Hi,
Given the recent debate on the accuracy of the eICV in FS, I am wondering what to cite when using these measures. Do you prefer
Whole Brain Segmentation: Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain, Fischl, B., D.H. Salat, E. Busa, M. Albert, M. Dieterich, C. Haselgrove, A. van der Kouwe, R. Killiany, D. Kennedy, S. Klaveness, A. Montillo, N. Makris, B. Rosen, and A.M. Dale, (2002). Neuron, 33:341-355.
or is there a better choice?
------------------------------------ Here miracles become marvels, and marvels recurring wonders. -- William Beebe
Dr. Glenn Lawyer +352 661 967 244 Instituttgruppe for psykiatri Seksjon Vinderen PB 85 Vinderen 0319 Oslo http://folk.uio.no/davidgl
Hi Glenn,
that's the right paper to cite for the registration methods, but the idea of using this for ICV was Randy Buckner's (I think the reference is on our wiki).
cheers, Bruce
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 d.g.lawyer@medisin.uio.no wrote:
Hi,
Given the recent debate on the accuracy of the eICV in FS, I am wondering what to cite when using these measures. Do you prefer
Whole Brain Segmentation: Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain, Fischl, B., D.H. Salat, E. Busa, M. Albert, M. Dieterich, C. Haselgrove, A. van der Kouwe, R. Killiany, D. Kennedy, S. Klaveness, A. Montillo, N. Makris, B. Rosen, and A.M. Dale, (2002). Neuron, 33:341-355.
or is there a better choice?
Here miracles become marvels, and marvels recurring wonders. -- William Beebe
Dr. Glenn Lawyer +352 661 967 244 Instituttgruppe for psykiatri Seksjon Vinderen PB 85 Vinderen 0319 Oslo http://folk.uio.no/davidgl
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Greetings, We are using fsaverage as the template for overlaying our group fMRI data. Which annotation file should we use for designating ROIs? There seem to be two options: lh.aparc.a2005s.annot and lh.aparc.annot. And which atlas is each annotation file derived from? Thank you, Dara
Dara S. Manoach, Ph.D. Psychiatric Neuroimaging Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown Navy Yard 149 13th Street, Room 2608 Charlestown, MA 02129 email: dara@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu phone: 617-724-6148 fax: 617-726-4078
aparc.annot is Rahul Desikan, et al's, and a2005s is Christophe Destriux's. Both were derived from a group of brains labeled by hand. They are fairly different in the detail (Christophe's is very detailed). You can use either one.
Dara Manoach wrote:
Greetings, We are using fsaverage as the template for overlaying our group fMRI data. Which annotation file should we use for designating ROIs? There seem to be two options: lh.aparc.a2005s.annot and lh.aparc.annot. And which atlas is each annotation file derived from? Thank you, Dara
Dara S. Manoach, Ph.D. Psychiatric Neuroimaging Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown Navy Yard 149 13th Street, Room 2608 Charlestown, MA 02129 email: dara@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:dara@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu phone: 617-724-6148 fax: 617-726-4078
http://nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/manoachlab
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Bruce Fischl -
d.g.lawyer＠medisin.uio.no -
Dara Manoach -
Doug Greve