Hi Freesurfer experts,
I first parcellated the ?h.aparc.annot using the mris_divide_parcellation and at first glance it seems fine. However, I experienced that the size of the regions varies a lot. I then found the mris_make_face_parcellation, that parcellate the surface in regions of more equal sizes. Unfortunately the mris_make_face_parcallation uses the whole surface including the medial wall. Is there any way I can get rid of the labels covering the medial wall and obtain a parcellation with the same number of vertices as ?h.apac.annot, but with regions of equal size?
Best, Karen
Hi Karen
sorry, I don't think so. You could certainly discard parcels that have a substantial non-cortical component to them, but parcellating the remainder of the surface uniformly isn't trivial.
cheers Bruce On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Karen Marie Sandø Ambrosen wrote:
Hi Freesurfer experts,
I first parcellated the ?h.aparc.annot using the mris_divide_parcellation and at first glance it seems fine. However, I experienced that the size of the regions varies a lot. I then found the mris_make_face_parcellation, that parcellate the surface in regions of more equal sizes. Unfortunately the mris_make_face_parcallation uses the whole surface including the medial wall. Is there any way I can get rid of the labels covering the medial wall and obtain a parcellation with the same number of vertices as ?h.apac.annot, but with regions of equal size?
Best, Karen _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi Bruce,
How can I remove the non-cortical parcels from the annotation file created by mris_make_face_parcellation, such that I obtain an annotation file with approx. the same number of parcels as ?h.aparc.annot.
Best, Karen
On 04/01/2014 02:05 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Karen
sorry, I don't think so. You could certainly discard parcels that have a substantial non-cortical component to them, but parcellating the remainder of the surface uniformly isn't trivial.
cheers Bruce On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Karen Marie Sandø Ambrosen wrote:
Hi Freesurfer experts,
I first parcellated the ?h.aparc.annot using the mris_divide_parcellation and at first glance it seems fine. However, I experienced that the size of the regions varies a lot. I then found the mris_make_face_parcellation, that parcellate the surface in regions of more equal sizes. Unfortunately the mris_make_face_parcallation uses the whole surface including the medial wall. Is there any way I can get rid of the labels covering the medial wall and obtain a parcellation with the same number of vertices as ?h.apac.annot, but with regions of equal size?
Best, Karen _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Karen
I guess I would do it in matlab - load the face parcellation and the aparc.annot, then count the number of vertices in each parcel in the face parcellation that is in a non-cortical aparc.annot parcel, and set a threshold for discarding them.
cheers Bruce
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Karen Marie Sandø Ambrosen wrote:
Hi Bruce,
How can I remove the non-cortical parcels from the annotation file created by mris_make_face_parcellation, such that I obtain an annotation file with approx. the same number of parcels as ?h.aparc.annot.
Best, Karen
On 04/01/2014 02:05 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: Hi Karen
sorry, I don't think so. You could certainly discard parcels that have a substantial non-cortical component to them, but parcellating the remainder of the surface uniformly isn't trivial. cheers Bruce On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Karen Marie Sandø Ambrosen wrote: Hi Freesurfer experts, I first parcellated the ?h.aparc.annot using the mris_divide_parcellation and at first glance it seems fine. However, I experienced that the size of the regions varies a lot. I then found the mris_make_face_parcellation, that parcellate the surface in regions of more equal sizes. Unfortunately the mris_make_face_parcallation uses the whole surface including the medial wall. Is there any way I can get rid of the labels covering the medial wall and obtain a parcellation with the same number of vertices as ?h.apac.annot, but with regions of equal size? Best, Karen _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mai l contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLin e at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in er ror but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and prop erly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu