Hi all
I used Optseq to optimize rapid event designs with multiple conditions . I have a theortical question : how it is possible to distingwoh the close by trials ? Is it by de convoution ? How is it possible to deal with overallped trials ?
Is it because the conditions are random so that when averaging them the distingwoh is possible?
Many thanks
Aser
It is because the random jitter creates differential amounts of overlap. Imagine if you have A=C+D and B=C-D. You know A and B, but you want C and D. You have two equations and two unknowns, so you can solve for C and D from A and B eventhough C and D "overlap" in A and B and you never see C or D by themselves. This is a type of deconvolution
On 11/10/17 11:38 AM, Aser A wrote:
Hi all
I used Optseq to optimize rapid event designs with multiple conditions . I have a theortical question : how it is possible to distingwoh the close by trials ? Is it by de convoution ? How is it possible to deal with overallped trials ?
Is it because the conditions are random so that when averaging them the distingwoh is possible?
Many thanks
Aser
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu