Greetings Freesurfer Community,
I am running a longitudinal study using Freesurfer v.5.3 to compare rate of cortical thinning between 2 groups of subjects. I hope I can seek some expert advice on the following situation:
All data (both the baseline and follow-up) has been processed independently using recon-all. This has been done on Freesurfer 5.0.
Since then, I have upgraded to Freesurfer v5.3 to utilize the linear mixed effect capability.
For the construction of base and longs, I understand that it is important to add -clean flag to my recon-all strings to overwrite brainmask.mgz etc. When must this be done?
I am still new to Freesurer, and I'd greatly appreciate any advice regarding workflow.
Many Thanks,
Elijah
Hi Elijah,
if you have minimal edits, I'd recommend to reprocess the data from scratch with 5.3 (that is supposed to be the same as using the -clean flag when rerunning 5.3 on top of the old 5.0 data). But I'd recommend to create a new subjectsdir, copy over the subjedid/mri/orig dirs for each subject and rerun from scratch with 5.3 the independent, base and long runs.
Best, Martin
On 01/13/2014 06:18 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
Greetings Freesurfer Community,
I am running a longitudinal study using Freesurfer v.5.3 to compare rate of cortical thinning between 2 groups of subjects. I hope I can seek some expert advice on the following situation:
All data (both the baseline and follow-up) has been processed independently using recon-all. This has been done on Freesurfer 5.0.
Since then, I have upgraded to Freesurfer v5.3 to utilize the linear mixed effect capability.
For the construction of base and longs, I understand that it is important to add -clean flag to my recon-all strings to overwrite brainmask.mgz etc. When must this be done?
I am still new to Freesurer, and I'd greatly appreciate any advice regarding workflow.
Many Thanks,
Elijah
--
Elijah Mak, B.A.
Doctoral Candidate *|* Psychiatry
University of Cambridge *| *Department of Psychiatry
Trinity College, Cambridge, CB2 1TQ
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your help.
By re-processing, do you mean running recon-alls all over again?
Could you elaborate on the advantage of creating a new subjectsdir and copying over the orig dirs for each subject?
On a related note, would it be better to run the full recon-all pipeline for each subject? I have been running batches of subjects at each stage (i.e. autorecon1, autorecon2, and finally autorecon3).
Thank you again.
Best Wishes, Elijah
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Martin Reuter mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
Hi Elijah,
if you have minimal edits, I'd recommend to reprocess the data from scratch with 5.3 (that is supposed to be the same as using the -clean flag when rerunning 5.3 on top of the old 5.0 data). But I'd recommend to create a new subjectsdir, copy over the subjedid/mri/orig dirs for each subject and rerun from scratch with 5.3 the independent, base and long runs.
Best, Martin
On 01/13/2014 06:18 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
Greetings Freesurfer Community,
I am running a longitudinal study using Freesurfer v.5.3 to compare rate of cortical thinning between 2 groups of subjects. I hope I can seek some expert advice on the following situation:
All data (both the baseline and follow-up) has been processed independently using recon-all. This has been done on Freesurfer 5.0.
Since then, I have upgraded to Freesurfer v5.3 to utilize the linear mixed effect capability.
For the construction of base and longs, I understand that it is important to add -clean flag to my recon-all strings to overwrite brainmask.mgz etc. When must this be done?
I am still new to Freesurer, and I'd greatly appreciate any advice regarding workflow.
Many Thanks,
Elijah
--
Elijah Mak, B.A.
Doctoral Candidate *|* Psychiatry
University of Cambridge *| *Department of Psychiatry
Trinity College, Cambridge, CB2 1TQ
Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Martin Reuter, Ph.D. Assistant in Neuroscience - Massachusetts General Hospital Instructor in Neurology - Harvard Medical School MGH / HMS / MIT
A.A.Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging 149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301 Charlestown, MA 02129
Phone: +1-617-724-5652 Email: mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu reuter@mit.edu Web : http://reuter.mit.edu
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Elijah,
On 01/15/2014 04:10 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your help.
By re-processing, do you mean running recon-alls all over again?
Yes. 5.0 is old and it is better to run everything with 5.3 from beginning to end. If you have a lot of data or a lot of edits, you can try running -base and -long in 5.3 and keep the independent (cross sectional) stuff in 5.0, but I don't recommend mixing versions.
Could you elaborate on the advantage of creating a new subjectsdir and copying over the orig dirs for each subject?
This way you keep a backup copy of your old 5.0 processed data (to lookup edits etc). If you have a script that calls recon-all with the -i flag for inputs, you don't need to copy the mri/orig dirs (it will grab the data from the dicoms again). Copying the orig dirs and dropping -i will skip that step.
On a related note, would it be better to run the full recon-all pipeline for each subject? I have been running batches of subjects at each stage (i.e. autorecon1, autorecon2, and finally autorecon3).
Yes, full pipeline (-all) on all subjects is what I usually do. You can run individual steps and check intermediate results if you like, but I usually run everything and check everything at the end.
Best, Martin
Thank you again.
Best Wishes, Elijah
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Martin Reuter <mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Elijah, if you have minimal edits, I'd recommend to reprocess the data from scratch with 5.3 (that is supposed to be the same as using the -clean flag when rerunning 5.3 on top of the old 5.0 data). But I'd recommend to create a new subjectsdir, copy over the subjedid/mri/orig dirs for each subject and rerun from scratch with 5.3 the independent, base and long runs. Best, Martin On 01/13/2014 06:18 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:Greetings Freesurfer Community, I am running a longitudinal study using Freesurfer v.5.3 to compare rate of cortical thinning between 2 groups of subjects. I hope I can seek some expert advice on the following situation: All data (both the baseline and follow-up) has been processed independently using recon-all. This has been done on Freesurfer 5.0. Since then, I have upgraded to Freesurfer v5.3 to utilize the linear mixed effect capability. For the construction of base and longs, I understand that it is important to add -clean flag to my recon-all strings to overwrite brainmask.mgz etc. When must this be done? I am still new to Freesurer, and I'd greatly appreciate any advice regarding workflow. Many Thanks, Elijah -- Elijah Mak, B.A. Doctoral Candidate *|* Psychiatry University of Cambridge *| *Department of Psychiatry Trinity College, Cambridge, CB2 1TQ _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer-- Martin Reuter, Ph.D. Assistant in Neuroscience - Massachusetts General Hospital Instructor in Neurology - Harvard Medical School MGH / HMS / MIT A.A.Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging 149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301 Charlestown, MA 02129 Phone:+1-617-724-5652 <tel:%2B1-617-724-5652> Email: mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> reuter@mit.edu <mailto:reuter@mit.edu> Web :http://reuter.mit.edu The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.--
Elijah Mak, B.A.
Doctoral Candidate *|* Psychiatry
University of Cambridge *| *Department of Psychiatry
Trinity College, Cambridge, CB2 1TQ
Hi Martin,
We corresponded about the longitudinal pipeline earlier. Your help has been much appreciated. I am now at the stage where I am ready to perform QDEC analyses using the 2-stage method.
In my Subject DIR, I have all the longs (Tp1 and 2) and their corresponding bases. However, when i run the following command
long_mris_slopes --qdec ./qdec/long.qdec.table.dat --meas thickness --hemi lh --do-avg --do-rate --do-pc1 --do-spc --do-stack --do-label --time years --qcache fsaverage --sd $SUBJECTS_DIR
It says that fsaverage is missing.
Can I simply copy the fsverage folder from the default Freesurfer "subjects" folder?
Many thanks! Best Regards, Elijah
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Martin Reuter mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Elijah,
On 01/15/2014 04:10 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your help.
By re-processing, do you mean running recon-alls all over again?
Yes. 5.0 is old and it is better to run everything with 5.3 from beginning to end. If you have a lot of data or a lot of edits, you can try running -base and -long in 5.3 and keep the independent (cross sectional) stuff in 5.0, but I don't recommend mixing versions.
Could you elaborate on the advantage of creating a new subjectsdir and copying over the orig dirs for each subject?
This way you keep a backup copy of your old 5.0 processed data (to lookup edits etc). If you have a script that calls recon-all with the -i flag for inputs, you don't need to copy the mri/orig dirs (it will grab the data from the dicoms again). Copying the orig dirs and dropping -i will skip that step.
On a related note, would it be better to run the full recon-all pipeline for each subject? I have been running batches of subjects at each stage (i.e. autorecon1, autorecon2, and finally autorecon3).
Yes, full pipeline (-all) on all subjects is what I usually do. You can run individual steps and check intermediate results if you like, but I usually run everything and check everything at the end.
Best, Martin
Thank you again.
Best Wishes, Elijah
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Martin Reuter mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Elijah,
if you have minimal edits, I'd recommend to reprocess the data from scratch with 5.3 (that is supposed to be the same as using the -clean flag when rerunning 5.3 on top of the old 5.0 data). But I'd recommend to create a new subjectsdir, copy over the subjedid/mri/orig dirs for each subject and rerun from scratch with 5.3 the independent, base and long runs.
Best, Martin
On 01/13/2014 06:18 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
Greetings Freesurfer Community,
I am running a longitudinal study using Freesurfer v.5.3 to compare rate of cortical thinning between 2 groups of subjects. I hope I can seek some expert advice on the following situation:
All data (both the baseline and follow-up) has been processed independently using recon-all. This has been done on Freesurfer 5.0.
Since then, I have upgraded to Freesurfer v5.3 to utilize the linear mixed effect capability.
For the construction of base and longs, I understand that it is important to add -clean flag to my recon-all strings to overwrite brainmask.mgz etc. When must this be done?
I am still new to Freesurer, and I'd greatly appreciate any advice regarding workflow.
Many Thanks,
Elijah
--
Elijah Mak, B.A.
Doctoral Candidate | Psychiatry
University of Cambridge | Department of Psychiatry
Trinity College, Cambridge, CB2 1TQ
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Martin Reuter, Ph.D. Assistant in Neuroscience - Massachusetts General Hospital Instructor in Neurology - Harvard Medical School MGH / HMS / MIT
A.A.Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging 149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301 Charlestown, MA 02129
Phone: +1-617-724-5652 Email: mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu reuter@mit.edu Web : http://reuter.mit.edu
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
--
Elijah Mak, B.A.
Doctoral Candidate | Psychiatry
University of Cambridge | Department of Psychiatry
Trinity College, Cambridge, CB2 1TQ
-- Martin Reuter, Ph.D. Assistant in Neuroscience - Massachusetts General Hospital Instructor in Neurology - Harvard Medical School MGH / HMS / MIT
A.A.Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging 149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301 Charlestown, MA 02129
Phone: +1-617-724-5652 Email: mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu reuter@mit.edu Web : http://reuter.mit.edu
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu