Dear all,
What does this mean? That tracula is more robust when running it seperately for the tracts I am interested in? Thanks, Barbara
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Michele Cavallari < cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote:
errata corrige: it did work! I had to re-run the whole thing including only that specific tract...and eventually it worked.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michele Cavallari < cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote:
Tried...unfortunately it didn't improve
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Chris Watson < Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
You can try just re-running "trac-prep -prior" and "trac-paths" for the L uncinate and no other tracts
On 09/11/2014 02:58 PM, Michele Cavallari wrote:
So, I re-ran the case with the set reinit option. It "half" worked!...in the sense that the new results show the left uncinate right, but the right-side one is still a dot (see screenshot of the brain view from the bottom). Any further suggestion? Thanks.
[image: Inline image 2]
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Michele Cavallari < cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks! it's running...
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Barbara Kreilkamp < bakk.hbg@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi Michele,
Don't think there is anything wrong with the attached dmrirc.tutorial file. You definitely need to add the '-c' flag infront of the path to your configuration file. Right now it reads the path to your file as a flag, which is of course not what you want.
Best, Barbara
On 11/09/2014 17:49, Michele Cavallari wrote:
Hi Anastasia, I am probably doing something wrong with the syntax of the dmrirc file. I get this error message
trac-all -prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
ERROR: flag /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial unrecognized
-prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
Could you please check the attached file?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Anastasia Yendiki < ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Thanks, Michele. Hard to tell what's causing this, perhaps a bit of distortion orbitofrontally. You may be able to fix this type of thing by reinitializing the tract reconstruction: Add "set reinit = 1" to your configuration file, set the pathlist to include only the left and right uncinate, and then rerun the -prior and -path steps of trac-all on this subject.
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote:
uploaded (and activated).Thanks! > > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Anastasia Yendiki < > ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > > Hi Michele - The anatomical segmentation does look good, but > from the > screenshot the DWI data seems to be noisy in the orbitofrontal > area, which > may be affecting the uncinate. It's hard to tell just from one > slice. > > If you upload all the tracula output directories of this > subject (dmri, > dmri.bedpostX, dlabel, dpath) for me here, I'll take a look: > https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/ > > Thanks! > a.y > > On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: > > Hi Anastasia,I completed the tracula processing. > By looking at the tractography results in the viewer I > noticed > that the uncinate > fasciculus is pretty small (see attached screenshot). It > actually appears as a small > blue dot. And the problem is both on the left and right > side. > The other tracts look > fine. I played with threshold, but the size didn't > increase. So, > I guess that something > wrong happened with the tractography of that particular > bundle. > I checked the aparc+aseg > output (attached): it seems right to me, but could you > please > double-check? > Let me also know if you have any suggestions, and if you > need > more information or output > files. > Best, > Michele > > Inline image 1 > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Anastasia Yendiki > ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: > > Hi Ludy - If your gradient table is formatted in 3 > rows > you need to > either: > > 1. Convert it to 3 columns so you can use it with > the 5.3 > version of > tracula, which requires the gradient table to be > formatted > in columns > > OR > > 2. Download the tracula update that can use > gradient > tables formatted in > rows > > Hope this helps, > a.y > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, lshih@bidmc.harvard.edu wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I was having similar errors as Michele Cavallari > regarding "error reading > /path/to/subject/dmri/dwi_frame," but I'm not sure > it's > related to my bvecs > file. I did try reconfiguring my bvecs file into > columns > instead of row just > in case, but that didn't solve the problem. It > really just > looks like it > can't find the dwi_frame file after the mri_concat > command. > > > > I am attaching my trac-all.log and config file. > > > > Running Freesurfer 5.3 on Macbook OS 10.7.5. The > bvecs > files were > generated after I converted my dicoms to nifti > using > dcm2niigui (GE > scanner). > > > > Can anyone tell me how dwi_frame is generated? > > > > > > Ludy > > > > This message is intended for the use of the > person(s) to > whom it may be > addressed. It may contain information that is > privileged, > confidential, or > otherwise protected from disclosure under > applicable law. > If you are not the > intended recipient, any dissemination, > distribution, > copying, or use of this > information is prohibited. If you have received > this > message in error, > please permanently delete it and immediately > notify the > sender. Thank you. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the > person > to whom it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in > error > and the e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners > Compliance HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail > was sent > to you in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact > the > sender and properly > dispose of the e-mail. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to > whom it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and > the e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to > you in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender > and properly > dispose of the e-mail. > > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine athttp://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine athttp://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
I don't think that would change the results (significantly), so you would just be wasting processing time. It depends on the quality of your data. In this thread, as Anastasia said earlier, there is distortion around the L orbitofrontal cortex, which may have caused the problem Michele was having (reconstructing the L uncinate).
But if you're *only* interested in a subset of the available tracts, you should probably comment out the others, if you want to save time.
On 09/16/2014 07:18 AM, Barbara Kreilkamp wrote:
Dear all,
What does this mean? That tracula is more robust when running it seperately for the tracts I am interested in? Thanks, Barbara
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Michele Cavallari <cavallari.michele@gmail.com mailto:cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote:
errata corrige: it did work! I had to re-run the whole thing including only that specific tract...and eventually it worked. On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michele Cavallari <cavallari.michele@gmail.com <mailto:cavallari.michele@gmail.com>> wrote: Tried...unfortunately it didn't improve On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Chris Watson <Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu <mailto:Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu>> wrote: You can try just re-running "trac-prep -prior" and "trac-paths" for the L uncinate and no other tracts On 09/11/2014 02:58 PM, Michele Cavallari wrote:So, I re-ran the case with the set reinit option. It "half" worked!...in the sense that the new results show the left uncinate right, but the right-side one is still a dot (see screenshot of the brain view from the bottom). Any further suggestion? Thanks. Inline image 2 On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Michele Cavallari <cavallari.michele@gmail.com <mailto:cavallari.michele@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks! it's running... On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Barbara Kreilkamp <bakk.hbg@googlemail.com <mailto:bakk.hbg@googlemail.com>> wrote: Hi Michele, Don't think there is anything wrong with the attached dmrirc.tutorial file. You definitely need to add the '-c' flag infront of the path to your configuration file. Right now it reads the path to your file as a flag, which is of course not what you want. Best, Barbara On 11/09/2014 17:49, Michele Cavallari wrote:Hi Anastasia, I am probably doing something wrong with the syntax of the dmrirc file. I get this error message trac-all -prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial ERROR: flag /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial unrecognized -prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial Could you please check the attached file? On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote: Thanks, Michele. Hard to tell what's causing this, perhaps a bit of distortion orbitofrontally. You may be able to fix this type of thing by reinitializing the tract reconstruction: Add "set reinit = 1" to your configuration file, set the pathlist to include only the left and right uncinate, and then rerun the -prior and -path steps of trac-all on this subject. On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: uploaded (and activated).Thanks! On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote: Hi Michele - The anatomical segmentation does look good, but from the screenshot the DWI data seems to be noisy in the orbitofrontal area, which may be affecting the uncinate. It's hard to tell just from one slice. If you upload all the tracula output directories of this subject (dmri, dmri.bedpostX, dlabel, dpath) for me here, I'll take a look: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/ Thanks! a.y On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: Hi Anastasia,I completed the tracula processing. By looking at the tractography results in the viewer I noticed that the uncinate fasciculus is pretty small (see attached screenshot). It actually appears as a small blue dot. And the problem is both on the left and right side. The other tracts look fine. I played with threshold, but the size didn't increase. So, I guess that something wrong happened with the tractography of that particular bundle. I checked the aparc+aseg output (attached): it seems right to me, but could you please double-check? Let me also know if you have any suggestions, and if you need more information or output files. Best, Michele Inline image 1 On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote: Hi Ludy - If your gradient table is formatted in 3 rows you need to either: 1. Convert it to 3 columns so you can use it with the 5.3 version of tracula, which requires the gradient table to be formatted in columns OR 2. Download the tracula update that can use gradient tables formatted in rows Hope this helps, a.y On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, lshih@bidmc.harvard.edu <mailto:lshih@bidmc.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I was having similar errors as Michele Cavallari regarding "error reading /path/to/subject/dmri/dwi_frame," but I'm not sure it's related to my bvecs file. I did try reconfiguring my bvecs file into columns instead of row just in case, but that didn't solve the problem. It really just looks like it can't find the dwi_frame file after the mri_concat command. > > I am attaching my trac-all.log and config file. > > Running Freesurfer 5.3 on Macbook OS 10.7.5. The bvecs files were generated after I converted my dicoms to nifti using dcm2niigui (GE scanner). > > Can anyone tell me how dwi_frame is generated? > > > Ludy > > This message is intended for the use of the person(s) to whom it may be addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, copying, or use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please permanently delete it and immediately notify the sender. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail._______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail._______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi, I am having problems with tracula pre-processing for a case of a series I am analyzing. The processing worked without errors for two out of three cases I was running at the same time. I received a 'segmentation fault' error. I checked the FreeSurfer recon-all output, and it was completed without errors. I tried to re-process the case alone: got the very same outcome. I am enclosing the log file of the tracula processing of the case that's giving me an error. Let me know if you need more information/files. Thanks, -Michele
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Chris Watson < Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
I don't think that would change the results (significantly), so you would just be wasting processing time. It depends on the quality of your data. In this thread, as Anastasia said earlier, there is distortion around the L orbitofrontal cortex, which may have caused the problem Michele was having (reconstructing the L uncinate).
But if you're *only* interested in a subset of the available tracts, you should probably comment out the others, if you want to save time.
On 09/16/2014 07:18 AM, Barbara Kreilkamp wrote:
Dear all,
What does this mean? That tracula is more robust when running it seperately for the tracts I am interested in? Thanks, Barbara
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Michele Cavallari < cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote:
errata corrige: it did work! I had to re-run the whole thing including only that specific tract...and eventually it worked.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michele Cavallari < cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote:
Tried...unfortunately it didn't improve
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Chris Watson < Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
You can try just re-running "trac-prep -prior" and "trac-paths" for the L uncinate and no other tracts
On 09/11/2014 02:58 PM, Michele Cavallari wrote:
So, I re-ran the case with the set reinit option. It "half" worked!...in the sense that the new results show the left uncinate right, but the right-side one is still a dot (see screenshot of the brain view from the bottom). Any further suggestion? Thanks.
[image: Inline image 2]
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Michele Cavallari < cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks! it's running...
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Barbara Kreilkamp < bakk.hbg@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi Michele,
Don't think there is anything wrong with the attached dmrirc.tutorial file. You definitely need to add the '-c' flag infront of the path to your configuration file. Right now it reads the path to your file as a flag, which is of course not what you want.
Best, Barbara
On 11/09/2014 17:49, Michele Cavallari wrote:
Hi Anastasia, I am probably doing something wrong with the syntax of the dmrirc file. I get this error message
trac-all -prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
ERROR: flag /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial unrecognized
-prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
Could you please check the attached file?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Anastasia Yendiki < ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > Thanks, Michele. Hard to tell what's causing this, perhaps a bit of > distortion orbitofrontally. You may be able to fix this type of thing by > reinitializing the tract reconstruction: Add "set reinit = 1" to your > configuration file, set the pathlist to include only the left and right > uncinate, and then rerun the -prior and -path steps of trac-all on this > subject. > > On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: > > uploaded (and activated).Thanks! >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Anastasia Yendiki < >> ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: >> >> Hi Michele - The anatomical segmentation does look good, but >> from the >> screenshot the DWI data seems to be noisy in the >> orbitofrontal area, which >> may be affecting the uncinate. It's hard to tell just from >> one slice. >> >> If you upload all the tracula output directories of this >> subject (dmri, >> dmri.bedpostX, dlabel, dpath) for me here, I'll take a look: >> https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/ >> >> Thanks! >> a.y >> >> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: >> >> Hi Anastasia,I completed the tracula processing. >> By looking at the tractography results in the viewer I >> noticed >> that the uncinate >> fasciculus is pretty small (see attached screenshot). It >> actually appears as a small >> blue dot. And the problem is both on the left and right >> side. >> The other tracts look >> fine. I played with threshold, but the size didn't >> increase. So, >> I guess that something >> wrong happened with the tractography of that particular >> bundle. >> I checked the aparc+aseg >> output (attached): it seems right to me, but could you >> please >> double-check? >> Let me also know if you have any suggestions, and if >> you need >> more information or output >> files. >> Best, >> Michele >> >> Inline image 1 >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Anastasia Yendiki >> ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: >> >> Hi Ludy - If your gradient table is formatted in >> 3 rows >> you need to >> either: >> >> 1. Convert it to 3 columns so you can use it with >> the 5.3 >> version of >> tracula, which requires the gradient table to be >> formatted >> in columns >> >> OR >> >> 2. Download the tracula update that can use >> gradient >> tables formatted in >> rows >> >> Hope this helps, >> a.y >> >> On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, lshih@bidmc.harvard.edu >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I was having similar errors as Michele Cavallari >> regarding "error reading >> /path/to/subject/dmri/dwi_frame," but I'm not >> sure it's >> related to my bvecs >> file. I did try reconfiguring my bvecs file into >> columns >> instead of row just >> in case, but that didn't solve the problem. It >> really just >> looks like it >> can't find the dwi_frame file after the mri_concat >> command. >> > >> > I am attaching my trac-all.log and config file. >> > >> > Running Freesurfer 5.3 on Macbook OS 10.7.5. >> The bvecs >> files were >> generated after I converted my dicoms to nifti >> using >> dcm2niigui (GE >> scanner). >> > >> > Can anyone tell me how dwi_frame is generated? >> > >> > >> > Ludy >> > >> > This message is intended for the use of the >> person(s) to >> whom it may be >> addressed. It may contain information that is >> privileged, >> confidential, or >> otherwise protected from disclosure under >> applicable law. >> If you are not the >> intended recipient, any dissemination, >> distribution, >> copying, or use of this >> information is prohibited. If you have received >> this >> message in error, >> please permanently delete it and immediately >> notify the >> sender. Thank you. >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> >> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the >> person >> to whom it is >> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you >> in error >> and the e-mail >> contains patient information, please contact the >> Partners >> Compliance HelpLine at >> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail >> was sent >> to you in error >> but does not contain patient information, please >> contact the >> sender and properly >> dispose of the e-mail. >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> >> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to >> whom it is >> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and >> the e-mail >> contains patient information, please contact the Partners >> Compliance HelpLine at >> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to >> you in error >> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender >> and properly >> dispose of the e-mail. >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to > whom it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and > the e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to > you in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender > and properly > dispose of the e-mail. > >
Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine athttp://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine athttp://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine athttp://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Michele - It seems like it's failing in the right uncinate again. From the error, I would guess that part of that tract is getting left out of the brain mask or something of that sort. Can you please check how that area looks in the aparc+aseg and in the diffusion data?
a.y
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote:
Hi, I am having problems with tracula pre-processing for a case of a series I am analyzing. The processing worked without errors for two out of three cases I was running at the same time. I received a 'segmentation fault' error. I checked the FreeSurfer recon-all output, and it was completed without errors. I tried to re-process the case alone: got the very same outcome. I am enclosing the log file of the tracula processing of the case that's giving me an error. Let me know if you need more information/files. Thanks, -Michele
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Chris Watson Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu wrote: I don't think that would change the results (significantly), so you would just be wasting processing time. It depends on the quality of your data. In this thread, as Anastasia said earlier, there is distortion around the L orbitofrontal cortex, which may have caused the problem Michele was having (reconstructing the L uncinate).
But if you're *only* interested in a subset of the available tracts, you should probably comment out the others, if you want to save time. On 09/16/2014 07:18 AM, Barbara Kreilkamp wrote: Dear all, What does this mean? That tracula is more robust when running it seperately for the tracts I am interested in? Thanks, Barbara On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Michele Cavallari <cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote: errata corrige: it did work! I had to re-run the whole thing including only that specific tract...and eventually it worked.On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michele Cavallari cavallari.michele@gmail.com wrote: Tried...unfortunately it didn't improve
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Chris Watson Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu wrote: You can try just re-running "trac-prep -prior" and "trac-paths" for the L uncinate and no other tracts
On 09/11/2014 02:58 PM, Michele Cavallari wrote: So, I re-ran the case with the set reinit option. It "half" worked!...in the sense that the new results show the left uncinate right, but the right-side one is still a dot (see screenshot of the brain view from the bottom). Any further suggestion?Thanks.
Inline image 2
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Michele Cavallari cavallari.michele@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! it's running...
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Barbara Kreilkamp bakk.hbg@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Michele,
Don't think there is anything wrong with the attached dmrirc.tutorial file. You definitely need to add the '-c' flag infront of the path to your configuration file. Right now it reads the path to your file as a flag, which is of course not what you want. Best, Barbara On 11/09/2014 17:49, Michele Cavallari wrote: Hi Anastasia, I am probably doing something wrong with the syntax of the dmrirc file.I get this error message
trac-all -prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
ERROR: flag /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial unrecognized
-prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
Could you please check the attached file?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Thanks, Michele. Hard to tell what's causing this, perhaps a bit of distortion orbitofrontally. You may be able to fix this type of thing by reinitializing the tract reconstruction: Add "set reinit = 1" to your configuration file, set the pathlist to include only the left and right uncinate, and then rerun the -prior and -path steps of trac-all on this subject. On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: uploaded (and activated).Thanks! On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Michele - The anatomical segmentation does look good, but from the screenshot the DWI data seems to be noisy in the orbitofrontal area, which may be affecting the uncinate. It's hard to tell just from one slice. If you upload all the tracula output directories of this subject (dmri, dmri.bedpostX, dlabel, dpath) for me here, I'll take a look: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/ Thanks! a.y On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: Hi Anastasia,I completed the tracula processing. By looking at the tractography results in the viewer I noticed that the uncinate fasciculus is pretty small (see attached screenshot). It actually appears as a small blue dot. And the problem is both on the left and right side. The other tracts look fine. I played with threshold, but the size didn't increase. So, I guess that something wrong happened with the tractography of that particular bundle. I checked the aparc+aseg output (attached): it seems right to me, but could you please double-check? Let me also know if you have any suggestions, and if you need more information or output files. Best, Michele Inline image 1 On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Ludy - If your gradient table is formatted in 3 rows you need to either: 1. Convert it to 3 columns so you can use it with the 5.3 version of tracula, which requires the gradient table to be formatted in columns OR 2. Download the tracula update that can use gradient tables formatted in rows Hope this helps, a.y On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, lshih@bidmc.harvard.edu wrote: > Hi, > > I was having similar errors as Michele Cavallari regarding "error reading /path/to/subject/dmri/dwi_frame," but I'm not sure it's related to my bvecs file. I did try reconfiguring my bvecs file into columns instead of row just in case, but that didn't solve the problem. It really just looks like it can't find the dwi_frame file after the mri_concat command. > > I am attaching my trac-all.log and config file. > > Running Freesurfer 5.3 on Macbook OS 10.7.5. The bvecs files were generated after I converted my dicoms to nifti using dcm2niigui (GE scanner). > > Can anyone tell me how dwi_frame is generated? > > > Ludy > > This message is intended for the use of the person(s) to whom it may be addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, copying, or use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please permanently delete it and immediately notify the sender. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Anastasia, thanks for your feedback. I checked both te aparc+aseg and the diffusion images. There is some underestimation of left insula and left temporal pole in the mask, corresponding to quite large missing (0 value) areas in the FA maps.
I tried to re-run the -prep step using the "-prior" option and with no success: still getting a 'segmentation fault' error message (log and error files attached).
Is there anything else I can try to analyze this case without having to re-run the segmentation/parcellation? And are there ways to improve the parcellation in those regions?
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Anastasia Yendiki < ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Michele - It seems like it's failing in the right uncinate again. From the error, I would guess that part of that tract is getting left out of the brain mask or something of that sort. Can you please check how that area looks in the aparc+aseg and in the diffusion data?
a.y
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote:
Hi, I am having problems with tracula pre-processing for a case of a
series I am analyzing. The processing worked without errors for two out of three cases I was running at the same time. I received a 'segmentation fault' error. I checked the FreeSurfer recon-all output, and it was completed without errors. I tried to re-process the case alone: got the very same outcome. I am enclosing the log file of the tracula processing of the case that's giving me an error. Let me know if you need more information/files. Thanks, -Michele
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Chris Watson < Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: I don't think that would change the results (significantly), so you would just be wasting processing time. It depends on the quality of your data. In this thread, as Anastasia said earlier, there is distortion around the L orbitofrontal cortex, which may have caused the problem Michele was having (reconstructing the L uncinate).
But if you're *only* interested in a subset of the availabletracts, you should probably comment out the others, if you want to save time.
On 09/16/2014 07:18 AM, Barbara Kreilkamp wrote: Dear all, What does this mean? That tracula is more robust when running itseperately for the tracts I am interested in? Thanks, Barbara
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Michele Cavallari <cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote: errata corrige: it did work! I had to re-run the whole thing including only that specific tract...and eventually it worked.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michele Cavallari < cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote: Tried...unfortunately it didn't improve
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Chris Watson < Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: You can try just re-running "trac-prep -prior" and "trac-paths" for the L uncinate and no other tracts
On 09/11/2014 02:58 PM, Michele Cavallari wrote: So, I re-ran the case with the set reinit option. It "half"worked!...in the sense that the new results show the left uncinate right, but the right-side one is still a dot (see screenshot of the brain view from the bottom). Any further suggestion? Thanks.
Inline image 2
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Michele Cavallari < cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks! it's running...
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Barbara Kreilkamp < bakk.hbg@googlemail.com> wrote: Hi Michele,
Don't think there is anything wrong with the attacheddmrirc.tutorial file. You definitely need to add the '-c' flag infront of the path to your configuration file. Right now it reads the path to your file as a flag, which is of course not what you want.
Best, Barbara On 11/09/2014 17:49, Michele Cavallari wrote: Hi Anastasia, I am probably doing something wrong with the syntaxof the dmrirc file. I get this error message
trac-all -prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_ tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
ERROR: flag /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_ tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial unrecognized
-prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_ tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
Could you please check the attached file?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Anastasia Yendiki < ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Thanks, Michele. Hard to tell what's causing this, perhaps a bit ofdistortion orbitofrontally. You may be able to fix this type of thing by reinitializing the tract reconstruction: Add "set reinit = 1" to your configuration file, set the pathlist to include only the left and right uncinate, and then rerun the -prior and -path steps of trac-all on this subject.
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: uploaded (and activated).Thanks! On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Michele - The anatomical segmentation does lookgood, but from the screenshot the DWI data seems to be noisy in the orbitofrontal area, which may be affecting the uncinate. It's hard to tell just from one slice.
If you upload all the tracula output directories ofthis subject (dmri, dmri.bedpostX, dlabel, dpath) for me here, I'll take a look: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/
Thanks! a.y On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: Hi Anastasia,I completed the tracula processing. By looking at the tractography results in theviewer I noticed that the uncinate fasciculus is pretty small (see attached screenshot). It actually appears as a small blue dot. And the problem is both on the left and right side. The other tracts look fine. I played with threshold, but the size didn't increase. So, I guess that something wrong happened with the tractography of that particular bundle. I checked the aparc+aseg output (attached): it seems right to me, but could you please double-check? Let me also know if you have any suggestions, and if you need more information or output files. Best, Michele
Inline image 1 On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Ludy - If your gradient table isformatted in 3 rows you need to either:
1. Convert it to 3 columns so you can useit with the 5.3 version of tracula, which requires the gradient table to be formatted in columns
OR 2. Download the tracula update that can usegradient tables formatted in rows
Hope this helps, a.y On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, lshih@bidmc.harvard.eduwrote:
> Hi, > > I was having similar errors as MicheleCavallari regarding "error reading /path/to/subject/dmri/dwi_frame," but I'm not sure it's related to my bvecs file. I did try reconfiguring my bvecs file into columns instead of row just in case, but that didn't solve the problem. It really just looks like it can't find the dwi_frame file after the mri_concat command. > > I am attaching my trac-all.log and config file. > > Running Freesurfer 5.3 on Macbook OS 10.7.5. The bvecs files were generated after I converted my dicoms to nifti using dcm2niigui (GE scanner). > > Can anyone tell me how dwi_frame is generated? > > > Ludy > > This message is intended for the use of the person(s) to whom it may be addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, copying, or use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please permanently delete it and immediately notify the sender. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended onlyfor the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for theperson to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Michele - If there are large parts of the brain mask missing that overlap with one of the tracts, the reconstruction of that tract will keep failing. You should investigate why the aseg failed in that part of the brain. It's hard to guess without seeing the images. If there's a large artifact in the structural scan in that area then it may be irrecoverable, but if not it's worth fixing it.
a.y
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote:
Hi Anastasia, thanks for your feedback. I checked both te aparc+aseg and the diffusion images. There is some underestimation of left insula and left temporal pole in the mask, corresponding to quite large missing (0 value) areas in the FA maps. I tried to re-run the -prep step using the "-prior" option and with no success: still getting a 'segmentation fault' error message (log and error files attached).
Is there anything else I can try to analyze this case without having to re-run the segmentation/parcellation? And are there ways to improve the parcellation in those regions?
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Michele - It seems like it's failing in the right uncinate again. From the error, I would guess that part of that tract is getting left out of the brain mask or something of that sort. Can you please check how that area looks in the aparc+aseg and in the diffusion data? a.y On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: Hi, I am having problems with tracula pre-processing for a case of a series I am analyzing. The processing worked without errors for two out of three cases I was running at the same time. I received a 'segmentation fault' error. I checked the FreeSurfer recon-all output, and it was completed without errors. I tried to re-process the case alone: got the very same outcome. I am enclosing the log file of the tracula processing of the case that's giving me an error. Let me know if you need more information/files. Thanks, -Michele On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Chris Watson <Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: I don't think that would change the results (significantly), so you would just be wasting processing time. It depends on the quality of your data. In this thread, as Anastasia said earlier, there is distortion around the L orbitofrontal cortex, which may have caused the problem Michele was having (reconstructing the L uncinate). But if you're *only* interested in a subset of the available tracts, you should probably comment out the others, if you want to save time. On 09/16/2014 07:18 AM, Barbara Kreilkamp wrote: Dear all, What does this mean? That tracula is more robust when running it seperately for the tracts I am interested in? Thanks, Barbara On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Michele Cavallari <cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote: errata corrige: it did work! I had to re-run the whole thing including only that specific tract...and eventually it worked. On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michele Cavallari <cavallari.michele@gmail.com> wrote: Tried...unfortunately it didn't improve On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Chris Watson <Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: You can try just re-running "trac-prep -prior" and "trac-paths" for the L uncinate and no other tracts On 09/11/2014 02:58 PM, Michele Cavallari wrote: So, I re-ran the case with the set reinit option. It "half" worked!...in the sense that the new results show the left uncinate right, but the right-side one is still a dot (see screenshot of the brain view from the bottom). Any further suggestion? Thanks.Inline image 2
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Michele Cavallari cavallari.michele@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! it's running...
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Barbara Kreilkamp bakk.hbg@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Michele,
Don't think there is anything wrong with the attached dmrirc.tutorial file. You definitely need to add the '-c' flag infront of the path to your configuration file. Right now it reads the path to your file as a flag, which is of course not what you want.
Best, Barbara
On 11/09/2014 17:49, Michele Cavallari wrote: Hi Anastasia, I am probably doing something wrong with the syntax of the dmrirc file. I get this error message
trac-all -prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
ERROR: flag /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial unrecognized
-prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
Could you please check the attached file?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Thanks, Michele. Hard to tell what's causing this, perhaps a bit of distortion orbitofrontally. You may be able to fix this type of thing by reinitializing the tract reconstruction: Add "set reinit = 1" to your configuration file, set the pathlist to include only the left and right uncinate, and then rerun the -prior and -path steps of trac-all on this subject.
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote:
uploaded (and activated).Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Michele - The anatomical segmentation does look good, but from the screenshot the DWI data seems to be noisy in the orbitofrontal area, which may be affecting the uncinate. It's hard to tell just from one slice.
If you upload all the tracula output directories of this subject (dmri, dmri.bedpostX, dlabel, dpath) for me here, I'll take a look: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/
Thanks! a.y
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote:
Hi Anastasia,I completed the tracula processing. By looking at the tractography results in the viewer I noticed that the uncinate fasciculus is pretty small (see attached screenshot). It actually appears as a small blue dot. And the problem is both on the left and right side. The other tracts look fine. I played with threshold, but the size didn't increase. So, I guess that something wrong happened with the tractography of that particular bundle. I checked the aparc+aseg output (attached): it seems right to me, but could you please double-check? Let me also know if you have any suggestions, and if you need more information or output files. Best, Michele
Inline image 1
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Ludy - If your gradient table is formatted in 3 rows you need to either:
1. Convert it to 3 columns so you can use it with the 5.3 version of tracula, which requires the gradient table to be formatted in columns
OR
2. Download the tracula update that can use gradient tables formatted in rows
Hope this helps, a.y
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, lshih@bidmc.harvard.edu wrote:
> Hi, > > I was having similar errors as Michele Cavallari regarding "error reading /path/to/subject/dmri/dwi_frame," but I'm not sure it's related to my bvecs file. I did try reconfiguring my bvecs file into columns instead of row just in case, but that didn't solve the problem. It really just looks like it can't find the dwi_frame file after the mri_concat command. > > I am attaching my trac-all.log and config file. > > Running Freesurfer 5.3 on Macbook OS 10.7.5. The bvecs files were generated after I converted my dicoms to nifti using dcm2niigui (GE scanner). > > Can anyone tell me how dwi_frame is generated? > > > Ludy > > This message is intended for the use of the person(s) to whom it may be addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, copying, or use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please permanently delete it and immediately notify the sender. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Barbara - It means that, depending on the peculiarities of a specific data set, one tract may be trickier than others and the algorithm may need to retry multiple initializations to get it right. It would be nice if it figured that out by itself and reinitialized without you having to do it manually - maybe one of these days I'll get around to implementing that, it's on my to-do list!
a.y
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Barbara Kreilkamp wrote:
Dear all,
What does this mean? That tracula is more robust when running it seperately for the tracts I am interested in? Thanks, Barbara
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Michele Cavallari cavallari.michele@gmail.com wrote: errata corrige: it did work! I had to re-run the whole thing including only that specific tract...and eventually it worked.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michele Cavallari cavallari.michele@gmail.com wrote: Tried...unfortunately it didn't improve
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Chris Watson Christopher.Watson@childrens.harvard.edu wrote: You can try just re-running "trac-prep -prior" and "trac-paths" for the L uncinate and no other tracts
On 09/11/2014 02:58 PM, Michele Cavallari wrote: So, I re-ran the case with the set reinit option. It "half" worked!...in the sense that the new results show the left uncinate right, but the right-side one is still a dot (see screenshot of the brain view from the bottom). Any further suggestion?Thanks.
Inline image 2
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Michele Cavallari cavallari.michele@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! it's running...
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Barbara Kreilkamp bakk.hbg@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Michele,
Don't think there is anything wrong with the attached dmrirc.tutorial file. You definitely need to add the '-c' flag infront of the path to your configuration file. Right now it reads the path to your file as a flag, which is of course not what you want. Best, Barbara On 11/09/2014 17:49, Michele Cavallari wrote: Hi Anastasia, I am probably doing something wrong with the syntax of the dmrirc file.I get this error message
trac-all -prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
ERROR: flag /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial unrecognized
-prior /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/sages_uncinate_dmrirc.tutorial
Could you please check the attached file?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Thanks, Michele. Hard to tell what's causing this, perhaps a bit of distortion orbitofrontally. You may be able to fix this type of thing by reinitializing the tract reconstruction: Add "set reinit = 1" to your configuration file, set the pathlist to include only the left and right uncinate, and then rerun the -prior and -path steps of trac-all on this subject. On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: uploaded (and activated).Thanks! On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Michele - The anatomical segmentation does look good, but from the screenshot the DWI data seems to be noisy in the orbitofrontal area, which may be affecting the uncinate. It's hard to tell just from one slice. If you upload all the tracula output directories of this subject (dmri, dmri.bedpostX, dlabel, dpath) for me here, I'll take a look: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/ Thanks! a.y On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote: Hi Anastasia,I completed the tracula processing. By looking at the tractography results in the viewer I noticed that the uncinate fasciculus is pretty small (see attached screenshot). It actually appears as a small blue dot. And the problem is both on the left and right side. The other tracts look fine. I played with threshold, but the size didn't increase. So, I guess that something wrong happened with the tractography of that particular bundle. I checked the aparc+aseg output (attached): it seems right to me, but could you please double-check? Let me also know if you have any suggestions, and if you need more information or output files. Best, Michele Inline image 1 On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Ludy - If your gradient table is formatted in 3 rows you need to either: 1. Convert it to 3 columns so you can use it with the 5.3 version of tracula, which requires the gradient table to be formatted in columns OR 2. Download the tracula update that can use gradient tables formatted in rows Hope this helps, a.y On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, lshih@bidmc.harvard.edu wrote: > Hi, > > I was having similar errors as Michele Cavallari regarding "error reading /path/to/subject/dmri/dwi_frame," but I'm not sure it's related to my bvecs file. I did try reconfiguring my bvecs file into columns instead of row just in case, but that didn't solve the problem. It really just looks like it can't find the dwi_frame file after the mri_concat command. > > I am attaching my trac-all.log and config file. > > Running Freesurfer 5.3 on Macbook OS 10.7.5. The bvecs files were generated after I converted my dicoms to nifti using dcm2niigui (GE scanner). > > Can anyone tell me how dwi_frame is generated? > > > Ludy > > This message is intended for the use of the person(s) to whom it may be addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, copying, or use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please permanently delete it and immediately notify the sender. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu