Hi Jaiashre,

generally we advise against mixing version. It may work, but it may also fail. We do not test these combinations. I know for example that people did run 5.3 base and long on top of 5.1 cross successfully (at least they claim). I don’t know how mixing with 6.0 behaves.

I am wondering where the problem comes from as it should not be caused by the longitudinal stream, maybe by some changes in the regular stream between 5.3 and 6.0 or maybe due to your special way of running things.

Please just re-run this one subject completely from scratch through the full 6.0 pipeline (cross, base and long) and see if it remains.

Best, Martin

On 13 Mar 2017, at 15:48, Jaiashre Sridhar jaiashre.sridhar@northwestern.edu wrote:

Bruce,

We had previously addressed an issue with creating the bases from 5 timepoints in v5.1 where mri_robust_register failed. We were advised by Dr. Martin Reuter to either replace mri_robust_register & mri_robust_template binary with the ones from v5.3 or to run all the bases and longs in v5.3. We chose to run the longitudinal stream in v6.0 as it was released by then. If it is not safe to mix versions (cross in v5.1; base-long in v6.0), could you clarify if it is alright to just use the binaries from v5.3/v6.0?

Thank you very much, Jaiashre. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer