Dear Antonin,

Thanks for the advices.

Best, Matthieu

Le 30 janv. 2017 à 17:45, Antonin Skoch ansk@ikem.cz a écrit :

Dear Matthieu,

your issue is discussed here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg51092.html

and indirectly also here: http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg51111.html

I think that with V6.0 you maybe could get slightly better results (some bugs have been fixed and some tools improved), but definitelly it would require to re-inspect your data after reprocessing.

Antonin Skoch

Dear experts,

Does anybody could answer my last request ? Best, Matthieu

2017-01-26 9:58 GMT+01:00 Matthieu Vanhoutte matthieuvanhou...@gmail.com:

...

Dear FS's experts,

I have run all my cross with v5.3 and hesitate to run all longitudinal process with v6. Does that make sense and will improve the process or would it be risky to do this ?

Many thanks for your lights !

Best regards, Matthieu

---

Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.