Hi,
Running mri_glmfit ( v5.0.0, Mac OSX10.6) I got he following error message:
ERROR: matrix is ill-conditioned or badly scaled, condno = 1e+08 Possible problem with experimental design: Check for duplicate entries and/or lack of range of continuous variables within a class. If you seek help with this problem, make sure to send: 1. Your command line: mri_glmfit --y lh.sib_con_cann_aangepast3.thickness.sm0.mgh -- fsgd ../../STATS/FSGD/age_gender_scan_educ_hand_cannabis/ fsgd_sib_con_cann_aangepast3.fsgd dods --glmdir lh.sib_con_cann_aangepast3.dods.sm0.glmdir --surf fsaverage lh -- C ../../STATS/FSGD/age_gender_scan_educ_hand_cannabis/ group_thickness_gender_scan_age_educ_hand_cann.mtx 2. The FSGD file (if using one) 3. And the design matrix above
Please find attached the requested files.
I noticed that rows 68 and 147 of the matrix Xg.dat are identical, and most probably caused the error. In the fsgd file I see that the correspondig cases indeed have identical values, although they are referring to different data. How to proceed?
Cheers, Ed

Hi Ed, the problem is that your covariates are highly correlated. Eg, column 1 is nearly identical to column 17. doug
On 01/24/2013 06:36 AM, Ed Gronenschild wrote:
Hi,
Running mri_glmfit ( v5.0.0, Mac OSX10.6) I got he following error message:
ERROR: matrix is ill-conditioned or badly scaled, condno = 1e+08 Possible problem with experimental design: Check for duplicate entries and/or lack of range of continuous variables within a class. If you seek help with this problem, make sure to send:
- Your command line:
mri_glmfit --y lh.sib_con_cann_aangepast3.thickness.sm0.mgh --fsgd../../STATS/FSGD/age_gender_scan_educ_hand_cannabis/fsgd_sib_con_cann_aangepast3.fsgd dods --glmdir lh.sib_con_cann_aangepast3.dods.sm0.glmdir --surf fsaverage lh --C ../../STATS/FSGD/age_gender_scan_educ_hand_cannabis/group_thickness_gender_scan_age_educ_hand_cann.mtx
- The FSGD file (if using one)
- And the design matrix above
Please find attached the requested files.
I noticed that rows 68 and 147 of the matrix Xg.dat are identical, and most probably caused the error. In the fsgd file I see that the correspondig cases indeed have identical values, although they are referring to different data. How to proceed?
Cheers, Ed
=
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu