Dear FS experts,
I downloaded the FS 6.0 dev version for Linux on 11.08.2016 and now I see that there is a new version since the 14th of August.
I ran about 20 recon-alls with the 11.08 version and now I am wondering if there were any major changes between that and the new one, and if so, whether I should rerun anything.
I am assuming that having the newest version is always better, but I would rather check if it is necessary before downloading the new one and rerunning all the recon-alls.
Thanks!
Renata
Ps.: I am using the hippocampal subfields flag and checking the volumes of the subregions of the hippocampus.
PLEASE DO NOT USE ANYTHING LABELLED AS "6.0" FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN TESTING. WHEN WE RELEASE 6.0 WE WILL MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT.
Thanks
The FreeSurfer Team
Hi, Doug. Is it possible to run FreeSurfer 6 Hippocampal-subfields on FreeSurfer 5.3 recons, or this also should not be done? Best, Pedro Rosa.
On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:58, Douglas Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT USE ANYTHING LABELLED AS "6.0" FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN TESTING. WHEN WE RELEASE 6.0 WE WILL MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT.
Thanks
The FreeSurfer Team
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
I don't know. This is a question for Eugenio
On 8/24/16 11:53 AM, pedrogomesrosa@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Doug. Is it possible to run FreeSurfer 6 Hippocampal-subfields on FreeSurfer 5.3 recons, or this also should not be done? Best, Pedro Rosa.
On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:58, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT USE ANYTHING LABELLED AS "6.0" FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN TESTING. WHEN WE RELEASE 6.0 WE WILL MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT.
Thanks
The FreeSurfer Team
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
You can! It just makes your results harder to reproduce (running recon-all with one version, and the subfields with the other).
Juan Eugenio Iglesias Translational Imaging Group University College London http://www.jeiglesias.com http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
On 24 Aug 2016, at 17:01, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
I don't know. This is a question for Eugenio
On 8/24/16 11:53 AM, pedrogomesrosa@gmail.commailto:pedrogomesrosa@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Doug. Is it possible to run FreeSurfer 6 Hippocampal-subfields on FreeSurfer 5.3 recons, or this also should not be done? Best, Pedro Rosa.
On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:58, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT USE ANYTHING LABELLED AS "6.0" FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN TESTING. WHEN WE RELEASE 6.0 WE WILL MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT.
Thanks
The FreeSurfer Team
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Many thanks!
Pedro Rosa.
On Aug 24, 2016, at 13:48, Iglesias, Eugenio e.iglesias@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
You can! It just makes your results harder to reproduce (running recon-all with one version, and the subfields with the other).
Juan Eugenio Iglesias Translational Imaging Group University College London http://www.jeiglesias.com http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
On 24 Aug 2016, at 17:01, Douglas Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
I don't know. This is a question for Eugenio
On 8/24/16 11:53 AM, pedrogomesrosa@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Doug. Is it possible to run FreeSurfer 6 Hippocampal-subfields on FreeSurfer 5.3 recons, or this also should not be done? Best, Pedro Rosa.
On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:58, Douglas Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT USE ANYTHING LABELLED AS "6.0" FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN TESTING. WHEN WE RELEASE 6.0 WE WILL MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT.
Thanks
The FreeSurfer Team
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Renata, version 6 is not ready and should not be used. As far as we know, there is not a link to 6.0 anywhere on our web pages. Where did you find it?
doug
On 8/24/16 5:48 AM, Vaz pandolfo, Renata wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I downloaded the FS 6.0 dev version for Linux on 11.08.2016 and now I see that there is a new version since the 14th of August.
I ran about 20 recon-alls with the 11.08 version and now I am wondering if there were any major changes between that and the new one, and if so, whether I should rerun anything.
I am assuming that having the newest version is always better, but I would rather check if it is necessary before downloading the new one and rerunning all the recon-alls.
Thanks!
Renata
Ps.: I am using the hippocampal subfields flag and checking the volumes of the subregions of the hippocampus.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi Douglas,
Thank you for the quick response. Maybe I didn't explain it well enough, I am downloading it from here: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/dev/
I know it is the developmental version, but we are looking at the subregions and that's the only way we can.
My question was about the change between the different developmental versions 11.08.16 and 14.08.16, I was wondering if whatever had been changed between them would affect the Hippocampus Subfields.
Thanks!
Renata
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Douglas Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Renata, version 6 is not ready and should not be used. As far as we know, there is not a link to 6.0 anywhere on our web pages. Where did you find it?
doug
On 8/24/16 5:48 AM, Vaz pandolfo, Renata wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I downloaded the FS 6.0 dev version for Linux on 11.08.2016 and now I see that there is a new version since the 14th of August.
I ran about 20 recon-alls with the 11.08 version and now I am wondering if there were any major changes between that and the new one, and if so, whether I should rerun anything.
I am assuming that having the newest version is always better, but I would rather check if it is necessary before downloading the new one and rerunning all the recon-alls.
Thanks!
Renata
Ps.: I am using the hippocampal subfields flag and checking the volumes of the subregions of the hippocampus.
Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hello Renata,
As far as I know, the only change between those two versions was a bug fix that related to the number of arguments based to the longitudinal component of the HippoSF code. If you didnt encounter this error before than I dont think anything would change for you.
HOWEVER, I must reiterate that you are using developmental code and that this code is possibly updated at any time. We do not advertise it as stable or version6. On the same token, I have discussed this issue with Eugenio Iglesias (primary developer of Hippocampus Subfields code) and he indicates that their is *likely* to be very little if any difference between the current dev version and the version in the upcoming v6 release.
Hope this helps.
-Zeke
On 08/24/2016 11:42 AM, Vaz pandolfo, Renata wrote:
Hi Douglas,
Thank you for the quick response. Maybe I didn't explain it well enough, I am downloading it from here: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/dev/
I know it is the developmental version, but we are looking at the subregions and that's the only way we can.
My question was about the change between the different developmental versions 11.08.16 and 14.08.16, I was wondering if whatever had been changed between them would affect the Hippocampus Subfields.
Thanks!
Renata
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Renata, version 6 is not ready and should not be used. As far as we know, there is not a link to 6.0 anywhere on our web pages. Where did you find it? doug On 8/24/16 5:48 AM, Vaz pandolfo, Renata wrote:Dear FS experts, I downloaded the FS 6.0 dev version for Linux on 11.08.2016 and now I see that there is a new version since the 14th of August. I ran about 20 recon-alls with the 11.08 version and now I am wondering if there were any major changes between that and the new one, and if so, whether I should rerun anything. I am assuming that having the newest version is always better, but I would rather check if it is necessary before downloading the new one and rerunning all the recon-alls. Thanks! Renata Ps.: I am using the hippocampal subfields flag and checking the volumes of the subregions of the hippocampus. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline <http://www.partners.org/complianceline> . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Douglas Greve -
Iglesias, Eugenio -
pedrogomesrosa＠gmail.com -
Vaz pandolfo, Renata -
Z K