External Email - Use Caution
Dear experts,
I am using the mri_surfcluster function to cluster the surface results:
mri_surfcluster --subject fbb_average --mask mask.mgh --hemi lh --olab label --in sig_results_tvalues.mgh --thmin 0.000000000000001
When I count vertices different than 0 in the results file that I give as input (which contains only the significant vertex t values) I get a value (for example, total= 6237 vertices). The problem is that when I add the vertices of the output labels, the total number of vertices is less (for example: total=6152 vertices).
Why does the number of total vertices not match? Is the function I use correct?
Thank you very much in advance. Marina
Maybe those 88 vertices have a value lower than the thresh or are not in the mask.
On 6/17/2020 6:42 AM, Marina Fernández wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear experts,
I am using the mri_surfcluster function to cluster the surface results:
mri_surfcluster --subject fbb_average --mask mask.mgh --hemi lh --olab label --in sig_results_tvalues.mgh --thmin 0.000000000000001
When I count vertices different than 0 in the results file that I give as input (which contains only the significant vertex t values) I get a value (for example, total= 6237 vertices). The problem is that when I add the vertices of the output labels, the total number of vertices is less (for example: total=6152 vertices).
Why does the number of total vertices not match? Is the function I use correct?
Thank you very much in advance. Marina
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Douglas N. Greve -
Marina Fernández