Dear All, I wonder if you have experienced or there is any report on cortical segmentation reliability in the mid-line structures of the brain, so one should take them into consideration in running group differences with Qdec?
Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri
Hi Amirhossein
which structures do you mean? Like the ventricles? We usually mask those regions out using the ?h.cortex.label. The surfaces should be "frozen" in those regions in any case, meaning that the white and pial are in the same location (and the thickness is 0)
cheers Bruce
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, amirhossein manzouri wrote:
Dear All, I wonder if you have experienced or there is any report on cortical segmentation reliability in the mid-line structures of the brain, so one should take them into consideration in running group differences with Qdec?
Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri
Dear Bruce, I meant cingulate cortex, the cuneus and precuneus !
Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Amirhossein
which structures do you mean? Like the ventricles? We usually mask those regions out using the ?h.cortex.label. The surfaces should be "frozen" in those regions in any case, meaning that the white and pial are in the same location (and the thickness is 0)
cheers Bruce
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, amirhossein manzouri wrote:
Dear All,
I wonder if you have experienced or there is any report on cortical segmentation reliability in the mid-line structures of the brain, so one should take them into consideration in running group differences with Qdec?
Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
oh, I see. Usually it's pretty good there. Sometimes if there is enough motion, or lower res scans it can be hard to distinguish left from right gray matter, but otherwise it is a pretty reliable set of regions I believe
cheers Bruce
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, amirhossein manzouri wrote:
Dear Bruce, I meant cingulate cortex, the cuneus and precuneus !
Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Amirhossein
which structures do you mean? Like the ventricles? We usually mask those regions out using the ?h.cortex.label. The surfaces should be "frozen" in those regions in any case, meaning that the white and pial are in the same location (and the thickness is 0) cheers Bruce On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, amirhossein manzouri wrote: Dear All, I wonder if you have experienced or there is any report on cortical segmentation reliability in the mid-line structures of the brain, so one should take them into consideration in running group differences with Qdec? Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu