Some weeks ago,I have posted here a compilation of the main papers that describe FreeSurfer implementation. I was wondering if someone has researched in comparison between FreeSurfer methodology and other ones. (For instance: doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.056)
Best Regards
PPJ
Hi Pedro, Attached are 4 papers that I'm aware of that explicitly compare aspects of FS to other approaches (Lee 2006; Tae 2008; Pengas 2008; Ju 2005)
Those particularly interested in TICV should take a look at the Pengas paper (which is timely, given the recent discussion on the list regarding the reliability of the "eTIV" measure).
cheers, Mike H.
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 13:50 -0200, Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior wrote:
Some weeks ago,I have posted here a compilation of the main papers that describe FreeSurfer implementation.
I was wondering if someone has researched in comparison between FreeSurfer methodology and other ones. (For instance: doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.056)
Best Regards
PPJ
--
Pedro Paulo de M. Oliveira Junior Diretor de Operações Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu