I was checking the values at both aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz and aparc+aseg.mgz and comparing it with the labels in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt
I have noticed some problems: 1) There are values out of the range specified in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt (in bert dataset there are 353528 voxels with values above 14999) 2) There are many areas in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt that don't appear neither in aparc+aseg nor in aparc.a2009s+aseg
My main concern is with the out of range values, which structure they map to?
thanks --------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior Diretor de Operações Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom -- www.netfilter.com.br -- For mobile: http://www.netfilter.com.br/mobile
Hi,
1) what means are you using to find the values? when i use:
mri_binarize --i aparc+aseg.mgz --min 14176 --o aparc+aseg+14176.mgz
it doesnt find any voxels above 14176 in either file.
2) the FreeSurferColorLUT.txt contains labels for many different labeling projects done at the center, so only a subset of these make it into the default vols created by recon-all.
n.
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 17:53 -0300, Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior wrote:
I was checking the values at both aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz and aparc +aseg.mgz and comparing it with the labels in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt
I have noticed some problems:
- There are values out of the range specified
in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt (in bert dataset there are 353528 voxels with values above 14999) 2) There are many areas in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt that don't appear neither in aparc+aseg nor in aparc.a2009s+aseg
My main concern is with the out of range values, which structure they map to?
thanks
Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior Diretor de Operações Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom -- www.netfilter.com.br -- For mobile: http://www.netfilter.com.br/mobile
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu