Hello all,
I have noticed a discrepancy in the volumes generated by aparcstats2table and mri_segstats using aparc+aseg. Which is correct?
I am using version 5.3.
Thanks,
Corinna
The numbers generated by aparcstats2table are the right ones since it uses surface-based subvoxel computations. The aparc+aseg is mostly for visualization or doing ROI analysis for fmri/pet/dti
doug
On 03/25/2014 11:58 AM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
Hello all,
I have noticed a discrepancy in the volumes generated by aparcstats2table and mri_segstats using aparc+aseg. Which is correct?
I am using version 5.3.
Thanks,
Corinna
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu