Hi Chacko,

Can you upload one subject to our filedrop so that I can have a look. https://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html

Thanks, Jenni

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Chacko Cherian wrote:

Thanks Bruce. I Am using version 3.0.3,..wat can i do to to get better pial surface images? IS it something to do with the skull stripping stage or is it the motion artifacts which cause a reduction in the overall resoution of the image?

Chacko.

----- Original Message ---- From: Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu To: Chacko Cherian chacko_cherian@yahoo.com Cc: Freesurfer freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Sent: Monday, November 6, 2006 4:25:05 PM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] is this ok?

Hi Chako,

I wouldn't worry too much about the inflated - it looks okay. Probably a result of the large motion artifact in your data. The pial surface is more worrisome - what version are you running? They are usually *much* better than this.

Bruce On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Chacko Cherian wrote:

...

Hello freesurer users,

Is it ok to have such edges on the inflated surface?Is there something I can do to rectify this? THe second image is the brainmask and wm volume as seen using tkmedit.

(tkmedit subj1 brainmask.mgz lh.white -aux wm.mgz -aux-surface rh.white)

THanks in advance

Best,

Chacko Cherian

---

Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer