Hi Doug,
Thanks for the quickly reply. The new version of mri_segstats works fine. I noticed after running it though that all the volumes are slightly different than those reported by previous version. I think it might have something to do with the partial volume correction, as the results are the same when I do not use the --pv flag. Is this expected behavior? And if so, is the new version more accurate?
Thanks again,
-Tyler
________________________________
The material in this message is private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information (PHI). If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
yes, this is a fix that will be in the next release. The new results are more accurate. doug
On 08/22/2012 11:54 AM, Blazey, Tyler wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thanks for the quickly reply. The new version of mri_segstats works fine. I noticed after running it though that all the volumes are slightly different than those reported by previous version. I think it might have something to do with the partial volume correction, as the results are the same when I do not use the --pv flag. Is this expected behavior? And if so, is the new version more accurate?
Thanks again,
-Tyler
The material in this message is private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information (PHI). If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi, Doug and all, I wonder if the new version of mri_segstats on the ftp site will change both the ICV and the SupraTentorial volume? Nick seems to mention ICV will be different, the ReleaseNotes says the SupraTentorial Volume will be changed to smaller. Can you explain more on the difference of the new version with the original version in FS.5.1.0? Is everything on the morphometry stats website still the same? http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/MorphometryStats. I'm interested in several measurements, including the ICV, and the SupraTentorial Volume and all the structures volume, just wondering if the new version will change all the measurements.
Thanks. -Natalie
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Douglas N Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
yes, this is a fix that will be in the next release. The new results are more accurate. doug
On 08/22/2012 11:54 AM, Blazey, Tyler wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thanks for the quickly reply. The new version of mri_segstats works fine. I noticed after running it though that all the volumes are slightly different than those reported by previous version. I think it might have something to do with the partial volume correction, as the results are the same when I do not use the --pv flag. Is this expected behavior? And if so, is the new version more accurate?
Thanks again,
-Tyler
The material in this message is private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information (PHI). If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
The ICV will not change because that depends on the talairach transform. mri_segstats just reads in the transform that is there and computes the ICV (note that this is an *estimated* ICV, it is not derived by counting voxels). There have been several bugs with mri_segstats that are difficult to explain. Most of them have to do with making small adjustments to the various brain volume measurements (not ICV), and there was a fix to the partial volume correction too. The new version will change all of the measurements (except ICV).
doug
On 08/23/2012 08:31 PM, Natalie Han wrote:
Hi, Doug and all, I wonder if the new version of mri_segstats on the ftp site will change both the ICV and the SupraTentorial volume? Nick seems to mention ICV will be different, the ReleaseNotes says the SupraTentorial Volume will be changed to smaller. Can you explain more on the difference of the new version with the original version in FS.5.1.0? Is everything on the morphometry stats website still the same? http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/MorphometryStats. I'm interested in several measurements, including the ICV, and the SupraTentorial Volume and all the structures volume, just wondering if the new version will change all the measurements.
Thanks. -Natalie
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Douglas N Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
yes, this is a fix that will be in the next release. The new results are more accurate. doug
On 08/22/2012 11:54 AM, Blazey, Tyler wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thanks for the quickly reply. The new version of mri_segstats works fine. I noticed after running it though that all the volumes are slightly different than those reported by previous version. I think it might have something to do with the partial volume correction, as the results are the same when I do not use the --pv flag. Is this expected behavior? And if so, is the new version more accurate?
Thanks again,
-Tyler
The material in this message is private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information (PHI). If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu