Does cluster cover the exact same region in the group map as in the individual? Even if you choose the same nominal region (eg, posterior cingulate) you will not get the same exact number when you do it in fsaverage space as when it is done in the native space. doug

Antonella Kis wrote:

Dear Doug,

I just checked my results for the average thickness from each subject generated in the csdbase.y.ocn.dat file in different clusters (e.g. I have 5 clusters for p<0.05). For cluster #1 - posteriorcingulate, the average thickness for subject 1 is different from the average thickness value in the same region-posteriorcingulate, in the lh.aparc.stats for the same subject. I thought it should be the same. Why they are different? Is this right?

MANY THANKS! Antonella