Dear FS experts, I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz". Which one of the following commands is more accurate?
1. mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2. mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best, Mohamad
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thank you very much Doug for your answer. Kindly I have one more question: Although the registration between my functional data and "wmparc.mgz" is perfect. When I run the first command bellow, I get zeros ( in the report wmparc.stats) only for the cerebellum parcellates, and this was prominent in many of my subjects. Is this issue related to a missing flags in my "mri_segstats" command line?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:17 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
What do you mean you got 0s only for the cblum segs? Did all other segs have non-zeros, but clbum have 0s? And did you get non-0s in the 2nd commandline?
On 07/07/2016 05:16 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you very much Doug for your answer. Kindly I have one more question: Although the registration between my functional data and "wmparc.mgz" is perfect. When I run the first command bellow, I get zeros ( in the report wmparc.stats) only for the cerebellum parcellates, and this was prominent in many of my subjects. Is this issue related to a missing flags in my "mri_segstats" command line?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:17 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thank you Doug!
Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum structures have zeros for the mean, SD , ...etc ( red circles) Also if we scroll down ( not included), all the cerebellum parcellates ( white and cortex) are zeros. I have this issue with 70 % of the subjects. I applied the first command on all the subjects. I never tried the second command, but I was inquiring because I thought that maybe the first command is missing some flags so "mri-segstats" is unable to read the cerebellum parcellates
For the subjects who have zeros for the cerebellum parcellates. I checked the functional images one by one ( the registration is perfect) and the images are fine.
I can't explain why this is happening so thank you for any suggestion.
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 5:45 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
What do you mean you got 0s only for the cblum segs? Did all other segs have non-zeros, but clbum have 0s? And did you get non-0s in the 2nd commandline?
On 07/07/2016 05:16 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you very much Doug for your answer. Kindly I have one more question: Although the registration between my functional data and "wmparc.mgz" is perfect. When I run the first command bellow, I get zeros ( in the report wmparc.stats) only for the cerebellum parcellates, and this was prominent in many of my subjects. Is this issue related to a missing flags in my "mri_segstats" command line?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:17 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thank you Doug!
Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum structures have zeros for the mean, SD , ...etc ( red circles) Also if we scroll down ( not included), all the cerebellum parcellates ( white and cortex) are zeros. I have this issue with 70 % of the subjects. I applied the first command on all the subjects. I never tried the second command, but I was inquiring because I thought that maybe the first command is missing some flags so "mri-segstats" is unable to read the cerebellum parcellates
For the subjects who have zeros for the cerebellum parcellates. I checked the functional images one by one ( the registration is perfect) and the images are fine.
I can't explain why this is happening so thank you for any suggestion.
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 5:45 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
What do you mean you got 0s only for the cblum segs? Did all other segs have non-zeros, but clbum have 0s? And did you get non-0s in the 2nd commandline?
On 07/07/2016 05:16 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you very much Doug for your answer. Kindly I have one more question: Although the registration between my functional data and "wmparc.mgz" is perfect. When I run the first command bellow, I get zeros ( in the report wmparc.stats) only for the cerebellum parcellates, and this was prominent in many of my subjects. Is this issue related to a missing flags in my "mri_segstats" command line?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:17 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Your suvr is axially sliced whereas the anatomical is corronally sliced. They must be in exact pixel-for-pixel alignment for mri_segstats to work.
On 07/18/2016 06:27 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you Doug!
Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum structures have zeros for the mean, SD , ...etc ( red circles) Also if we scroll down ( not included), all the cerebellum parcellates ( white and cortex) are zeros. I have this issue with 70 % of the subjects. I applied the first command on all the subjects. I never tried the second command, but I was inquiring because I thought that maybe the first command is missing some flags so "mri-segstats" is unable to read the cerebellum parcellates
For the subjects who have zeros for the cerebellum parcellates. I checked the functional images one by one ( the registration is perfect) and the images are fine.
I can't explain why this is happening so thank you for any suggestion.
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 5:45 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
What do you mean you got 0s only for the cblum segs? Did all other segs have non-zeros, but clbum have 0s? And did you get non-0s in the 2nd commandline?
On 07/07/2016 05:16 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you very much Doug for your answer. Kindly I have one more question: Although the registration between my functional data and "wmparc.mgz" is perfect. When I run the first command bellow, I get zeros ( in the report wmparc.stats) only for the cerebellum parcellates, and this was prominent in many of my subjects. Is this issue related to a missing flags in my "mri_segstats" command line?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:17 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thank you Doug, Kindly how can I make the suvr and the anatomical images in the same slice?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:56 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
Your suvr is axially sliced whereas the anatomical is corronally sliced. They must be in exact pixel-for-pixel alignment for mri_segstats to work.
On 07/18/2016 06:27 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you Doug!
Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum structures have zeros for the mean, SD , ...etc ( red circles) Also if we scroll down ( not included), all the cerebellum parcellates ( white and cortex) are zeros. I have this issue with 70 % of the subjects. I applied the first command on all the subjects. I never tried the second command, but I was inquiring because I thought that maybe the first command is missing some flags so "mri-segstats" is unable to read the cerebellum parcellates
For the subjects who have zeros for the cerebellum parcellates. I checked the functional images one by one ( the registration is perfect) and the images are fine.
I can't explain why this is happening so thank you for any suggestion.
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 5:45 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
What do you mean you got 0s only for the cblum segs? Did all other segs have non-zeros, but clbum have 0s? And did you get non-0s in the 2nd commandline?
On 07/07/2016 05:16 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you very much Doug for your answer. Kindly I have one more question: Although the registration between my functional data and "wmparc.mgz" is perfect. When I run the first command bellow, I get zeros ( in the report wmparc.stats) only for the cerebellum parcellates, and this was prominent in many of my subjects. Is this issue related to a missing flags in my "mri_segstats" command line?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:17 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thank you Doug, I used the command fslswapdim
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Alshikho, Mohamad J. Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:59 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
Thank you Doug, Kindly how can I make the suvr and the anatomical images in the same slice?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:56 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
Your suvr is axially sliced whereas the anatomical is corronally sliced. They must be in exact pixel-for-pixel alignment for mri_segstats to work.
On 07/18/2016 06:27 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you Doug!
Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum structures have zeros for the mean, SD , ...etc ( red circles) Also if we scroll down ( not included), all the cerebellum parcellates ( white and cortex) are zeros. I have this issue with 70 % of the subjects. I applied the first command on all the subjects. I never tried the second command, but I was inquiring because I thought that maybe the first command is missing some flags so "mri-segstats" is unable to read the cerebellum parcellates
For the subjects who have zeros for the cerebellum parcellates. I checked the functional images one by one ( the registration is perfect) and the images are fine.
I can't explain why this is happening so thank you for any suggestion.
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 5:45 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
What do you mean you got 0s only for the cblum segs? Did all other segs have non-zeros, but clbum have 0s? And did you get non-0s in the 2nd commandline?
On 07/07/2016 05:16 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you very much Doug for your answer. Kindly I have one more question: Although the registration between my functional data and "wmparc.mgz" is perfect. When I run the first command bellow, I get zeros ( in the report wmparc.stats) only for the cerebellum parcellates, and this was prominent in many of my subjects. Is this issue related to a missing flags in my "mri_segstats" command line?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:17 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Register the suvr to the anatomical (mri_coreg) then use mri_vol2vol
On 7/18/16 6:58 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you Doug, Kindly how can I make the suvr and the anatomical images in the same slice?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:56 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
Your suvr is axially sliced whereas the anatomical is corronally sliced. They must be in exact pixel-for-pixel alignment for mri_segstats to work.
On 07/18/2016 06:27 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you Doug!
Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum structures have zeros for the mean, SD , ...etc ( red circles) Also if we scroll down ( not included), all the cerebellum parcellates ( white and cortex) are zeros. I have this issue with 70 % of the subjects. I applied the first command on all the subjects. I never tried the second command, but I was inquiring because I thought that maybe the first command is missing some flags so "mri-segstats" is unable to read the cerebellum parcellates
For the subjects who have zeros for the cerebellum parcellates. I checked the functional images one by one ( the registration is perfect) and the images are fine.
I can't explain why this is happening so thank you for any suggestion.
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 5:45 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
What do you mean you got 0s only for the cblum segs? Did all other segs have non-zeros, but clbum have 0s? And did you get non-0s in the 2nd commandline?
On 07/07/2016 05:16 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you very much Doug for your answer. Kindly I have one more question: Although the registration between my functional data and "wmparc.mgz" is perfect. When I run the first command bellow, I get zeros ( in the report wmparc.stats) only for the cerebellum parcellates, and this was prominent in many of my subjects. Is this issue related to a missing flags in my "mri_segstats" command line?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:17 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
I'm at a loss as to why that is the case. Can you send the PET.anat.mgz and wmparc.mgz to our filedrop?
On 07/18/2016 06:14 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you Doug!
Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum structures have zeros for the mean, SD , ...etc ( red circles) Also if we scroll down ( not included), all the cerebellum parcellates ( white and cortex) are zeros. I have this issue with 70 % of the subjects. I applied the first command on all the subjects. I never tried the second command, but I was inquiring because I thought that maybe the first command is missing some flags so "mri-segstats" is unable to read the cerebellum parcellates
For the subjects who have zeros for the cerebellum parcellates. I checked the functional images one by one ( the registration is perfect) and the images are fine.
I can't explain why this is happening so thank you for any suggestion.
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 5:45 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
What do you mean you got 0s only for the cblum segs? Did all other segs have non-zeros, but clbum have 0s? And did you get non-0s in the 2nd commandline?
On 07/07/2016 05:16 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you very much Doug for your answer. Kindly I have one more question: Although the registration between my functional data and "wmparc.mgz" is perfect. When I run the first command bellow, I get zeros ( in the report wmparc.stats) only for the cerebellum parcellates, and this was prominent in many of my subjects. Is this issue related to a missing flags in my "mri_segstats" command line?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:17 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
I sent the files (wmparc.mgz and the functional image)
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:29 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
I'm at a loss as to why that is the case. Can you send the PET.anat.mgz and wmparc.mgz to our filedrop?
On 07/18/2016 06:14 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you Doug!
Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum structures have zeros for the mean, SD , ...etc ( red circles) Also if we scroll down ( not included), all the cerebellum parcellates ( white and cortex) are zeros. I have this issue with 70 % of the subjects. I applied the first command on all the subjects. I never tried the second command, but I was inquiring because I thought that maybe the first command is missing some flags so "mri-segstats" is unable to read the cerebellum parcellates
For the subjects who have zeros for the cerebellum parcellates. I checked the functional images one by one ( the registration is perfect) and the images are fine.
I can't explain why this is happening so thank you for any suggestion.
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 5:45 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
What do you mean you got 0s only for the cblum segs? Did all other segs have non-zeros, but clbum have 0s? And did you get non-0s in the 2nd commandline?
On 07/07/2016 05:16 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Thank you very much Doug for your answer. Kindly I have one more question: Although the registration between my functional data and "wmparc.mgz" is perfect. When I run the first command bellow, I get zeros ( in the report wmparc.stats) only for the cerebellum parcellates, and this was prominent in many of my subjects. Is this issue related to a missing flags in my "mri_segstats" command line?
-----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:17 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_segstats
The first one
On 07/06/2016 08:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
Dear FS experts,
I have PET image "pet.anat.mgz" in subject space. I want to calculate the mean PET signal for every parcellate and segment in the atlas "wmparc.mgz".
_Which one of the following commands is more accurate? _
__
1.mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/${subj}/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab $FREESURFER_HOME/FREESURFERColorLUT.txt --i PET.anat.mgz --sum PET.wmparc.stats
2.mri_segstats --seg mri/wmparc.mgz --sum stats/wmparc.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --excludeid 0 --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --in mri/ PET.anat.mgz--in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --subject ${subj} --surf-wm-vol --ctab /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/WMParcStatsLUT.txt --etiv
Best,
Mohamad
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Alshikho, Mohamad J. -
Douglas Greve -
Douglas N Greve