Hi all,
I'm noticing that when pulling up a brainmask volume with surfs and aseg on, the pial and white surfaces are (thankfully) very often correct, but the aseg in cortex is a bit off - often including parts of the skull/dura as gray matter - even though the pial surface does follow this boundary correctly. As long as the surfaces are correct, and my primary interest will be cortical thickness, do I need to worry about these inaccuracies in the aseg? Is checking the aseg primarily done for ensuring accuracy in subcortical structures rather than in cortex?
thanks, Nicole
Hi Nicole
no, you don't need to worry about them. That's one of the reasons we use the surfaces for cortical morphometry instead of the voxel-based measures.
cheers Bruce On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Nicole Senecal wrote:
Hi all, I'm noticing that when pulling up a brainmask volume with surfs and aseg on, the pial and white surfaces are (thankfully) very often correct, but the aseg in cortex is a bit off - often including parts of the skull/dura as gray matter - even though the pial surface does follow this boundary correctly. As long as the surfaces are correct, and my primary interest will be cortical thickness, do I need to worry about these inaccuracies in the aseg? Is checking the aseg primarily done for ensuring accuracy in subcortical structures rather than in cortex?
thanks, Nicole
-- Nicole Senecal Neuroscience Graduate Group Kable Lab 3720 Walnut St., Room C37 Philadelphia, PA 19104 Lab phone: 215-746-4371
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu