Hi all,
Can anyone provide information regarding how v1.thresh.label and v2.thresh.label that are automatically implemented in FreeSurfer are thresholded?
Thanks! Krista
Hi Krista, I believe the v?.thresh labels are thresholded at p=0.8. This threshold is based on comparisons of actual and predicted V1 boundary with an independent dataset.
Relevant pub: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ftp/articles/hinds2008accurate.pdf
-Louis
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, krista kelly wrote:
Hi all, Can anyone provide information regarding how v1.thresh.label and v2.thresh.label that are automatically implemented in FreeSurfer are thresholded?
Thanks! Krista
Thanks so much Louis! This was exactly what I was looking for. The Hinds et al. (2009) paper also has this info.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Louis Nicholas Vinke < vinke@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Krista, I believe the v?.thresh labels are thresholded at p=0.8. This threshold is based on comparisons of actual and predicted V1 boundary with an independent dataset.
Relevant pub: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ftp/articles/ hinds2008accurate.pdf
-Louis
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, krista kelly wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone provide information regarding how v1.thresh.label and v2.thresh.label that are automatically implemented in FreeSurfer are thresholded?
Thanks! Krista
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu