Hello!
I was running the full Monte Carlo simulation on the 40 subjects tutorial data (following the Group Analysis tutorial, with mri_glmfit from command line) and I see the simulation is still running after 10 days...
I was wondering if this was normal or something is wrong. (using a single 2GHz dual-core Intel Xeon processor on an 8GB Mac workstation). What would be an expected time for that simulation, with exactly the same options/parameters as given in the tutorial command (shown below)? mri_glmfit --y lh.gender_age.thickness.10.mgh \ --glmdir lh.gender_age.glmdir \ --fsgd gender_age.txt doss \ --surf fsaverage lh \ --fwhm 14.517 --C age.mat \ --sim mc-full 10000 2 lh.gender_age.glmdir/csd1Thank you very much, Silviu Podariu U.Nebr.Med.Cent. Omaha, NE
Silviu,
MC-full is really slow. you can get almost same results using mc-z that is quicker.
thanks pratap
Hello!
I was running the full Monte Carlo simulation on the 40 subjects tutorial data (following the Group Analysis tutorial, with mri_glmfit from command line) and I see the simulation is still running after 10 days...
I was wondering if this was normal or something is wrong. (using a single 2GHz dual-core Intel Xeon processor on an 8GB Mac workstation). What would be an expected time for that simulation, with exactly the same options/parameters as given in the tutorial command (shown below)? mri_glmfit --y lh.gender_age.thickness.10.mgh \ --glmdir lh.gender_age.glmdir \ --fsgd gender_age.txt doss \ --surf fsaverage lh \ --fwhm 14.517 --C age.mat \ --sim mc-full 10000 2 lh.gender_age.glmdir/csd1Thank you very much, Silviu Podariu U.Nebr.Med.Cent. Omaha, NE
_______________________________________________Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Pratap Kunwar -
Silviu Podariu