Dear all,
I found that mri_label2label generates different results, depending on whether the software’s platform is MacOS Lion or CentOS 6.
Is this possible?
Thanks! Daniel
what version are you using? I think this is a bug we fixed a few months ago. Or another one....
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Dear all,
I found that mri_label2label generates different results, depending on whether the software’s platform is MacOS Lion or CentOS 6.
Is this possible?
Thanks! Daniel
Ah, it¹s FreeSurfer 5.3 ‹ Release Date 15 May 2013.
Do you mean that the FreeSurfer 5.3 was updated after 05/15/2013?
Thanks, Daniel
On 6/19/14, 7:55 PM, "Bruce Fischl" fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
what version are you using? I think this is a bug we fixed a few months ago. Or another one....
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Dear all,
I found that mri_label2label generates different results, depending on whether the software¹s platform is MacOS Lion or CentOS 6.
Is this possible?
Thanks! Daniel
I just tried a few different versions of FreeSurfer. Here are the results:
1. FreeSurfer-5.3 (Linux, CentOS 6, Release: 05/15/2013) 2. FreeSurfer-5.3 (Darwin, Lion, Release: 05/15/2013) 3. FreeSurfer-dev (Linux, CentOS 6, 06/19/2014) 4. FreeSurfer-dev (Darwin, Lion, 06/19/2014)
I am comparing the results of mri_label2label and then mris_anatomical_stats here.
The results of 3 and 4 are the same The results of 1 and 2 are different The results of 1 and 3 are different The results or 2 and 4 are different
In my testing, I used an arbitrary label file and here is detail information of area, volume, thickness, thicknessstd, meancurv, gauscurv, foldind, and curvind
1: 1261.0,4900.0,2.763,0.818,0.145,0.048,28.0,3.7 2: 1109.0,4343.0,2.761,0.798,0.15,0.046,23.0,2.8 3: 1261.0,4900.0,2.763,0.818,0.132,0.032,22.0,2.3 4: 1261.0,4900.0,2.763,0.818,0.132,0.032,22.0,2.3
What should we do here? Is the difference between 1 and 3 trivial?
Thanks! Daniel
On 6/19/14, 8:13 PM, "Yang, Daniel" <yung-jui.yang@yale.edumailto:yung-jui.yang@yale.edu> wrote:
Ah, it¹s FreeSurfer 5.3 ‹ Release Date 15 May 2013.
Do you mean that the FreeSurfer 5.3 was updated after 05/15/2013?
Thanks, Daniel
On 6/19/14, 7:55 PM, "Bruce Fischl" <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
what version are you using? I think this is a bug we fixed a few months ago. Or another one....
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Dear all, I found that mri_label2label generates different results, depending on whether the software¹s platform is MacOS Lion or CentOS 6. Is this possible? Thanks! Daniel
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
I think it was a bug we fixed after the release. We can send you new versions on those operating systems and you can try them out.
Zeke: can you get Daniel new versions of mri_label2label?
thanks Bruce
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Ah, it¹s FreeSurfer 5.3 ‹ Release Date 15 May 2013.
Do you mean that the FreeSurfer 5.3 was updated after 05/15/2013?
Thanks, Daniel
On 6/19/14, 7:55 PM, "Bruce Fischl" fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
what version are you using? I think this is a bug we fixed a few months ago. Or another one....
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Dear all,
I found that mri_label2label generates different results, depending on whether the software¹s platform is MacOS Lion or CentOS 6.
Is this possible?
Thanks! Daniel
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thanks! Is there a list of bug fixed (after release) somewhere? Should we use the development version instead?
Please tell me that it is only mri_label2label that has a bug …
On 6/19/14, 9:08 PM, "Bruce Fischl" <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
I think it was a bug we fixed after the release. We can send you new versions on those operating systems and you can try them out.
Zeke: can you get Daniel new versions of mri_label2label?
thanks Bruce
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Ah, it¹s FreeSurfer 5.3 ‹ Release Date 15 May 2013.
Do you mean that the FreeSurfer 5.3 was updated after 05/15/2013?
Thanks, Daniel
On 6/19/14, 7:55 PM, "Bruce Fischl" <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
what version are you using? I think this is a bug we fixed a few months ago. Or another one....
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Dear all,
I found that mri_label2label generates different results, depending on whether the software¹s platform is MacOS Lion or CentOS 6.
Is this possible?
Thanks! Daniel
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Yes, it was only mri_label2label has that bug
On Jun 19, 2014, at 10:14 PM, "Yang, Daniel" yung-jui.yang@yale.edu wrote:
Thanks! Is there a list of bug fixed (after release) somewhere? Should we use the development version instead?
Please tell me that it is only mri_label2label that has a bug …
On 6/19/14, 9:08 PM, "Bruce Fischl" fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
I think it was a bug we fixed after the release. We can send you new versions on those operating systems and you can try them out.
Zeke: can you get Daniel new versions of mri_label2label?
thanks Bruce
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Ah, it¹s FreeSurfer 5.3 ‹ Release Date 15 May 2013.
Do you mean that the FreeSurfer 5.3 was updated after 05/15/2013?
Thanks, Daniel
On 6/19/14, 7:55 PM, "Bruce Fischl" fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
what version are you using? I think this is a bug we fixed a few months ago. Or another one....
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Dear all,
I found that mri_label2label generates different results, depending on whether the software¹s platform is MacOS Lion or CentOS 6.
Is this possible?
Thanks! Daniel
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
That is great to know!
I personally feel that there should be some sort of autoupdate function or patch file list in FreeSurfer so that when a bug like this is fixed, FreeSurfer can be updated automatically or we can apply the patch from the website. I think the one currently released should be FreeSurfer 5.3.1, with this bug fixed. This bug could have invalidated the research results to some extent if one is retrieving ROI-based stats manually, I feel. Many major software tend to have bugs after release, like SPSS, so this should be a routine... These are just my two cents.
Daniel
On Jun 19, 2014, at 10:20 PM, "Bruce Fischl" <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Yes, it was only mri_label2label has that bug
On Jun 19, 2014, at 10:14 PM, "Yang, Daniel" <yung-jui.yang@yale.edumailto:yung-jui.yang@yale.edu> wrote:
Thanks! Is there a list of bug fixed (after release) somewhere? Should we use the development version instead?
Please tell me that it is only mri_label2label that has a bug …
On 6/19/14, 9:08 PM, "Bruce Fischl" <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
I think it was a bug we fixed after the release. We can send you new versions on those operating systems and you can try them out.
Zeke: can you get Daniel new versions of mri_label2label?
thanks Bruce
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Ah, it¹s FreeSurfer 5.3 ‹ Release Date 15 May 2013.
Do you mean that the FreeSurfer 5.3 was updated after 05/15/2013?
Thanks, Daniel
On 6/19/14, 7:55 PM, "Bruce Fischl" <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
what version are you using? I think this is a bug we fixed a few months ago. Or another one....
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Dear all,
I found that mri_label2label generates different results, depending on whether the software¹s platform is MacOS Lion or CentOS 6.
Is this possible?
Thanks! Daniel
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
yes, that's a lovely idea, but it is very, very difficult to get NIH funding to support such a thing.
cheers Bruce On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
That is great to know!
I personally feel that there should be some sort of autoupdate function or patch file list in FreeSurfer so that when a bug like this is fixed, FreeSurfer can be updated automatically or we can apply the patch from the website. I think the one currently released should be FreeSurfer 5.3.1, with this bug fixed. This bug could have invalidated the research results to some extent if one is retrieving ROI-based stats manually, I feel. Many major software tend to have bugs after release, like SPSS, so this should be a routine... These are just my two cents.
Daniel
On Jun 19, 2014, at 10:20 PM, "Bruce Fischl" fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Yes, it was only mri_label2label has that bugOn Jun 19, 2014, at 10:14 PM, "Yang, Daniel" yung-jui.yang@yale.edu wrote:
Thanks! Is there a list of bug fixed (after release) somewhere? Should we use the development version instead?Please tell me that it is only mri_label2label that has a bug …
On 6/19/14, 9:08 PM, "Bruce Fischl" fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
I think it was a bug we fixed after the release. We can send you newversions on those operating systems and you can try them out.
Zeke: can you get Daniel new versions of mri_label2label?
thanks Bruce
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Ah, it¹s FreeSurfer 5.3 ‹ Release Date 15 May 2013.Do you mean that the FreeSurfer 5.3 was updated after 05/15/2013?
Thanks, Daniel
On 6/19/14, 7:55 PM, "Bruce Fischl" fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
what version are you using? I think this is a bug we fixed a few monthsago. Or another one....
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Dear all,I found that mri_label2label generates different results, depending on whether the software¹s platform is MacOS Lion or CentOS 6.
Is this possible?
Thanks! Daniel
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu