Yep. That would explain it. Thanks!

--------- Jim Porter Graduate Student Clinical Science & Psychopathology Research University of Minnesota

Doug Greve wrote:

The values in the mgh file should be -log10(abs(CWP)). Would that explain the discrepancy?

James N Porter wrote:

...

Hello-

When I look at the CWP results of mri_surfcluster in the sig.cluster.sum versus the resultant sig.cluster.mgh, the results are different. Specifically, all clusters negatively correlated with my independent variable display a value in tksurfer of -1+CWP, and clusters that are positively correlated display a value of 1-CWP.

Which values should I believe as my actual p-values, the .sum's CWP or the .mgh's added/subtracted values?

Thanks for your help,

---

Jim Porter Graduate Student Clinical Science & Psychopathology Research University of Minnesota

---

Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer