Hi, I was wondering if it were possible/advisable to use data processed and cached using earlier versions of FreeSurfe with the new 5.0 QDEC, since it has enhanced capabilities.
Sincerely, Mira
Mira Michelle Raman Scientific Programmer Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research Stanford University
Dear Mira,
I posted a similar question some days ago. It seems to be possible to use the new qdec version for the group analysis for data that has been processed and cached with version 4.x (at least 4.05 and newer).
Check this posting in the mailing archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg15166.html
Best wishes, Christian
--- Christian Scheel University of Cologne Department of Psychiatry
Am 30.09.2010 20:45, schrieb Mira Michelle Raman:
Hi, I was wondering if it were possible/advisable to use data processed and cached using earlier versions of FreeSurfe with the new 5.0 QDEC, since it has enhanced capabilities.
Sincerely, Mira
Mira Michelle Raman Scientific Programmer Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research Stanford University _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
yes, you may use v5 qdec with prior processed data.
n.
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 21:04 +0200, Christian Scheel wrote:
Dear Mira,
I posted a similar question some days ago. It seems to be possible to use the new qdec version for the group analysis for data that has been processed and cached with version 4.x (at least 4.05 and newer).
Check this posting in the mailing archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg15166.html
Best wishes, Christian
Christian Scheel University of Cologne Department of Psychiatry
Am 30.09.2010 20:45, schrieb Mira Michelle Raman:
Hi, I was wondering if it were possible/advisable to use data processed and cached using earlier versions of FreeSurfe with the new 5.0 QDEC, since it has enhanced capabilities.
Sincerely, Mira
Mira Michelle Raman Scientific Programmer Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research Stanford University _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi,
I'm interested in this issue. If I use a former FreeSurfer version (ver. 4.x) for all the preprocessing of each data and apply the new QDEC in FreeSurfer ver. 5.0.0 JUST to make analyses easier (say, use of mri_glmfit-sim), do I have to specify both FreeSurfer ver. 4.x and FreeSurfer 5.0.0 (or QDEC ver 1.4) in the methodological section of research manuscripts? Or is it enough to mention FreeSurfer ver. 4.x (and mri_glmfit-sim) for the analyses?
Best regards,
Manabu
Graduate school of medicine, Kyoto University
2010/10/1 Nick Schmansky nicks@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
yes, you may use v5 qdec with prior processed data.
n.
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 21:04 +0200, Christian Scheel wrote:
Dear Mira,
I posted a similar question some days ago. It seems to be possible to use the new qdec version for the group analysis for data that has been processed and cached with version 4.x (at least 4.05 and newer).
Check this posting in the mailing archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg15166.html
Best wishes, Christian
Christian Scheel University of Cologne Department of Psychiatry
Am 30.09.2010 20:45, schrieb Mira Michelle Raman:
Hi, I was wondering if it were possible/advisable to use data processed and cached using earlier versions of FreeSurfe with the new 5.0 QDEC, since it has enhanced capabilities.
Sincerely, Mira
Mira Michelle Raman Scientific Programmer Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research Stanford University _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
You can say 4.x. The statistical part did not change that much in version 5.
doug
Manabu Kubota wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in this issue. If I use a former FreeSurfer version (ver. 4.x) for all the preprocessing of each data and apply the new QDEC in FreeSurfer ver. 5.0.0 JUST to make analyses easier (say, use of mri_glmfit-sim), do I have to specify both FreeSurfer ver. 4.x and FreeSurfer 5.0.0 (or QDEC ver 1.4) in the methodological section of research manuscripts? Or is it enough to mention FreeSurfer ver. 4.x (and mri_glmfit-sim) for the analyses?
Best regards,
Manabu
Graduate school of medicine, Kyoto University
2010/10/1 Nick Schmansky nicks@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
yes, you may use v5 qdec with prior processed data.
n.
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 21:04 +0200, Christian Scheel wrote:
Dear Mira,
I posted a similar question some days ago. It seems to be possible to use the new qdec version for the group analysis for data that has been processed and cached with version 4.x (at least 4.05 and newer).
Check this posting in the mailing archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg15166.html
Best wishes, Christian
Christian Scheel University of Cologne Department of Psychiatry
Am 30.09.2010 20:45, schrieb Mira Michelle Raman:
Hi, I was wondering if it were possible/advisable to use data processed and cached using earlier versions of FreeSurfe with the new 5.0 QDEC, since it has enhanced capabilities.
Sincerely, Mira
Mira Michelle Raman Scientific Programmer Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research Stanford University _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Christian Scheel -
Douglas N Greve -
Manabu Kubota -
Mira Michelle Raman -
Nick Schmansky