsXKAuQmrt-1dubP8ZVldIiOrE&m=B8aRiWly3gmmmg0vnY6wn5kmlR0tHteUEB2hOkzaoCE&s=3enydUNbkb3fHf4FjYUaK6STd9w98j288fmleKlGijs&e=
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Sneha Pandya snp2003@med.cornell.edumailto:snp2003@med.cornell.edu Reply-To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 10:46 To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] samseg with subfields
External Email - Use Caution Dear experts,
I want to revisit if anyone has ran subfield analysis just by running samseg? If it is possible is it as reliable as from running regular routine with “-all” recon-all flag?
Thank you,
Sneha
From: Sneha Pandya Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 4:15 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: samseg with subfields
Dear experts,
Is it possible to run subfield analysis (hippcampal subfields, amygdalar, thalamic nuclei, and brainstem structures) when we only run samseg on our dataset?
Thank you, Sneha
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurferhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu_mailman_listinfo_freesurfer&d=DwMDaQ&c=lb62iw4YL4RFalcE2hQUQealT9-RXrryqt9KZX2qu2s&r=AEsux002jQ5JzIPYIcsXKAuQmrt-1dubP8ZVldIiOrE&m=B8aRiWly3gmmmg0vnY6wn5kmlR0tHteUEB2hOkzaoCE&s=_5jkic5DEr2z1of7Gj4w-MCc3lQ0bQW4pV2PmbOSe3w&e=
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu