Dear Freesurfers,
We noticed that some subjects in our study have the average cortical thickness values in entorhinal and temporal pole above 4 mm. They are adolescent girls so they're pretty young but we wonder if these values are accurate. Visually, their segmentations seem good.
In an older email, Bruce was recommending using _exvivo.stats instead of aparc for entorhinal measurements: https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg26364.html
Is there a similar recommendation for the temporal pole? There doesn't seem to be any stats files apart from aparc concerning this region.
Thanks! Mihaela
Hi Mihaela
adolescent girls probably have thicker cortex than older kids/adults. One thing to watch our for is dura/tentorium. Particularly when the cortex is thick it can be adjacent to cortical gray matter and difficult/impossible to avoid including in the cortical ribbon unless you have something in addition to a T1 (FLAIR, T2SPACE, T2*)
cheers Bruce
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
Dear Freesurfers, We noticed that some subjects in our study have the average cortical thickness values in entorhinal and temporal pole above 4 mm. They are adolescent girls so they're pretty young but we wonder if these values are accurate. Visually, their segmentations seem good.
In an older email, Bruce was recommending using _exvivo.stats instead of aparc for entorhinal measurements: https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg26364.html
Is there a similar recommendation for the temporal pole? There doesn't seem to be any stats files apart from aparc concerning this region.
Thanks! Mihaela
Thanks, Bruce! Unfortunately, we don't have additional sequences for this data set but it's good to know that we have the best segmentation possible. :)
Best, Mihaela
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Mihaela
adolescent girls probably have thicker cortex than older kids/adults. One thing to watch our for is dura/tentorium. Particularly when the cortex is thick it can be adjacent to cortical gray matter and difficult/impossible to avoid including in the cortical ribbon unless you have something in addition to a T1 (FLAIR, T2SPACE, T2*)
cheers Bruce
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
Dear Freesurfers,
We noticed that some subjects in our study have the average cortical thickness values in entorhinal and temporal pole above 4 mm. They are adolescent girls so they're pretty young but we wonder if these values are accurate. Visually, their segmentations seem good.
In an older email, Bruce was recommending using _exvivo.stats instead of aparc for entorhinal measurements: https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg26364.html
Is there a similar recommendation for the temporal pole? There doesn't seem to be any stats files apart from aparc concerning this region.
Thanks! Mihaela
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu